Edde Futch biography

dempseyfire
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5534
Joined: 29 Oct 2003, 22:56

Post by dempseyfire »

ebeneezer wrote:If the fight was a fix then why would Young stand and allow get his face torn up and risk losing his eye?

Please answer oh all knowing dingleberry.
Quite a fix, letting one's eye get ripped out. Jimmy looked like a Mike Myer's victim . . .he could've easily gone down from a left by Cooney and called it a night. But alas, the truth does seem to get in the way of crankberry's storytelling.

I always have an open mind, but gran proved his BS many times over when some of the many ridiculous assertions he's spouted on here (like when he sweared that Holmes was given many seconds to recover after the Snipes KD due to 'shady dealings' by the referee, only to have been proven otherwise by film posted here and other people who saw the fight live).

I have no problem with someone expressing differing viewpoints but the attitude and BS he spits out at fighters he personally doesn't like is just plain absurd.
BoxBuzz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 29847
Joined: 07 Jun 2005, 16:37

Post by BoxBuzz »

granberry wrote:Dave,

Clowns like buzz and irene are equal to

idiots who can't identify the numbers 0 to 9,

but who pretend to discuss 'mathematics.'

Leave them to their charade.

Sir...I am no clown....I am a "Proffesional Rodeo Entertainer".
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

Goodnight, Irene wrote:
DaveV17 wrote:Two different perspectives.

Granberry is a boxing insider, the type one meets in boxing gyms at small club shows, and at big fights. He is not the type who gets interviewed by HBO, but he knows boxing and he knows the stories and rumors behind most fights that are not written about in boxing magazines or books.

Most message board posters are knowledgeable of boxing history and they read about boxing but most never talk to anyone on the inside. Reading the boxing mags and books is good too, but no substitute for talking to the guys like Granberry. Take advantage of his knowledge. This board is fortunate to have him, he is a great boxing resource.
Where is the evidence of this? & if this is so, what does it amount to when such a person is willing to give themselves over to the folly of bias so utterly, as is our Gran? As for, "knowing the stories & rumours" that amounts to very little, if it is even true.

Personally, I didn't enjoy Gran at first, but I've started to come around. Of course, as he well knows, his takes are hopelessly slanted, & while he's no Michael Matos with his knowledge (Who is?) I like him. I don't think he likes me, however :)
Is no one going to step up to this?
BoxBuzz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 29847
Joined: 07 Jun 2005, 16:37

Post by BoxBuzz »

Well he places himself as the "world's ultimate authority" and as an insider he feels his knowledge trumps anyone elses. What's the point of a dialouge? It's all monolouge. Apparently he has no appreciation for objectivity....only subjectivity.

If he was open to any sort of movement in his thinking it could get interesting but he already knows 100% of what's what. About all you can do with granberry is listen and learn.

The granberry manifesto seems to be static and complete and he is willing to share. So one simply needs to read his contributions to further one's education.
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

Yes, it's complete, in much the same manner as physics was declared complete at the close of the nineteenth century.

Honestly, to the members here who are suckered into Gran's, "insider knowledge & untold wealth of historical understanding" get a clue. Here's a man who, driven by the extremities of hatred & bias, submits viewpoints so skewered by a dearth of objectivity they lose all credibility.

The same member who clings to Ali fights that occurred infinitely past his prime, or a close-ish battle early in his career with Doug Jones, as though they meant anything.

The same member who totally bypasses how old & shot Ali was when he faced his personal hero, Young, but then makes excuses with tears running down his eyes that Young, "threw" his fight with Cooney. Gran thinks Cooney was a fraud, & cannot bare to concede Young lost.

Go through the posts & check it out for yourself. The trend is only too clear. Duran didn't lose against his much-hated Leonard, he faked it. Young faked it. & Dempsey was down twenty-five times against Flynn.

But, hey, as long as he keeps up his pseudo-exasperated, "Clueless" facade, I guess he will always have a few fooled. To the Gran's of the world, spurning the reality of history & enslaving oneself to bias are small prices to pay for the satisfaction that comes with shooting down those he does not care for. A desperate man with a desperately implausible agenda to push.

Btw Gran, if you quit a thread when you have no response, (as has happened numerous times) that's a TKO, not a DQ loss for you.

He's alright in my book :TU:
Post Reply