Joe Calzaghe

EddieShredder
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Post by EddieShredder »

RJJ, Toney, Ottke, Catley, Lucas, Reid Rematch.... just a few fights JC should have made/taken if he wants to be considered the best brit ever.

Don't get me wrong, he's an amazing talent, and apart from RJJ, i think he could/would have won all of the above fights - these guys were all world champs during Joe's reign, and whilst not hall of famers, were a lot better than the competition Joe's faced for the majority of his career.

The Lacy and Kessler wins are very good, and make it all the more annoying - because it shows that even at an advanced age, Joe has what it takes at the highest level. If he's actually been and beaten the other belt holders earlier in his career... his legacy would be infinately better.

Despite him "coming good" now.... for me, Joe's been a waste of talent, and his attitude stinks. Imagine his talent, and Haye's drive for success :o

Joe's missed the boat to be considered an all time great IMO.

And as for Britains best ever..... Lennox Lewis. No doubt.
Spud
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Post by Spud »

EddieShredder wrote:Joe's missed the boat to be considered an all time great IMO.

And as for Britains best ever..... Lennox Lewis. No doubt.
Completely agreed with both statements!!!

Frustrating about Calzaghe though - after all the years of me criticising him - he finally beat a quality top, top, fighter in Kessler unfortunately has it come all too late?
theHitman
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27
Joined: 05 Nov 2007, 21:29

Post by theHitman »

Joe has finally woken up and he has revenged a lot in recent couple of years. However, overall he should have been thrown out there much sooner.

Personally I think he may have given RJJ his first defeat. Roy is not so unorthodox as Joe he is just very fast at was he does - and has some spectacular moves. Joe's style however is just not even boxing - it is something change and he can change it a gazillion times during a fight if he really needs to.

I think a 30+ year old Joe would have beaten Roy. A 20-29 year old Joe might not have because he fought a little too much with his heart and not enough with his head back then.

But afterall we should be happy that he did find the balls to run it up - better late than never.
Greg Nicholas
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 516
Joined: 22 Oct 2005, 19:21

Post by Greg Nicholas »

he says Eubank, Lacy and Kessler are his greatest wins.. i agree with Stp that they all stood in front of him on those nights.. and plus JC was on home soil and the others werent.. he shipped about 200 right hands from washed up versions of Reid and Woodhall.. what would an Rjj who would have used all the cutest angles and could lead right in a blink of an eye have done..?? look how awful JC looks against fighters who didnt lead eg Starie, so if Rjj didnt lead.. he was a little better than the likes of David Starie.. Brewer and Mitchell were limited old oafs who liked to trade and both gave JC hell.. Sakio Bika was extremely limited.. this man is over rated..
Greg Nicholas
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 516
Joined: 22 Oct 2005, 19:21

Post by Greg Nicholas »

the general British public genuinely believe that Joe Calzaghe is the greatest and best boxer of all time.. it is a disgrace that the media fell head over hills in love with him after both the Lacy and Kessler fights and terribly over rated him..
yiddo14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Post by yiddo14 »

Greg Nicholas wrote:the general British public genuinely believe that Joe Calzaghe is the greatest and best boxer of all time.. it is a disgrace that the media fell head over hills in love with him after both the Lacy and Kessler fights and terribly over rated him..
The general British public believe Henry cooper is the greatest and best boxer of all time mate!

It's pretty clear form on here the average Britsh boxing fan KNOWS Joe isn't the greatest British fighter of all time. Infact, he is behind quite a few(Wilde, who is arguably the greatest ever p4p fighter, Lewis, Welsh, Buchanan, Kid Lewis, Fitzimmons amongst others)

The man has bags of talent, but did it all wrong.
He should have been retired by now, having had 3 or 4 massive fights in the US, with tens of millions in the bank.
So he might have had one or two lossess on his record(Roy Jones and James Toney)but his legacy would be secure.

As it is, he is still talking about legacy and making money at the age of 36.
Spud
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Post by Spud »

Whilst I think the media and public went way over the top about Calzaghe after the Lacy fight - I honestly believe the Kessler fight was a very very good performance against a bloody good fighter who in my opinion was very under rated.
Twinkle Toes
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3335
Joined: 22 Sep 2003, 08:38

Post by Twinkle Toes »

Always been a big Calzaghe fan, but he has wasted most of his career fighting in silly cash milking defence's.

