HAVE I MISSED SOMETHING? - HAS HATTON KILLED SOMEONE!!!!??

Chambers2 · Post by **Chambers2** » 15 Feb 2008, 06:04

DG. wrote:
Chambers2 wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote: D.G is right
I've never seen that wrote a forum before
Is that English? - ya ginger!

PS, when you want to get a decent suit, pm me and I will point you to
Savile Row. William - not Ozwald!

Your rapier like wit makes me look stupid again......

....and now for something that DG may understand, fcuk off you inbred nan-shagging filth

DG. · Post by **DG.** » 15 Feb 2008, 06:41

Chambers2 wrote:
DG. wrote:
Chambers2 wrote: I've never seen that wrote a forum before
Is that English? - ya ginger!

PS, when you want to get a decent suit, pm me and I will point you to
Savile Row. William - not Ozwald!

Your rapier like wit makes me look stupid again......

You do it yourself, Ginger, you do it yourself!

Chambers2 · Post by **Chambers2** » 15 Feb 2008, 06:42

DG. wrote:
Chambers2 wrote:
DG. wrote: Is that English? - ya ginger!

PS, when you want to get a decent suit, pm me and I will point you to
Savile Row. William - not Ozwald!

Your rapier like wit makes me look stupid again......
You do it yourself, Ginger, you do it yourself!

You missed the sarcasm then

sharpei_louis · Post by **sharpei_louis** » 15 Feb 2008, 06:46

DG. wrote:
HughJohnson wrote:
DG. wrote:

Dont forget the letter off his mum....

Do enlighten me......Soooo when Junior was getting beaten off a chinny novice who was HAtton fighting.

Junior won!

Check out the bill. Hatton was matched tough.
Nynex Arena, Manchester, Lancashire, United Kingdom
Naseem Hamed W Wilfredo Vazquez TKO 7 12
Carl Thompson W Chris Eubank UD 12 12
Herbie Hide W Damon Reed TKO 1 12
Junior Witter W Jan Piet Bergman PTS 6 6
Anthony Farnell W Harry Butler PTS 6 6
Ricky Hatton W Karl Taylor TKO 1 6
Michael Gomez W Benny Jones PTS 4 4
Peter Buckley L Anthony Mulholland PTS 4 4
Jason Thomas D Hector Orozco PTS 4 4
Graham Townsend L Robin Reid TKO 6 0
Kelly Oliver W Nigel Rafferty TKO 4 0
Jim Rock L Ensley Bingham TKO 7 0

Never mind all this Hatton Witter rubbish now, and why we're again picking the Judah-Witter figth apart is beyond me.

What I want to say is that we rave on about the state of British boxing, but look at this card on here!!!
Haven't had so many decent names together on one bill for years.

Twinkle Toes · Post by **Twinkle Toes** » 15 Feb 2008, 06:49

DG. wrote:
Zab was supposed to be the NEW PERNELL WHITAKER with a punch.

Witter was not perceived as such, PERCEIVED LEVELS.

Even WITTER came out of the fight knowing that he could hang with the best in the World.

THAT FIGHT PROVED IT TO HIM, so why not you?

Wrong again!

Witter had already beaten a fighter well above domestic level in Bergman, so you can't sit there and state that Witter was only domestic class.

Bergman was then beaten 4 fights later by the new 'Pernell Whittaker' (lol at that) - Zab was not perceived to be any higher at all, apart from in the imagination of gangsta wannabees

Tony has made a very good point actually, and no amount of gloss from Witter nut huggers changes the facts :)

Captain Hook · Post by **Captain Hook** » 15 Feb 2008, 07:04

Totally agree, they just bang on about Witter because they hate Ricky Hatton, having no idea of Witter's fornicating career and having never been to watch the boring pudendum.

He won a maximum two rounds against Zab Judah because he was a fanny. He was not a novice. He was into his twenties and given a golden oportunity. He bottled it.

