The SOLUTION to the plopeater problem

banjo · Post by **banjo** » 30 Mar 2008, 10:05

so we should ignore StepinBullshit as well then?

Post by **The Law** » 30 Mar 2008, 10:12

I'll be surprised if plopeater lasts too long on the forum. If he continues to ruin threads (by trolling on them) then he will be banned.

Spud · Post by **Spud** » 30 Mar 2008, 10:44

search wrote:IGNORE HIM.

Clearly a troll and more than likely a creation of Spud, as has been done numerous times before.

If you reply to him you give him power. If you don't respond to him, he has no power. He is ruining the board because YOU are letting him do it and YOU are contributing to it ruining the board.

Do not respond to his posts. In fact, do not even read them, just skim over them.

If you reply to him you are contributing to the problem. Remember that.

I will make this and only this post under cricumstances like this - I will then return to posting about boxing.

Search,

As stated on another thread - yours and others albeit the MINORITIES digs at me is getting silly, boring and tiresome.

I do not post under any other name other than "Spud".

I am more than happy for the Owners, moderators or whoever to make the necessary checks - even involving the law if thats what will shut you up to prove I do not post under any other name on this forum.

It is very easy although at the sametime very weak and pathetic to blame "Spud" for whatever goes wrong on boxrec.

I will be making the necessay calls to the Owner and a couple of mods in the morning to finally clear up this matter.

I love boxing and do not intend to be driven away by spineless individuals who seem to think it is big to continue to think it is the done thing to start yet another boring thread and bringing my name into it - why not use your boxing knowledge to get a popular thread going - or is it simply true the only way you can make your self popular in your weird and deluded mind is by slagging me off on boxrec - I am still not going anywhere.

Thank you - and if you have the necessary boxing knowledge why not start some threads highlighting it.

Thank you

Regards

Spud

PS ... it is very easy to find out whether I am anyone else by checking the IP addresses when I post and these other culprits and then finding out the locations of those IP addresses - I more than happy for the MODs ior the owners to carry out that very simple task.

Post by **The Law** » 30 Mar 2008, 10:51

Just to confirm, Spud is not plopeater nor does Spud post via another account. Plopeater posts from a static ip address located in a totally different town to Spud.

jonp · Post by **jonp** » 30 Mar 2008, 11:11

Wasnt you Albert before tho?
Just asking because if you was you can understand people perhaps thinking you do post under other names?

TerribleTerry · Post by **TerribleTerry** » 30 Mar 2008, 13:43

jonp wrote:Wasnt you Albert before tho?
Just asking because if you was you can understand people perhaps thinking you do post under other names?

Spud has posted as both 'Albert' and 'Pepsi' on this forum in the past.

TerribleTerry · Post by **TerribleTerry** » 30 Mar 2008, 13:48

In terms of combating the influx of attention wh0ring trolls I fully agree with Search - ignore them entirely and they will get bored and go away.

If a troll doesnt get a bite from their outlandish comments they have failed and will soon look elsewhere for fresh pastures.

Post by **The Law** » 30 Mar 2008, 13:48

TerribleTerry wrote:
jonp wrote:Wasnt you Albert before tho?
Just asking because if you was you can understand people perhaps thinking you do post under other names?
Spud has posted as both 'Albert' and 'Pepsi' on this forum in the past.

I'm not sure as to what he has done in the past but at this moment in time he's only using his 'Spud' account

Post by **The Law** » 30 Mar 2008, 13:57

search wrote:
lawllb wrote:Just to confirm, Spud is not plopeater nor does Spud post via another account. Plopeater posts from a static ip address located in a totally different town to Spud.
what town?

I'm not going to mention the location of a member without their permission but you can take my word for it that they are both located in a different town/city. Furthermore, you can also ask another Mod to confirm this.

WildWaylon · Post by **WildWaylon** » 30 Mar 2008, 14:09

lawllb wrote:
TerribleTerry wrote:
jonp wrote:Wasnt you Albert before tho?
Just asking because if you was you can understand people perhaps thinking you do post under other names?
Spud has posted as both 'Albert' and 'Pepsi' on this forum in the past.
I'm not sure as to what he has done in the past but at this moment in time he's only using his 'Spud' account

The past is the past and Spud is currently using his boxing knowledge and making very good posts.

stujones · Post by **stujones** » 30 Mar 2008, 15:28

lawllb wrote:
TerribleTerry wrote:
jonp wrote:Wasnt you Albert before tho?
Just asking because if you was you can understand people perhaps thinking you do post under other names?
Spud has posted as both 'Albert' and 'Pepsi' on this forum in the past.
I'm not sure as to what he has done in the past but at this moment in time he's only using his 'Spud' account

Pepsi, Albert and Gum Shield amongst others - but yeah only been using Spud for a while - fair play.

And yep, Plopeater seems to be posting from the same PC.

He does genuinely seem to be a new member.

Post by **The Law** » 31 Mar 2008, 03:06

He has been banned, his idiocy knew no bounds.

banjo · Post by **banjo** » 31 Mar 2008, 06:02

lawllb wrote:He has been banned, his idiocy knew no bounds.

Has Mr Fetchit been banned as well?

jamesmcdonnell · Post by **jamesmcdonnell** » 31 Mar 2008, 07:23

Give spud a break (did I really say those words), he clearly is nothing to do with shitemuncher.

Post by **The Law** » 31 Mar 2008, 13:21

banjo wrote:
lawllb wrote:He has been banned, his idiocy knew no bounds.
Has Mr Fetchit been banned as well?

No.

WildWaylon · Post by **WildWaylon** » 01 Apr 2008, 16:39

lawllb wrote:
banjo wrote:
lawllb wrote:He has been banned, his idiocy knew no bounds.
Has Mr Fetchit been banned as well?
No.

He is under investigation though.

The SOLUTION to the plopeater problem

Re: The SOLUTION to the plopeater problem