He could have been a superstar.
Greg Nicholas
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 516
Joined: 22 Oct 2005, 19:21

Post by Greg Nicholas »

He could never have been a superstar because he doesnt have the -or any- personality and isnt outgoing enough.. people say ITV etc.. but he HAS been on ITV..!
yiddo14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Post by yiddo14 »

Greg Nicholas wrote:He could never have been a superstar because he doesnt have the -or any- personality and isnt outgoing enough.. people say ITV etc.. but he HAS been on ITV..!
Then again Mayweather is hardly Mr Charasmatic. He has played his role well, but lacks genuine star quality.

Joe could have played the arrogant Welsh fella(would not have been too hard for him :wink: ) that has come over to spank the Yanks!

He may never have made superstar status, but he would have earned tonnes of wonga and be revered by Boxing fans the world over.
Greg Nicholas
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 516
Joined: 22 Oct 2005, 19:21

Post by Greg Nicholas »

i agree with Gomez that you cant put Calzaghe in the bracket of Nigel Benn.. Calzaghes been a pro for 15 yrs and only in his previous and next fight has he stepped up to the plate.. Benn was a pro for 9 yrs and went to war with everyone -GMan, Collins, Watson, Wharton, Eubank, Barkley, De Witt, Simms- he could all over the world ffs.. got his WBC strap and defended it 10 times or whatever, JC wont defend his first real world title once.. won a world title in US after 3 yrs.. JC has taken 15 yrs..

just what is Mikkel Kessler..? i mean really.. a 2006 version of Markus Beyer, Linbrado Andrade..? hardly Rjj, Mugabi, Julian Jackson, Benn etc who GMan anihilated.. hardly Tommy Hearns who De Witt and Barkley gave everything he could handle and more.. hardly a pre Watson Eubank..
Greg Nicholas
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 516
Joined: 22 Oct 2005, 19:21

Post by Greg Nicholas »

yiddo14 wrote:
Greg Nicholas wrote:He could never have been a superstar because he doesnt have the -or any- personality and isnt outgoing enough.. people say ITV etc.. but he HAS been on ITV..!
Then again Mayweather is hardly Mr Charasmatic. He has played his role well, but lacks genuine star quality.

Joe could have played the arrogant Welsh fella(would not have been too hard for him :wink: ) that has come over to spank the Yanks!

He may never have made superstar status, but he would have earned tonnes of wonga and be revered by Boxing fans the world over.
ODLH made Floyd.. before that fight he wasnt selling 300,000 ppv's.. it made the front cover of US sports illustrated as the fight that would 'save boxing'..

maybe if Calzaghe beat Eubank on ITV in 1995.. and was as outgoing as Floyd..
fist
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 520
Joined: 01 May 2003, 06:04

Post by fist »

In my opinion Calzaghe is the best fighter to come out of Britain. All the resume critics dont bother me. I always knew he would beat Kessler. As some people have stated on this site, Joe is better than his resume. That said, he's proved he's the best at SMW, amazing feat to unify in this day and age. I think his win over Kessler is a key fight in that it stopped an awsome fighter in his tracks, from becoming possibly one of the top pound for pound fighters. And of course, it solidified Joe's position at SMW as the very best. I really dont think there are many people around for him now. He's proved he's the best and there are no boxers on the horizon who are a major threat. They were all eradicated at SMW either directly through Joe, or by beating the person that beat the person. Mind you, know reason why he cant clean up at LHW.

I think the other thing is that Joe is one of the most exciting fighters to come out of Britain, not in Naz's league, but exhitlerating to watch - speed and fury. I personally like his showboating and his propensity to get into a proper frenzied scrap when he gets tagged. Proper fighting! Mind you, have to admire his adaptability, jab, movement, combos, ability to fight inside and out... He's got the lot.

As for Lennox Lewis..couldnt stand him, boring fighter, who looked like he was bored himself! Joe is leagues above lennox in terms of skill and entertainment.
EddieShredder
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Post by EddieShredder »

fist wrote: As for Lennox Lewis..couldnt stand him, boring fighter, who looked like he was bored himself! Joe is leagues above lennox in terms of skill and entertainment.
Joe had the opportunity over the years to prove that though, and his hesitancy/refusal to seek out the best fights and challenges available leaves him miles behind Lewis in terms of legacy.

Like Spud, thats what I find so annoying.... especially now he's confirmed that his talent was for real with his big recent wins. Bottom line is that Joe should, and would have gone done as an all time great had he left his comfort zone, and taken some very winnable challenges against the other sm belt holders over the last 10 years. Too many fights against journeymen, and sub-world-class opposition.

Lewis cleaned out the heavyweights, beat everyone he's faced as a pro, showed heart, focus and determination by avenging two KO losses in more devastating fashion - leaving no doubt as to who was the better fighter. He beat every fighter of note in his division over his era (bar Bowe, who refused the fight), and holds wins over at least 2 all time great heavyweights in Tyson and Holyfield, as well as very good wins over many other credible opponents.