Now he needs the cash because his career has been a non-event and he is calling out one of our best weeks after he has just been knocked out.

Give me a break.

DG. · Post by **DG.** » 15 Feb 2008, 07:05

Chambers2 wrote:
DG. wrote:
Chambers2 wrote: Your rapier like wit makes me look stupid again......
You do it yourself, Ginger, you do it yourself!

You missed the sarcasm then

I think you did!

DG. · Post by **DG.** » 15 Feb 2008, 07:08

Twinkle Toes wrote:
DG. wrote:
Zab was supposed to be the NEW PERNELL WHITAKER with a punch.

Witter was not perceived as such, PERCEIVED LEVELS.

Even WITTER came out of the fight knowing that he could hang with the best in the World.

THAT FIGHT PROVED IT TO HIM, so why not you?

Wrong again!

Witter had already beaten a fighter well above domestic level in Bergman, so you can't sit there and state that Witter was only domestic class.

Bergman was then beaten 4 fights later by the new 'Pernell Whittaker' (lol at that) - Zab was not perceived to be any higher at all, apart from in the imagination of gangsta wannabees

Tony has made a very good point actually, and no amount of gloss from Witter nut huggers changes the facts :)

Was the Bergman a 10 or 12 round contest?
No - it was not!

Good win by Witter - but ha it been scheduled for 10 or 12, who knows if he would have won. I think he would have BASED N HIS PERFORMANCE against Zab - but would not have thought so until then!

Zab was perceived to be higher than Witter - anyone can see that.

DG. · Post by **DG.** » 15 Feb 2008, 07:11

[quote="Captain Hook"]Totally agree, they just bang on about Witter because they hate Ricky Hatton, having no idea of Witter's effing career and having never been to watch the boring pudendum.

He won a maximum two rounds against Zab Judah because he was a fanny. He was not a novice. He was into his twenties and given a golden oportunity. He bottled it.

Now he needs the cash because his career has been a non-event and he is calling out one of our best weeks after he has just been knocked out.

Give me a break.[/quote

You been smoking that crap again?

Witter took the fight and WE KNOW HATTON WOLD NOT EVEN NOW!

Being in your 20's has nothing to do with it, its about career progression.

Naz was world champ at 21? - Johnny Nelson???? - its about career experience.

Anyway, how can a Gay Pirate lecture anyone on Boxing?

Captain Hook? - wtf!

DG. · Post by **DG.** » 15 Feb 2008, 07:17

tonyevs wrote:I’ve never really been able to buy into the excuse Witters people give to the Judah loss.

The only slight excuse they may have is that he had only 17 previous fights as opposed to Zab who’d had 23 previous.

Witter had been a pro 3yrs and 5mths.
Judah had been pro about 4ths longer.

Witter was 26yrs old.
Judah was 22yrs old.

Both guys were scheduled to fight – so the late notice change would have affected Zab worse than Witter I’d think. Because wasn’t he supposed to be fighting an orthodox type fighter? .. not an unorthodox switch-hitter.

Watching the fight again - it’s the same Junior Witter of today, I didn’t see anything he left out when fighting Judah that he does now.

Its not about age or amount of fights. Its about what you have faced in your career. Witter fought for the WORLD TITLE on short notice

Roy Francis | judge: George Colon 112-116 | judge: John Coyle 111-118 | judge: Victorio Urzo 110-118 ~
~ IBF light welterweight title ~

HOW DO YOU THINK HATTON WOULD HAVE DONE ON THE SAME NIGHT?

The Hatton arse brigade would say he would have won!

Thaxton have Hatton hell, Judah would have knocked Hatton OUT.

Captain Hook · Post by **Captain Hook** » 15 Feb 2008, 07:19

DG. wrote:
Captain Hook wrote:Totally agree, they just bang on about Witter because they hate Ricky Hatton, having no idea of Witter's effing career and having never been to watch the boring pudendum.

He won a maximum two rounds against Zab Judah because he was a fanny. He was not a novice. He was into his twenties and given a golden oportunity. He bottled it.

