WBC. Title

DG. · Post by **DG.** » 01 Feb 2008, 16:37

Here we go again!

Hatton bashing!

I rate Witters WBC Title wining effort and defences ABOVE Hattons 727 WBU Titles defences.

What do you think?

Do the History Books even mention the WBU?

Dioufy · Post by **Dioufy** » 01 Feb 2008, 16:48

No, but the history books remember a former WBA welterweight world champion and a former IBF, WBA, IBO light welterweight world champion.

Matt W · Post by **Matt W** » 01 Feb 2008, 16:57

And the point of this thread is......???????

Poncey · Post by **Poncey** » 01 Feb 2008, 17:20

Dioufy wrote:No, but the history books remember a former WBA welterweight world champion and a former IBF, WBA, IBO light welterweight world champion.

2 time IBF baby, 2 time.

DG. · Post by **DG.** » 01 Feb 2008, 17:25

Dioufy wrote:No, but the history books remember a former WBA welterweight world champion and a former IBF, WBA, IBO light welterweight world champion.

The same as your post.

Dioufy · Post by **Dioufy** » 01 Feb 2008, 17:26

Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:
Dioufy wrote:No, but the history books remember a former WBA welterweight world champion and a former IBF, WBA, IBO light welterweight world champion.
2 time IBF baby, 2 time.

Ah, I remember now. I forget he vacated it to face Luis Collazo and then re-won it by beating Juan Urango.

DG. · Post by **DG.** » 01 Feb 2008, 17:27

Matt W wrote:And the point of this thread is......???????

The POINT is,

I think it is better to WIN a legit BELT and hold onto it instead of winning a belt VACATING and then going BACK for the belt to call yourself a time Champ etc etc!

Comprende?

Matt W · Post by **Matt W** » 02 Feb 2008, 12:59

Yes, I understand that, but surely it's about who you beat and not what gaudy belt you have around your waist?

m1kee50 · Post by **m1kee50** » 02 Feb 2008, 13:11

Matt W wrote:Yes, I understand that, but surely it's about who you beat and not what gaudy belt you have around your waist?

The 'Herol Graham' effect if I may

Max Molyneux · Post by **Max Molyneux** » 02 Feb 2008, 13:23

DG. wrote:
Matt W wrote:And the point of this thread is......???????
The POINT is,

I think it is better to WIN a legit BELT and hold onto it instead of winning a belt VACATING and then going BACK for the belt to call yourself a time Champ etc etc!

Comprende?

It Is better Indeed.

I like when a champ becomes champ and cleans out the division too rather than just beating one guy thinking their the best.

DG. · Post by **DG.** » 02 Feb 2008, 17:48

Max Molyneux wrote:
DG. wrote:
Matt W wrote:And the point of this thread is......???????
The POINT is,

I think it is better to WIN a legit BELT and hold onto it instead of winning a belt VACATING and then going BACK for the belt to call yourself a time Champ etc etc!

Comprende?

It Is better Indeed.

I like when a champ becomes champ and cleans out the division too rather than just beating one guy thinking their the best.

Exactamundo!