Corrales vs Castillo I: The fight of the decade?

Post Reply
elmersalsa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15685
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50

Corrales vs Castillo I: The fight of the decade?

Post by elmersalsa »

Is this the greatest fight of this decade?

What is your opinions?
Jaybee From The Castle
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Post by Jaybee From The Castle »

I think Morales-Barrera 1 pips it to the post.
I Feel Fine
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2097
Joined: 10 Apr 2007, 16:48

Post by I Feel Fine »

Jaybee From The Castle wrote:I think Morales-Barrera 1 pips it to the post.
Not sure what "pips it to the post" means. But, if you're saying Morales-Barrera is the better fight, then I agree. :TU:
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

Morales-Barrera I gets the nod for me. Fock me, has it been a good decade though, not over yet. I suppose in truth, any given ten years has it's share of doozies.

Barrera, Morales, Corrales, Pacquiao, Vargas, De La Hoya, Quartey, Trinidad, Mosley, Mayweather, Cotto, Tszyu, Jones, Hatton, Lewis, Castillo, the Marquez brothers, Vazquez...& these are just the top-rung fellas who've given so much, & only a few, at that. Be nice to see some kind of montage when this decade is over, or perhaps a DVD put together that chronicles some of the classic battles over the course of an hour or so, 2000-2009. I'd buy that 8)
Diamond WEAPON
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1729
Joined: 19 Nov 2006, 01:32

Post by Diamond WEAPON »

I'd say it's between Corrales-Castillo I, Morales-Barrera I, and Vazquez-Marquez III. All three were absolutely brutal wars with tons of drama and shifting tides. They were epic like poetry.
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

Diamond WEAPON wrote:I'd say it's between Corrales-Castillo I, Morales-Barrera I, and Vazquez-Marquez III. All three were absolutely brutal wars with tons of drama and shifting tides. They were epic like poetry.
I received Vazquez-Marquez III in the mail this week, but haven't watched it, yet...don't spoil the ending for me! :wink:
elmersalsa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15685
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50

Post by elmersalsa »

Goodnight, Irene wrote:Morales-Barrera I gets the nod for me. Fock me, has it been a good decade though, not over yet. I suppose in truth, any given ten years has it's share of doozies.

Barrera, Morales, Corrales, Pacquiao, Vargas, De La Hoya, Quartey, Trinidad, Mosley, Mayweather, Cotto, Tszyu, Jones, Hatton, Lewis, Castillo, the Marquez brothers, Vazquez...& these are just the top-rung fellas who've given so much, & only a few, at that. Be nice to see some kind of montage when this decade is over, or perhaps a DVD put together that chronicles some of the classic battles over the course of an hour or so, 2000-2009. I'd buy that 8)
This is the WORST DECADE IN BOXING HISTORY....I just hope that the next decade will be better.
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

Oscar De La Hoya got knocked out in this decade, Elmer...what more could you ask for?

This was a great decade. In the context of every ten years since boxing began, it may well be nothing special. However, there have still been many, many, many great bouts from 2000-2008.
I Feel Fine
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2097
Joined: 10 Apr 2007, 16:48

Post by I Feel Fine »

elmersalsa wrote:This is the WORST DECADE IN BOXING HISTORY....I just hope that the next decade will be better.
Honestly, I don't know that you're wrong. That's not to say that there weren't great fights and great fighters in this decade, but in terms of quality I think earlier decades, in general, had better of both. Mayweather wouldn't be P4P king ten years ago, much less twenty years ago.
dempseyfire
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5534
Joined: 29 Oct 2003, 22:56

Post by dempseyfire »

Look, boxing overall is a declining sport. One simply has to recognize that (if you compare the number of great fights of 2000-2008 to 1980-88 or 1990-98 it's really no contest)

BUT, I think we should at least try to see the rainbow through the clouds. The smaller weight classes, particularly the flyweights up to welterweight, have proven to still consistently provide great matchups and timeless fights.
elmersalsa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15685
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50

Post by elmersalsa »

Goodnight, Irene wrote:Oscar De La Hoya got knocked out in this decade, Elmer...what more could you ask for?