Now he needs the cash because his career has been a non-event and he is calling out one of our best weeks after he has just been knocked out.

Give me a break.[/quote

You been smoking that crap again?

Witter took the fight and WE KNOW HATTON WOLD NOT EVEN NOW!

Being in your 20's has nothing to do with it, its about career progression.

Naz was world champ at 21? - Johnny Nelson???? - its about career experience.

Anyway, how can a Gay Pirate lecture anyone on Boxing?

Captain Hook? - wtf!

Does this guy know something about me that I don't?

Or is it a come-on?

If I'm seen to be arguing with you, people might get the idea that this debate is a two-way thing, rather than one man with a valid point and another masturbating in a dark room with a photo of Junior Witter sellotaped to his leg.

Goz · Post by **Goz** » 15 Feb 2008, 07:19

DG. wrote:
Zab was perceived to be higher than Witter - anyone can see that.

Mayweather was perceived to be 'higher' than Hatton but it hasn't stopped you creaming yourself about PBFs win for the past 2 months.

And at least Hatton had a go....

Captain Hook · Post by **Captain Hook** » 15 Feb 2008, 07:19

I think we're banging our head against a brick wall, will leave them to it....

DG. · Post by **DG.** » 15 Feb 2008, 07:38

Goz wrote:
DG. wrote:
Zab was perceived to be higher than Witter - anyone can see that.

Mayweather was perceived to be 'higher' than Hatton but it hasn't stopped you creaming yourself about PBFs win for the past 2 months.

And at least Hatton had a go....

Goz, everyone with any knowledge of Boxing KNEW that PBF was going to batter Hatton, it was Hattons money fight!

Mayweather was not only PERCEIVED to be higher than HATTON - he IS!

I laugh at the idiots who bought into the Hatton MYTH that he is some kind of Roberto Duran pressure fighter.

Hatton had a go? Hatton ONLY HAS ONE WAY TO FIGHT!

Had a go? - for $20M he should have a GO!

PLUS HATTONS BULLSHIT TAKES THE PISS OUT OF EVEN HIS DIE-HARD FANS!

As for Captain HOOK. Have you even watched the Witter fight?

You guys KNOW HATTON IS A BULLSHITTER!

Witter is the Champion, fight him.

DG. · Post by **DG.** » 15 Feb 2008, 07:41

Captain Hook wrote:
DG. wrote:
Captain Hook wrote:Totally agree, they just bang on about Witter because they hate Ricky Hatton, having no idea of Witter's effing career and having never been to watch the boring pudendum.

He won a maximum two rounds against Zab Judah because he was a fanny. He was not a novice. He was into his twenties and given a golden oportunity. He bottled it.

Now he needs the cash because his career has been a non-event and he is calling out one of our best weeks after he has just been knocked out.

Give me a break.[/quote

You been smoking that crap again?

Witter took the fight and WE KNOW HATTON WOLD NOT EVEN NOW!

Being in your 20's has nothing to do with it, its about career progression.

Naz was world champ at 21? - Johnny Nelson???? - its about career experience.

Anyway, how can a Gay Pirate lecture anyone on Boxing?

Captain Hook? - wtf!

Does this guy know something about me that I don't?

Or is it a come-on?

If I'm seen to be arguing with you, people might get the idea that this debate is a two-way thing, rather than one man with a valid point and another masturbating in a dark room with a photo of Junior Witter sellotaped to his leg.

You sheep shaggers have such a way with words.

You know nothing about boxing, mate.

I do not argue with the likes of you, I just explain to you the finer points of the sport in an attempt to open your eyes to what is glaringly obvious.

Witters Career a Non event?

British( Lonsdale Belt Outright)
Commonwealth
European
WBC World Champion.

Non-event?

Apart from KT - ALL HATTONS BELTS were against weak PAPER CHAMPS.

I rate conquering your continent and then the world they way to go and far better than 177 WBU Title defences!

