Nah, I think that was a good call on the part of the judges. I'm not convinced Tarver really has a "best" - even in his top performances, such as agains RJJ in the first fight, where he WAS jobbed, he worked at best two minutes in three and seemed a little disinclined in the guts department. A la Jeff Lacy, this could well be a case of a very smooth American marketing job on a less than stellar fighter (but, oddly, a very believeable actor)black panther wrote:I'd love for Clinton to beat Tarver but it all really depends on how much Tarver as got left - if Tarver is past it you'd have to favour Clinton but at his best Tarver beats Clinton - I mean look at their respective performances against Johnson - and I had Tarver winning his first fight with Johnson as well.