IS BBC BOXING IS FINISHED?

Lugh · Post by **Lugh** » 04 Feb 2004, 09:41

nasty wrote:Hey LUGH, are you that Cu#t allegedly?

This is the LAST TIME I'M SAYING THIS SO LISTEN VERY CAREFULLY!

Let me tell you that the BBC is fully behind boxing and plans to inject more money into it in 2004 THAN 2003.

Also, it see's the return of MOTD as a perfect way to launch LIVE BOXING.

This is how it will work :

MOTD - 10.OO PM till 11.15pm
LIVE BOXING - 11.15pm till 1.00pm

SO STOP SPREADING RUMOURS THAT THE BBC IS SCRAPPING BOXING. IT'S 100% BEHIND BOXING!

It see's Boxing and Football as a perfect combination to bring back BBC SPORT TO THE TOP AGAIN!

Any more SLANDER about BBC commitment to BOXING will not be TOLERATED!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2004 WILL BE THE YEAR OF MIKE TYSON
http://www.doghouseboxing.com/Parodies/Mike_Tyson.html
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HELP SAVE AMERICA FROM G.W.BUSH
VOTE FOR THE GREATEST PRESIDENT AMERICA WILL EVER HAVE!
VOTE GOV. HOWARD DEAN FOR PRESIDENT IN 2004
http://www.deanforamerica.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Colonial Simpleton.

I will say whatever I like, whenever I like, Window-Licker, and I don't need to get your say so

I understand that you will find this complicated as you are American - I'll try to keep this to as few syllables as possible:

Slander? - Read the post you Moron and then point out the slanderous statement - you won't find one - there isn't one and you have just proved that you don't understand what slander means - NICE.

My QUESTION (do you understand that??? - That's...... QUESTION) was "is BBC Boxing finished?"

Please explain the slander.............

.....I am waiting

..........still waiting

(Oh come on, it can't take anyone that long to look up slander in the dictionary).

And as far as "Will not be TOLERATED"

Or what?

Are you going to be rude to me again?

But what will I do? How will I survive? How will I sleep?

Goz · Post by **Goz** » 04 Feb 2004, 09:48

stujones wrote: But Calzaghe is a very good looking guy

Backs to the walls boys....

Goz · Post by **Goz** » 04 Feb 2004, 09:50

I don't think Nasty is American, his knwoledge of the BBC, ITV and Sky is way too extensive for this to be the case. If he were a septic then his research qualities would be commendable but alas he is quite obviously far too simple for that.

Could be someone we know on the wind up though?

stujones · Post by **stujones** » 04 Feb 2004, 09:51

Goz wrote:
stujones wrote: But Calzaghe is a very good looking guy
Backs to the walls boys....

You know what I meant, he's no Jason or Nicky Booth is he.

Lugh · Post by **Lugh** » 04 Feb 2004, 09:56

Goz wrote:I don't think Nasty is American

Why is he so fu****g thick then?

If he is a Brit, then whats all that Yank stuff on his signature?

A Brit with an unhealthy interest in the US?

It's Johnathan King - no wonder he is angry - Kiddyfiddler.

jamesmcdonnell · Post by **jamesmcdonnell** » 04 Feb 2004, 10:15

Is it just me or is Nasty obsessed with Question of sport, I'm beginning to think it's a drunken Sue Barker, railing against the world with a bottle of gin and a fag.....

nasty · Post by **nasty** » 04 Feb 2004, 11:23

Just to let you know.

I'm a American who has spent part's of his life in England. I spent 3 years at the University of Plymouth and loved every moment there.

Although I knew a little bit about british boxing before i came here, my appreciation of it became bigger when i was here. I still remember the Nigel benn vs McClenen fight vividly!

Since than, I've stayed in touch with the scene and got my Monthly Tapes of British boxing sent to me from a guy in Manchester.

Let me ask you this, I bet lot's of you guys follow the American fight scene so why do you guys not allow an American to follow your scene?

My views about british boxing are based on various articles I READ AND Insider KNOWLEDGE. I also love to read BOXING MONTHLY.

Also i've exchanged emails with the head of BBC boxing when he requested feedback.

Compared to the OVER THE TOP style of american boxing coverage, I love the coverage the BBC have brought to boxing. It is more intellectual and up market.

Also i was very impressed with audley and it was great to see him on ESPN.

Some of my comments may piss you guys off but American's are confrontational by nature!

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2004 WILL BE THE YEAR OF MIKE TYSON
http://www.doghouseboxing.com/Parodies/Mike_Tyson.html
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HELP SAVE AMERICA FROM G.W.BUSH
VOTE FOR THE GREATEST PRESIDENT AMERICA WILL EVER HAVE!
VOTE GOV. HOWARD DEAN FOR PRESIDENT IN 2004
http://www.deanforamerica.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

red dragon · Post by **red dragon** » 04 Feb 2004, 19:14

it's great that the BBC are showing a lot of good boxing these days,but i do get pissed of with them for not putting a 2 hour show instead of the
90 minute shows they put on as i would like to see more of the fights
on the undercard,i'm a bif fan of carl thompson,and if the woods v
johnson fight on friday goes the full 12 rounds we will not get to see
much of his fight,am i right in saying that thompson fights for a
world title on friday.