D

tonyevs · Post by **tonyevs** » 15 Feb 2008, 07:58

Its all about opinions .. right or wrong - we no doubt believe what we write here.
If you don`t agree with somebodies opinion them try to argue it in a commonsensical fashion ..

DG - aren`t you the same person who helped Doghouse go down the drain with your brainless remarks and insults?

DG. · Post by **DG.** » 15 Feb 2008, 08:09

tonyevs wrote:Its all about opinions .. right or wrong - we no doubt believe what we write here.
If you don`t agree with somebodies opinion them try to argue it in a commonsensical fashion ..

DG - aren`t you the same person who helped Doghouse go down the drain with your brainless remarks and insults?

Goz, do not be so daft, I made many a popular thread!

And if you knew anything then you would know the reason for the mass exodus is due to the excessive ads and (some say) virus loaded pop ups.

You take yourself far to seriously!

My threads seem to get the people talking, regardless of the content - it is good to debate!

Insults? - moi?

Why dont you Ginger Chambers and Captain HOok get a room?

Chambers2 · Post by **Chambers2** » 15 Feb 2008, 08:16

tonyevs wrote:Its all about opinions .. right or wrong - we no doubt believe what we write here.
If you don`t agree with somebodies opinion them try to argue it in a commonsensical fashion ..

DG - aren`t you the same person who helped Doghouse go down the drain with your brainless remarks and insults?

As you can tell DG has the mental age of an 8 year old (who's abit special)

DG. · Post by **DG.** » 15 Feb 2008, 08:21

Chambers2 wrote:
tonyevs wrote:Its all about opinions .. right or wrong - we no doubt believe what we write here.
If you don`t agree with somebodies opinion them try to argue it in a commonsensical fashion ..

DG - aren`t you the same person who helped Doghouse go down the drain with your brainless remarks and insults?
As you can tell DG has the mental age of an 8 year old (who's abit special)

We should get on well then!

J · Post by J » 15 Feb 2008, 08:35

Chambers2 wrote:
tonyevs wrote:Its all about opinions .. right or wrong - we no doubt believe what we write here.
If you don`t agree with somebodies opinion them try to argue it in a commonsensical fashion ..

DG - aren`t you the same person who helped Doghouse go down the drain with your brainless remarks and insults?
As you can tell DG has the mental age of an 8 year old (who's abit special)

ITS CALLED COMPLEX NEEDS THESE DAYS APPARENTLY.

yo from rotterdam chaps by the way.

Poncey · Post by **Poncey** » 15 Feb 2008, 08:35

I play with my own poop

Wrists · Post by **Wrists** » 15 Feb 2008, 08:40

So glad my topic had over 100 replies!!!!

Lovin that!!!!

I think we are all agreed Hatton and Witter should fight - my take is that Hatton deserves praise and maybe a gimme fight before it happens.

As I started this can I be the one to finish it

LOL

Wrists

PS. walking in a keegan wonderland!!!

DG. · Post by **DG.** » 15 Feb 2008, 08:40

Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:I play with my own poop

Don't let Ginger Knobrot (Chambers) hear you say that, he will ask to join in!

Poncey · Post by **Poncey** » 15 Feb 2008, 08:41

Wrists wrote:So glad my topic had over 100 replies!!!!

Lovin that!!!!

I think we are all agreed Hatton and Witter should fight - my take is that Hatton deserves praise and maybe a gimme fight before it happens.

As I started this can I be the one to finish it

LOL

Wrists

PS. walking in a keegan wonderland!!!

If you could arrange for it to be locked, that would be super-cool.

We need to collectively move on and have a group hug.

It's getting boring.

Chambers2 · Post by **Chambers2** » 15 Feb 2008, 09:00

In conclusion, Hatton shouldn't be called childish names as he's been very good for British Boxing, but he should be fighting Junior asap for the sake of British Boxing and its fans and to continue British Boxings remarkable past year. If he doesn't it will and should affect his overall legacy.

NUFF SAID