Amateur boxing article

Post Reply
Hugo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 121
Joined: 27 Apr 2007, 10:29

Amateur boxing article

Post by Hugo »

I found this in a pro site, please take look at it and post your opinion. :box:
WHY DOES AMATEUR BOXING SUCK?

14 January, 2008 by Pedro Fernandez


CURING BOXING ILLS BEGINS IN AMATEURS

San Francisco, CA- Having just watched a press conference involving a woman held hostage for six years in Colombia, now free and reunited with her family, I was thinking how could one top that? The subject is boxing. Once the champion of sports, the “minor league” system is so flawed and corrupt, at least here in the United States, that there is no way that the game of boxing can truly grow.

EMANUEL STEWARD & ALI AAU CHAMPS!

Since 1888, the Amateur Athletic Union (AAU) was the sanctioning body of all amateur sports in this country. (Muhammad Ali 1960, HBO commentator/trainer Emanuel Steward 1964). In 1978, the AAU decided to “give up its jurisdiction with the decline amateurism.” From that point forward, various amateur sports formed sanctioning bodies individually. In 1979, the United States Amateur Boxing Federation (USABF) took over. They soon mandated headgear in Golden Glove fights and the like. At first, this wasn’t such a bad idea. Headgears were designed to prevent cuts and reduce injury. But soon they became “boxing helmets.”

HEADGEARS HIDE MORE THAN ROBBERY MASKS

Big, cumbersome and most importantly ineffective, as it does nobody any good in taking repetitive the headgear has become such a helmet that you can’t figure out who is boxing! In other words, we could introduce Fighter A as Fighter B, and few would know the difference as these headgears are better than the masks employed by some bank robbers.

DECLINE OF AMATEUR GAME HUGE FACTOR

A while back, the incomparable Johnny Bos was talking along these lines. This intrigued me. Having attended some amateur shows since, I studied the crowds and soon realized that nobody outside of the sport itself really likes amateur boxing per se. It is boring, unentertaining, and excites fewer people than ever on a national scale. The style of the sport makes it more like “fencing with gloves” than any an act of aggression between two combatants.

NEW NAME, SAME OLD BORING GAME!

Having had scandals that reached the upper core of the folks running the USABF, this involving millions of dollars missing and unaccounted for, the organization tried to ditch its tarnished reputation with a new name. They now call themselves USA Boxing.

MAKING GAME EXCITING & ACCEPTABLE

It is too late for the 2008 Olympic Games to eliminate headgear. My prescription to cure amateur boxing would also be to change boxing from the summer to the winter games. There are just too many sports that draw better than boxing in the summer competition. Back to the headgear, the masking of the fighter’s facial features makes amateur boxing a thoroughly impersonal experience. We need to go back to amateur boxing circa 1968 (George Foreman at the Olympics) when clean punching and bloody noses ruled!
JMac
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2307
Joined: 06 Sep 2007, 14:41

Post by JMac »

As with any article, some things right and some wrong but I have thought that boxing could move to the winter Olympics as well since the summer is so big and the winter is so boring, it could help boxing...maybe.
boxmel
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3589
Joined: 04 Oct 2003, 22:45

Post by boxmel »

Surprisingly, Fernandez wasn't as nasty as usual. I never read his stuff - and I do think getting rid of headgear isn't the way to go. Never thought about having boxing in the winter - it's not a winter sport - hmmmm. Seems out of place to me. 8)
squarering
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 362
Joined: 21 May 2007, 00:41

Post by squarering »

He is not saying anything new he is just saying it to a larger forum. Removing the headgear probably would help. People like to connect with a face and see emotions and personalities, ect. On the other end of the spectrum are the parents of the kids and the general public that supports the programs. I can't tell you how many times I am asked if these kids wear headgear. If I said no, I would loose a large portion of my sponsorship.There has to be a compromise. I have said before that I think getting rid of the boxers jersey could help a little, and I am not completely against removing the head gear at the Championship level. You could test it at the semi or finals, since that is usually the only time there is a chance of being televised. Comparing it to fencing is close when you think about it . You can see extreme talent and still loose interest if you don't know the boxer personally, it is just an athletic figure. Even in football you have a whole game to get to know a player and he is removing his helmet every time a camera is within 50 yards. Yet I still believe in safety first. The sport can be dangerous enough as it is. As far as the part about the money that is unaccounted for from back in the day, It wasn't just the loss of the funds, it was more about that kind of people that would either be a part of it, or not be on top of it, that were running the show that was part of the initial downfall, poor leadership. I wish I could blast this guy and put him in his place, but I don't feel I have much of a leg to stand on. I hate being on the fence about some of these things it creates a real sore spot, if you know what I mean.
Dennis
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4373
Joined: 19 Nov 2006, 14:54

Post by Dennis »

I never thought about moving boxing to the Winter Olympics. We all know that boxing is a year round sport and is usually conducted indoors so that isn't a problem. If it would help to get more exposure for boxing, I would be all for it. I'm still not convinced that the headgear is the cause of the decline in our sport's TV exposure. It probably didn't help but it wasn't the cause. It is not that hard to identify your boxer by his uniform. We could allow the use of ringnames or other identifying marks on the uniforms. I am open to change if it helps our sport.
boxmel
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3589
Joined: 04 Oct 2003, 22:45

Post by boxmel »

If it would help to get more exposure for boxing, I would be all for it
Do you think boxing fans/spectators would go to the Winter Olympics just to see that sport? I wouldn't. But I don't do cold - at all (and don't whine about the weather in GR, either, Dennis).
We could allow the use of ringnames or other identifying marks on the uniforms.
Heh - half the kids have that already - just not on team uniforms. I don't think having nicknames on uniforms would do much. Let's leave that one to the pros, please. :o
therealPunchDrunk
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 132
Joined: 02 Dec 2007, 23:36

Post by therealPunchDrunk »

Aah, the helmet argument again... The only problem I have with that is that it simply doesn't make sense. Taken at face value, it seems reasonable that people would be able to relate more, if boxers' faces were uncovered. If you think about it for 10 seconds however, you'll see that it's speculation, nothing more. Is football suffering from a spectator crisis? Ice hockey? As far as I know, these are prime time TV sports, and they wear helmets! In fact their helmets cover a larger portion of the face than boxing helmets do. If they can get away with wearing helmets, then it must be something else about amateur boxing that has driven the public interest away.
Post Reply