In terms of class of opposition, achievements in the sport, defining fights, and legacy, Lewis is leaps and bounds ahead of Calzaghe. Talent and skill wise, Joe might be better - but he's never proved he deserves to be considered in the same vein.... it's his own lack of desire and drive which will cost him ultimately.

Too little, too late.
fist
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 520
Joined: 01 May 2003, 06:04

Post by fist »

EddieShredder wrote:
fist wrote: As for Lennox Lewis..couldnt stand him, boring fighter, who looked like he was bored himself! Joe is leagues above lennox in terms of skill and entertainment.
Joe had the opportunity over the years to prove that though, and his hesitancy/refusal to seek out the best fights and challenges available leaves him miles behind Lewis in terms of legacy.

Like Spud, thats what I find so annoying.... especially now he's confirmed that his talent was for real with his big recent wins. Bottom line is that Joe should, and would have gone done as an all time great had he left his comfort zone, and taken some very winnable challenges against the other sm belt holders over the last 10 years. Too many fights against journeymen, and sub-world-class opposition.

Lewis cleaned out the heavyweights, beat everyone he's faced as a pro, showed heart, focus and determination by avenging two KO losses in more devastating fashion - leaving no doubt as to who was the better fighter. He beat every fighter of note in his division over his era (bar Bowe, who refused the fight), and holds wins over at least 2 all time great heavyweights in Tyson and Holyfield, as well as very good wins over many other credible opponents.

In terms of class of opposition, achievements in the sport, defining fights, and legacy, Lewis is leaps and bounds ahead of Calzaghe. Talent and skill wise, Joe might be better - but he's never proved he deserves to be considered in the same vein.... it's his own lack of desire and drive which will cost him ultimately.

Too little, too late.
Thats your opinion mate and I respect that, but for me, Im happy with what he's achieved - he's undefeated, unlike Lewis, and he's proven he's the very best at SMW. For me, he's head and shoulders above Lewis. And yes, for me, he is an ATG. He secured that status when he took kessler's zero and unfied the division. I can't think of any fighter in the world at his weight who would beat him. Thats my view.
EddieShredder
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Post by EddieShredder »

fist wrote:
EddieShredder wrote:
fist wrote: As for Lennox Lewis..couldnt stand him, boring fighter, who looked like he was bored himself! Joe is leagues above lennox in terms of skill and entertainment.
Joe had the opportunity over the years to prove that though, and his hesitancy/refusal to seek out the best fights and challenges available leaves him miles behind Lewis in terms of legacy.

Like Spud, thats what I find so annoying.... especially now he's confirmed that his talent was for real with his big recent wins. Bottom line is that Joe should, and would have gone done as an all time great had he left his comfort zone, and taken some very winnable challenges against the other sm belt holders over the last 10 years. Too many fights against journeymen, and sub-world-class opposition.

Lewis cleaned out the heavyweights, beat everyone he's faced as a pro, showed heart, focus and determination by avenging two KO losses in more devastating fashion - leaving no doubt as to who was the better fighter. He beat every fighter of note in his division over his era (bar Bowe, who refused the fight), and holds wins over at least 2 all time great heavyweights in Tyson and Holyfield, as well as very good wins over many other credible opponents.

In terms of class of opposition, achievements in the sport, defining fights, and legacy, Lewis is leaps and bounds ahead of Calzaghe. Talent and skill wise, Joe might be better - but he's never proved he deserves to be considered in the same vein.... it's his own lack of desire and drive which will cost him ultimately.

Too little, too late.
Thats your opinion mate and I respect that, but for me, Im happy with what he's achieved - he's undefeated, unlike Lewis, and he's proven he's the very best at SMW. For me, he's head and shoulders above Lewis. And yes, for me, he is an ATG. He secured that status when he took kessler's zero and unfied the division. I can't think of any fighter in the world at his weight who would beat him. Thats my view.
I agree with you that NOW there is no fighter in or around super middle who would beat JC. However, his dominance has only been confirmed in the last 2 years, since the Lacy victory.

Lewis was arguably the no1 heavyweight for nearly 10 years, and certainly for over 5 years since the Holyfield fights to his retirement. His resume has every notable heavy of his era on it.... compare that to Calzaghes, and there are too many gaps - too many big name fighters - who whilst they might not have beaten Joe, were certainly better challenges for him than half the opposition he faced.

Calzaghe is the best SM out there now, granted, and has unified his division. BUT, only recently.