This was a great decade. In the context of every ten years since boxing began, it may well be nothing special. However, there have still been many, many, many great bouts from 2000-2008.
Goodnight, Irene, look how Oscar got KO'd. That was not even a knockout. There are a lot of great bouts, yes, BUT THE MAIN FIGHTS, THE SUPER FIGHTS of this decade, STUNK.
El Raincoat
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 790
Joined: 01 Jul 2005, 06:02

Post by El Raincoat »

Diamond WEAPON wrote:I'd say it's between Corrales-Castillo I, Morales-Barrera I, and Vazquez-Marquez III. All three were absolutely brutal wars with tons of drama and shifting tides. They were epic like poetry.
Add Gatti-Ward to that list.

"This is the WORST DECADE IN BOXING HISTORY....I just hope that the next decade will be better"

Hard guy to please the fights above in my opinion were great in any decade.
elmersalsa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15685
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50

Post by elmersalsa »

El Raincoat wrote:
Diamond WEAPON wrote:I'd say it's between Corrales-Castillo I, Morales-Barrera I, and Vazquez-Marquez III. All three were absolutely brutal wars with tons of drama and shifting tides. They were epic like poetry.
Add Gatti-Ward to that list.

"This is the WORST DECADE IN BOXING HISTORY....I just hope that the next decade will be better"

Hard guy to please the fights above in my opinion were great in any decade.
MAYBE you have not seen greater fights :o :o :o ....THIS IS THE WORST DECADE IN BOXING HISTORY...PERIOD.
Awesom-O
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 50
Joined: 16 Nov 2006, 12:24

Post by Awesom-O »

1. corrales-castillo 1
2. barrera-morales 1
3. sithwhateverhisnameis-monispour
Knucklez
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 387
Joined: 16 Oct 2006, 14:26

Post by Knucklez »

I don't rate Castillo-Corrales 1 as a 'great' fight because the two fighters involved are so average. Barrera-Morales 1 was better fight because they are both so much better than Corrales or Castillo.

Castillo-Corrales was certainly action packed, but it reminds me of seeing a punch up in the street more than a top class boxing exhibition.
JDGAFFLIN
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 40
Joined: 31 Jan 2002, 20:00

Post by JDGAFFLIN »

There are a lot of grate scraps that don't get the attention they deserve..

Toney-Jirov. Amazing.
Dorin-Balbi. Terrific.
Castillo-Corrales was incredible.
Barrera-Morales 1. Breath taking.


I have to go with Toney Jirov.
Awesom-O
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 50
Joined: 16 Nov 2006, 12:24

Post by Awesom-O »

Knucklez wrote:I don't rate Castillo-Corrales 1 as a 'great' fight because the two fighters involved are so average. Barrera-Morales 1 was better fight because they are both so much better than Corrales or Castillo.

Castillo-Corrales was certainly action packed, but it reminds me of seeing a punch up in the street more than a top class boxing exhibition.
Corrales and Castillo were very good fighters, top lightweights, and their battle exhibited a high skill level.

A fight like Foreman-Lyle shows more of a "punch-up in the street" than Corrales-Castillo.

Corrales-Castiilo exhibited top-notch in fighting skills from both guys.
elmersalsa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15685
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50

Post by elmersalsa »

Awesom-O wrote:
Knucklez wrote:I don't rate Castillo-Corrales 1 as a 'great' fight because the two fighters involved are so average. Barrera-Morales 1 was better fight because they are both so much better than Corrales or Castillo.

Castillo-Corrales was certainly action packed, but it reminds me of seeing a punch up in the street more than a top class boxing exhibition.
Corrales and Castillo were very good fighters, top lightweights, and their battle exhibited a high skill level.

A fight like Foreman-Lyle shows more of a "punch-up in the street" than Corrales-Castillo.

Corrales-Castiilo exhibited top-notch in fighting skills from both guys.
One of the most solid infighting skills not seen in years. It is a shame that taht art of infighiting is not there anymore.
prettygoldenboy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15
Joined: 03 May 2008, 14:23

Post by prettygoldenboy »

corrales castillo was like a 2 street fighters OMG

DONT KNOW WHAT STREET U LIVE NEAR

are you forgetting that castillo is the guy that everyone thinks beat mayweather in there first fight
mcriss
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 17
Joined: 30 May 2006, 18:34

Post by mcriss »

castillo-corrales I does it for me,that was a 10 round instructional on infighting for any young fighter,and the most amazing ending that i'll never forget...rest in peace chico.
therock1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6
Joined: 12 May 2008, 06:03

Post by therock1 »

Gatti v Ward fight of the decade, at least. All their fights showed how much heart the two fighters have
Post Reply