The Woods-Johnson rematch: who wins?
The Woods-Johnson rematch: who wins?
Clinton Woods faces Glencoffe Johnson again for the vacant IBF light-heavyweight title on February 6 in Sheffield. Their last fight ended in a controversial draw in November, with many feeling Johnson was robbed (controversial decisions in boxing, never!). But Johnson turned 35 last month, and the Woods fight was his 50th in a long, hard and illustrious career.
When will that start to show?
Woods claims he hurt his left hand in their first fight, which prevented him fighting full out (we possibly have to take that with a pinch of salt). But he's the younger man at 31, and enjoys hometown advantage again of course.
So who wins?
When will that start to show?
Woods claims he hurt his left hand in their first fight, which prevented him fighting full out (we possibly have to take that with a pinch of salt). But he's the younger man at 31, and enjoys hometown advantage again of course.
So who wins?
For me, there shouldn't be a rematch Glencoffe won quite clearly. I think he's got to be a favourite going in this time. I believe Woods can win this one, but he's got to be aggressive, he's got to be first. I don't think Glencoffe is half the fighter on the back foot, likewise I don't think Woods is a world class back foot fighter.
If its the Clinton with the "never say die" attitude we saw against Ashley, Klemensen and for a few rounds against Woods. Then I think he can win. If Woods thinks he can outbox and outjab Johnson - then this time Glencoffe will get the decision he deserved last time.
So, in essence, for me it's entirely down to Woods. However, I just have the feeling that he believes he can outbox him and will make a costly tactical mistake. Costing him the contest on points.
I don't think a loss to Johnson will be the end of Woods' world title aspirations. I honestly believe that Johnson (when given the proper prep time) would be more than a match for Tarver, so I don't think we should all go "Woods is overated" whatever the outcome of the next fight.
If its the Clinton with the "never say die" attitude we saw against Ashley, Klemensen and for a few rounds against Woods. Then I think he can win. If Woods thinks he can outbox and outjab Johnson - then this time Glencoffe will get the decision he deserved last time.
So, in essence, for me it's entirely down to Woods. However, I just have the feeling that he believes he can outbox him and will make a costly tactical mistake. Costing him the contest on points.
I don't think a loss to Johnson will be the end of Woods' world title aspirations. I honestly believe that Johnson (when given the proper prep time) would be more than a match for Tarver, so I don't think we should all go "Woods is overated" whatever the outcome of the next fight.
-
MightyWarrior
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13262
- Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01
Well Buncey and Woodhall seem to think it'll be totally different next time, not ever so sure why. Woods while tough as nails has never really had a great engine and he was simply out worked last time because of that.
Is our Clint going control Johnson behind the jab this time? I'll believe it when I see it. Good luck to the lad though, it's a nice fight to look forward to.
Is our Clint going control Johnson behind the jab this time? I'll believe it when I see it. Good luck to the lad though, it's a nice fight to look forward to.
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13394
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
-
shakermaker
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 333
- Joined: 09 Dec 2003, 11:21
I'm edging towards Woods and might have a flutter. I can't see Glencoffe coming out with the same ferocity as last time (I had winning by around 3 rounds). Woods needs to grab this chance with both hands because he's lucky he got a second shot at a proper world title after nearing throwing it away last time out.
Why not? That's what Johnson is all about. And it's not like he had to absorb terrible punishment over the 12 rounds against Woods.shakermaker wrote:I can't see Glencoffe coming out with the same ferocity as last time
Expect Johnson to be just as good again, it's about whether Clinton can improve on his performance. Many are confident he will, I'm not so sure he can but I'll be cheering him all the way regardless cause he's such a nice bloke.
-
shakermaker
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 333
- Joined: 09 Dec 2003, 11:21
my earlier point not explained fully/well was that I expect Woods to deal with it (the pressure) better so that Glencoffe isn't as effective plus the first fight wasn't the first time he'd been stiffed recently and once again he has to get his body into the kind of shape that can sustain a frantic pace for 12 rounds knowing full well he might not get the decision again like last time. Will he be as committed and dedicated as he was last time out? I hope he is but it must be hard for a man at his age to come so close and seem always short changed.
Woods has got two options IMO
1) Box and move and use that jab of his to rack up enough points
or
2)meet fire with fire
I think he'll have plans to do 1 but get dragged into how the first fight went and then its in the hands of the judges. If he has such a slow start as he did in the first fight he deserves a good talking to!!!
Woods has got two options IMO
1) Box and move and use that jab of his to rack up enough points
or
2)meet fire with fire
I think he'll have plans to do 1 but get dragged into how the first fight went and then its in the hands of the judges. If he has such a slow start as he did in the first fight he deserves a good talking to!!!
Last edited by shakermaker on 26 Jan 2004, 13:28, edited 1 time in total.
shakermaker wrote:
2)meet fire with fire
The same I'll be stating for the other future geniune world title fight heading to these shoares.
-
shakermaker
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 333
- Joined: 09 Dec 2003, 11:21
-
Hardhitters11
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 942
- Joined: 02 Sep 2003, 13:20