Are you offering me a job!jim wright wrote:Thanks for the answers Coco, are you still involved in the game? your insights are pretty interesting, have you ever thought about doing a bit of writing?
Jim
Peter Buckley retires?
You do not need to be a fighter to have an opinion but I think BP would have a much more realistic opinion in this respect, if he had had some fighting experience. Especially when he lowers himself to throwing insults when I put forward my position.Maelstrom wrote:Coco. I appreciate you were once a boxer, but I think saying Big Pussy is just a keyboad warrior is a bit unfair.Coco wrote:What part of my statement was a cliche? Clearly you don't care.Big Pussy wrote: Take your tired cliches and tell them to someone who cares.
I am someone who funds their purse (through tickets and PPV) so if I want to question whether they put everything on the line, I will.
Idiot.
And clearly you do not understand what it is to put yourself on the line in a boxing ring.
Furthermore I do take exception to being called an idiot, I get the impression you are another keyboard warrior who is merely brave enough to throw insults at proud, real warriors and forum members through the brutal medium of the internet
He is entitled to an opinion. And it is one I agree with. Pete Buckley has not put anything on the line in over 200 fights. He turns up, survives, collects his £1000-2000, then drives home. That is, unless, he realises he is not in against a proper prospect and starts to fancy the job.
He is a survivor. Dressing it up as anything else is bullshit. I have far more respect for fighters who are seen as journeymen, but actually try in EVERY fight. Take Alan Bosworth. A TRUE warrior, who put everything on the line, in EVERY fight.
You do not need to be a fighter to have an opinion fighting. As BP says, that is an absolute cliche.
What BP deserves stick for is his name.
If you fight only a few times a year, like Bosworth it is much easier to have his style.
I do not disagree that Buckley has been a survivor in recent times, but just to survive in the pro boxing ring is very hard, and you need that warrior mentality to do that. This is where many non-boxers show a lack of knowledge as they feel surviving is just a walk in the park.
And I for one can't criticise BP's name as I called myself Too Cute!
so are you telling me people have shown him no weaknesses for many years, since its many years since peter buckley 'had' anyone.Terry D wrote:We can make jokes about Peter not giving his all but as mentioned he has saved many a show. Some journeymen go for it and others don't. Peter reminds me of a 12-year old dog, quiet enough but mess with him or show weakness and he will have you. I saw him box Shinny Bayeer in Shaw and Shinny tried slapping the hell out of Buckley and Peter did open up a little bit more.
If a show was a fighter down who else are you gonna call? You could ask people in the audience if they fancy stepping in for a fight and, bravado aside, the result would be floors awash with piss as everyone decided they'd rather not.
TV punters generally want KO's but I would say a lot of people at smaller shows want 6 rounds or more to get their money out of it. Often you could miss the KO but a well contested 6-rounder gives you lots of action.
i have probably seen buckley fight live a dozen times, only once have i seen him half try, and that was against a debutant ben hudson. and buckley managed a draw.
its a disgrace how he goes about his business, the cross arm guard and the constant retreat, he is like the italian army FFS.
im being honest, and ill tell you straight, i will not be sorry to see the back of him, and i think recently the promoters have been of the same opinion because his work has dried up over the last 18 months for sure.
in these hard financial times, we want a boxing match to at least half resemble a match. look up the word 'match' in the dictionary. it will at least incinuate something that is similar or equal.
give me bosworth or the smith brothers anytime, shit...give me alvin slick miller, at least he swung his lead, and if he clocked you one you knew about it. (ask danny percival)
all in all the surviving journeymen have been exposed by the boxing public, the increase in internet traffic has also had a lot to do with it, because joe 'semi interested in boxing' public can read and feel what the real boxing fans think.
and.....we are quite a knowledgeable bunch, but we dont suffer fools, or suffer people who try to make us look fools.
peter buckley has been making the boxing public look fools, should have had his licence taken away 3 years ago !!!!
and im sorry for sitting on the fence !! ...
-
Max Molyneux
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 7084
- Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:53