Amir Khan - Lets Look After Him!!!
Even three-belt world champion Nate Campbell isn't the biggest of blokes (moved up from super feather), isn't the youngest (he's 36). You'd have to say statistically Nate Campbell fits the bill.
But right now, is there a fighter out there for Amir that is a) definitely winnable, b) marketable, c) can't punch - as Khan awaits the title shot. You have to rule out Romanov (puncher), Peterson (young & very strong) etc.
I have no problems Khan being ahead of Anthony Peterson. Aside from was it Oscar Leon or Humberto Toldeo (it was a Humberto Soto victim) Anthony hasn't really fought anyone.
Khan did beat Limond, Earl and St Clair.
But right now, is there a fighter out there for Amir that is a) definitely winnable, b) marketable, c) can't punch - as Khan awaits the title shot. You have to rule out Romanov (puncher), Peterson (young & very strong) etc.
I have no problems Khan being ahead of Anthony Peterson. Aside from was it Oscar Leon or Humberto Toldeo (it was a Humberto Soto victim) Anthony hasn't really fought anyone.
Khan did beat Limond, Earl and St Clair.
Gainer has killed off any chance of big opportunities through his negative performance vs JM Marquez. No one would want to bring him in, unless the promoter wanted to save money, from withholding his purse because he wouldn't compete.BigGar wrote:Can't see them pitching Gainer against Khan. A well known but over the hill man could be next but not Gainer.
Am sure Gainer could win a London Marathon though.
-
Southpaw Stylist
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1484
- Joined: 19 Jul 2003, 04:50
"Keep your hands up Nate, keep them up...oh"Asterix wrote:"I beat Peden who beat Campbell...twice." :PAutobarn wrote:LOL, "I beat Peden who beat Campbell."coneye wrote:Out of Retirement Robbie Pedan
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zq9Xs8BeRuQ
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45233
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Have to say, Khan looked fragile against the Dane. He was tagged by right hands repeatedly, and when he was going for the stoppage, was standing flat footed with his chin in the air, totally unprotected, with both hands flailing away.
He got away with it because he was in against an opponent he can overwhelm, but hurting a world class fighter is not enough, you've got to bury them, and if he tries that method, he will be the one getting buried.
I'd give chance a chance against Casamayor or Campbell right now, mainly based on his speed, youth, and punching ability coming forward, but if he didn't win early, he would be dismantled.
He got away with it because he was in against an opponent he can overwhelm, but hurting a world class fighter is not enough, you've got to bury them, and if he tries that method, he will be the one getting buried.
I'd give chance a chance against Casamayor or Campbell right now, mainly based on his speed, youth, and punching ability coming forward, but if he didn't win early, he would be dismantled.
Similar, but Jones Jr's was worse because his punches were later and harder.banjo wrote:When Khan hit Kristjansen when he was down, wasn't RJJ disqualified for exactly the same thing back in 97?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tDHvUbux3xs
ThanksAsterix wrote:Similar, but Jones Jr's was worse because his punches were later and harder.banjo wrote:When Khan hit Kristjansen when he was down, wasn't RJJ disqualified for exactly the same thing back in 97?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tDHvUbux3xs
You should see the rematch. Jones blitzed him in a minute. I watched the first fight a month ago and couldn't believe that Merchant et al were undecided whether he was a force at 175 at the time.banjo wrote:ThanksAsterix wrote:Similar, but Jones Jr's was worse because his punches were later and harder.banjo wrote:When Khan hit Kristjansen when he was down, wasn't RJJ disqualified for exactly the same thing back in 97?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tDHvUbux3xs
I have the rematch on DVD but i'd never seen the first fight.Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:You should see the rematch. Jones blitzed him in a minute. I watched the first fight a month ago and couldn't believe that Merchant et al were undecided whether he was a force at 175 at the time.banjo wrote:ThanksAsterix wrote: Similar, but Jones Jr's was worse because his punches were later and harder.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tDHvUbux3xs
might be that Khan needs a better opponent if he is to look really sharp. I can remember how sloppy David Haye used to look until he fought a world class opponent, Gurov.jamesmcdonnell wrote:Have to say, Khan looked fragile against the Dane. He was tagged by right hands repeatedly, and when he was going for the stoppage, was standing flat footed with his chin in the air, totally unprotected, with both hands flailing away.
He got away with it because he was in against an opponent he can overwhelm, but hurting a world class fighter is not enough, you've got to bury them, and if he tries that method, he will be the one getting buried.
I'd give chance a chance against Casamayor or Campbell right now, mainly based on his speed, youth, and punching ability coming forward, but if he didn't win early, he would be dismantled.
-
Coffee Aroma
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 96
- Joined: 18 Jul 2007, 11:34
Ant Evans wrote:Personally, I am very bored with Khan getting in there with Frodo Baggin's stunt doubles, midgets from super-featherweight, and other hapless no-hopers.
Spud, you say "look after" Khan, but other than booking him in virtual fixed fights ("fixed" in the match-making where the opponent may well try to win but has zero chance of actually doing so) in his hometown, with a referee who allows Khan to do a virtual ground and pound job with no point deduction and a timekeeper who allows the round to end only after Khan gets the KO, how else can Khan be looked after?
What else do you want to be in Amir's favour? The opponent has his shoe-laces tied together?