red dragon

silkov · Post by **silkov** » 04 Feb 2004, 19:41

Good point Red Dragon... Woods ve Johnson is certain to go the distance I think (Woods will be making a big mistake if he thinks he can ko Johnson) and so that means we will probably only get highlights of Thompson vs Rothmann... and that bound to be a thriller... I ve never seen Carl in anything resembling a boring fight!...

jamesmcdonnell · Post by **jamesmcdonnell** » 04 Feb 2004, 20:08

There's always the chance that Woods gets stopped though.

steve689 · Post by **steve689** » 05 Feb 2004, 14:05

2 Hours of Boxing? Don't be daft, we would all miss our vital installment of the learning zone which it would run into. And then how would we know about atoms, climate changes and the Bengali cotton trade 8) Apologies i work nightshift

silkov · Post by **silkov** » 05 Feb 2004, 15:15

catweazle · Post by **catweazle** » 05 Feb 2004, 15:42

Nasty you are a complete prick. I've just read your history of posts and its total shite.Dont make me hold a vote on it or you'll be sadly embaressed.As for trying to slag me off and telling me to fornicate off,you show TOTAL AND COMPLETE ignorance and intellect.Your a discredit to your country and sport.I never threaten anyone but if I ever have the misfortune to meet you,you'll be dealt with in an appropriate manner.
Good day to you,sir.

nasty · Post by **nasty** » 05 Feb 2004, 15:50

If you are CATWEAZLE the Boxer than your a PISS POOR BOXER who I'd KO in 1 round.

Pick on someone you might be able to beat like a STRAWWEIGHT!

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2004 WILL BE THE YEAR OF MIKE TYSON
http://www.doghouseboxing.com/Parodies/Mike_Tyson.html
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fornicate THAT HORSE FACED FAKE JOHN KERRY
VOTE FOR THE GREATEST PRESIDENT AMERICA WILL EVER HAVE!
VOTE DOCTOR HOWARD DEAN FOR PRESIDENT IN 2004
http://www.deanforamerica.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

jamesmcdonnell · Post by **jamesmcdonnell** » 05 Feb 2004, 15:52

So Nasty, are you a professional boxer as well as a professional donut?

nasty · Post by **nasty** » 05 Feb 2004, 16:00

no, i'm not a professional boxer but a very good amateur!

I chose to go to university when I had the chance to turn pro and I REGRET IT EVERY DAY OF MY LIFE!

I now work with training kid's and teaching them some computer stuff as well but it isn't the same!

I considering turning pro within the next 6 months but I'LL BE VERY HONEST with myself and if I don't at least get to within a Title shot than I won't bother!

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2004 WILL BE THE YEAR OF MIKE TYSON
http://www.doghouseboxing.com/Parodies/Mike_Tyson.html
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fornicate THAT HORSE FACED FAKE JOHN KERRY
VOTE FOR THE GREATEST PRESIDENT AMERICA WILL EVER HAVE!
VOTE DOCTOR HOWARD DEAN FOR PRESIDENT IN 2004
http://www.deanforamerica.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

catweazle · Post by **catweazle** » 05 Feb 2004, 16:23

Oh Nasty, Your gonna have to put up ur shut up mate. You'd better get yourself down to my gym and we'll get it on ! Im not joking,this time !
I work at Gleasons on Tanner st. so DO get in touch. Its a open house to ALL Bopxrec members ! Who'd like to run a book (large donation to charity I say) ???

REAL_DEAL · Post by **REAL_DEAL** » 05 Feb 2004, 16:25

ben why did you retire?

catweazle · Post by **catweazle** » 05 Feb 2004, 16:31

I retired because I felt that I'd done enough and it was time to move on.I was the only ever Cambridge Blue to become a Pro'!
I'm still involved in the game and you'll be seeing more of me very soon !

silkov · Post by **silkov** » 05 Feb 2004, 18:20

Nasty I'm afraid you've been watching too much Jerry Springer!.....

Lugh · Post by **Lugh** » 06 Feb 2004, 07:43

Will their be tickets available for the upcoming Catweazle-Nasty bout?

I'd like to see it (all tens seconds

)

Nasty - from the general tone of you posts I had assumed that you were quite young (let's say 13 or 14) - are you really at University?

Goz · Post by **Goz** » 06 Feb 2004, 07:49

nasty wrote: I chose to go to university when I had the chance to turn pro and I REGRET IT EVERY DAY OF MY LIFE!

So you should, your education was quite obviously appalling.

silkov · Post by **silkov** » 06 Feb 2004, 08:02

catweazle · Post by **catweazle** » 07 Feb 2004, 22:46

Americans are confontational by nature,Nasty says so.Watch out James,Donut eatin' kiddie-fiddler is comin' to get ya !

Ulysses · Post by **Ulysses** » 08 Feb 2004, 08:16

catweazle wrote:I retired because I felt that I'd done enough and it was time to move on.I was the only ever Cambridge Blue to become a Pro'!
I'm still involved in the game and you'll be seeing more of me very soon !

I thought you may've faniced a rematch with Chas Symonds, incidently what's your take on him? do you rate him?

IS BBC BOXING IS FINISHED?

BBC BOXING

Nasty

nasty

Retire...

Nasty..

Re: Retire...