In my opinion, for his to be considered in the same vein as Lewis, he would have needed to fight/beat much better opposition over the whole of his 10 year world title "reign", rather than just two big names at the end. :TU:

EDIT: Perhaps I should add, that personally, one of the criteria I look for in a "great" fighter, is the desire, drive and willingness to fight the best available opposition, in their own back yard, and on their terms if necessary. Having the skills and talent is only one part of being a great imo.
yiddo14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Post by yiddo14 »

Lewis not only achieved more than Calzaghe, and his legacy will be far greater but I believe he had more talent too.

I like boxers who think. Lewis had more in his locker than Calzaghe, who relies a lot on workrate.

Both are behind Jimmy Wilde anyway, and it's an insult to suggest Calzaghe is Britains finest ever boxer, when he isn't even Wales' finest ever boxer!
Spud
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Post by Spud »

Lennox Lewis is up there by far as the No1 in my view.

Calzaghe as much as I hate to write it - is in the mix - not as Number 1 but he has to be in the top 5.
STP
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 937
Joined: 26 Feb 2007, 08:38

Post by STP »

He didn't fight Liles, Brewer (when he was IBF champion), Echols, Johnson or any of the best Americans, and won't fight Dawson. He is nowhere near.
Spud
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Post by Spud »

STP wrote:He didn't fight Liles, Brewer (when he was IBF champion), Echols, Johnson or any of the best Americans, and won't fight Dawson. He is nowhere near.
Kessler was a dam good result - and trust me on this watch the media go into over drive in their endless reams of sh*t they will write if Calzaghe does a number on Hopkins - a 43 year old!!! - I don't care how good he is or was!!! - at 43 he is certainly not at his best!!!
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Post by Autobarn »

Calzaghe's had a very good couple of years. But he and his team really have seemed to take the piss at times.
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Post by whiskey »

There is more excitement in this one round of Benn vs Barkley than in Joe's career.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=Yoq_keFIpSI
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Post by whiskey »

And if that didn't close any arguments... the opener of Benn vs the G-man.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=Yoq_keFIpSI
fist
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 520
Joined: 01 May 2003, 06:04

Post by fist »

Terry D wrote:
fist wrote:In my opinion Calzaghe is the best fighter to come out of Britain. All the resume critics dont bother me. I always knew he would beat Kessler. As some people have stated on this site, Joe is better than his resume. That said, he's proved he's the best at SMW, amazing feat to unify in this day and age. I think his win over Kessler is a key fight in that it stopped an awsome fighter in his tracks, from becoming possibly one of the top pound for pound fighters. And of course, it solidified Joe's position at SMW as the very best. I really dont think there are many people around for him now. He's proved he's the best and there are no boxers on the horizon who are a major threat. They were all eradicated at SMW either directly through Joe, or by beating the person that beat the person. Mind you, know reason why he cant clean up at LHW.

I think the other thing is that Joe is one of the most exciting fighters to come out of Britain, not in Naz's league, but exhitlerating to watch - speed and fury. I personally like his showboating and his propensity to get into a proper frenzied scrap when he gets tagged. Proper fighting! Mind you, have to admire his adaptability, jab, movement, combos, ability to fight inside and out... He's got the lot.

As for Lennox Lewis..couldnt stand him, boring fighter, who looked like he was bored himself! Joe is leagues above lennox in terms of skill and entertainment.
Based on his two biggest tests going to points? Lewis was entertaining. Have you seen some of Joe's Staries type fights? His pre-Lacy reign was dull as ditchwater aside from when he got the two Yank old-timers over.

Lewis is up there with Wilde. He is far ahead of Joe.

Then again don't you have Enzo Mac at #2 behind Joe :TU:
Not a fan of Maccas. Disinterested in him, though seems like a decent bloke. for me, Joe is head and shoulders above Lewis in so many aspects. Just my opinion, but Lewis bored me to death, in fact the HW division has done for years and years.
Grilling Machine
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3152
Joined: 16 Sep 2005, 02:28

Post by Grilling Machine »

Autobarn mentions Dean Francis, who (and admittedly I am a fan) could've been *the* SM star for a time. Dean had a fierce presence back then, a real air of menace coming to the ring. Yet his boxing was as classy as I'd witnessed since McCallum was in his prime.

Francis vs. Calzaghe in '97 had Fight of the Year written all over it.

In my mind, Calzaghe's best win was over Mark Delaney. It was clearly one-sided, but showed JC's true colours; a brooding, bullying man of tough intensity and dazzling skill. This fight was the equivalent of Ali vs. Williams.

Joe Calzaghe's golden era should've been the late-'90s. It wasn't.
Post Reply