Corrales vs Castillo I: The fight of the decade?
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15685
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
Corrales vs Castillo I: The fight of the decade?
Is this the greatest fight of this decade?
What is your opinions?
What is your opinions?
-
I Feel Fine
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2097
- Joined: 10 Apr 2007, 16:48
-
Goodnight, Irene
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9463
- Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43
Morales-Barrera I gets the nod for me. Fock me, has it been a good decade though, not over yet. I suppose in truth, any given ten years has it's share of doozies.
Barrera, Morales, Corrales, Pacquiao, Vargas, De La Hoya, Quartey, Trinidad, Mosley, Mayweather, Cotto, Tszyu, Jones, Hatton, Lewis, Castillo, the Marquez brothers, Vazquez...& these are just the top-rung fellas who've given so much, & only a few, at that. Be nice to see some kind of montage when this decade is over, or perhaps a DVD put together that chronicles some of the classic battles over the course of an hour or so, 2000-2009. I'd buy that 8)
Barrera, Morales, Corrales, Pacquiao, Vargas, De La Hoya, Quartey, Trinidad, Mosley, Mayweather, Cotto, Tszyu, Jones, Hatton, Lewis, Castillo, the Marquez brothers, Vazquez...& these are just the top-rung fellas who've given so much, & only a few, at that. Be nice to see some kind of montage when this decade is over, or perhaps a DVD put together that chronicles some of the classic battles over the course of an hour or so, 2000-2009. I'd buy that 8)
-
Diamond WEAPON
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1729
- Joined: 19 Nov 2006, 01:32
-
Goodnight, Irene
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9463
- Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43
I received Vazquez-Marquez III in the mail this week, but haven't watched it, yet...don't spoil the ending for me!Diamond WEAPON wrote:I'd say it's between Corrales-Castillo I, Morales-Barrera I, and Vazquez-Marquez III. All three were absolutely brutal wars with tons of drama and shifting tides. They were epic like poetry.
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15685
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
This is the WORST DECADE IN BOXING HISTORY....I just hope that the next decade will be better.Goodnight, Irene wrote:Morales-Barrera I gets the nod for me. Fock me, has it been a good decade though, not over yet. I suppose in truth, any given ten years has it's share of doozies.
Barrera, Morales, Corrales, Pacquiao, Vargas, De La Hoya, Quartey, Trinidad, Mosley, Mayweather, Cotto, Tszyu, Jones, Hatton, Lewis, Castillo, the Marquez brothers, Vazquez...& these are just the top-rung fellas who've given so much, & only a few, at that. Be nice to see some kind of montage when this decade is over, or perhaps a DVD put together that chronicles some of the classic battles over the course of an hour or so, 2000-2009. I'd buy that 8)
-
Goodnight, Irene
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9463
- Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43
-
I Feel Fine
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2097
- Joined: 10 Apr 2007, 16:48
Honestly, I don't know that you're wrong. That's not to say that there weren't great fights and great fighters in this decade, but in terms of quality I think earlier decades, in general, had better of both. Mayweather wouldn't be P4P king ten years ago, much less twenty years ago.elmersalsa wrote:This is the WORST DECADE IN BOXING HISTORY....I just hope that the next decade will be better.
-
dempseyfire
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5534
- Joined: 29 Oct 2003, 22:56
Look, boxing overall is a declining sport. One simply has to recognize that (if you compare the number of great fights of 2000-2008 to 1980-88 or 1990-98 it's really no contest)
BUT, I think we should at least try to see the rainbow through the clouds. The smaller weight classes, particularly the flyweights up to welterweight, have proven to still consistently provide great matchups and timeless fights.
BUT, I think we should at least try to see the rainbow through the clouds. The smaller weight classes, particularly the flyweights up to welterweight, have proven to still consistently provide great matchups and timeless fights.
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15685
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
Goodnight, Irene, look how Oscar got KO'd. That was not even a knockout. There are a lot of great bouts, yes, BUT THE MAIN FIGHTS, THE SUPER FIGHTS of this decade, STUNK.Goodnight, Irene wrote:Oscar De La Hoya got knocked out in this decade, Elmer...what more could you ask for?
This was a great decade. In the context of every ten years since boxing began, it may well be nothing special. However, there have still been many, many, many great bouts from 2000-2008.
-
El Raincoat
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 790
- Joined: 01 Jul 2005, 06:02
Add Gatti-Ward to that list.Diamond WEAPON wrote:I'd say it's between Corrales-Castillo I, Morales-Barrera I, and Vazquez-Marquez III. All three were absolutely brutal wars with tons of drama and shifting tides. They were epic like poetry.
"This is the WORST DECADE IN BOXING HISTORY....I just hope that the next decade will be better"
Hard guy to please the fights above in my opinion were great in any decade.
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15685
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
MAYBE you have not seen greater fightsEl Raincoat wrote:Add Gatti-Ward to that list.Diamond WEAPON wrote:I'd say it's between Corrales-Castillo I, Morales-Barrera I, and Vazquez-Marquez III. All three were absolutely brutal wars with tons of drama and shifting tides. They were epic like poetry.
"This is the WORST DECADE IN BOXING HISTORY....I just hope that the next decade will be better"
Hard guy to please the fights above in my opinion were great in any decade.
I don't rate Castillo-Corrales 1 as a 'great' fight because the two fighters involved are so average. Barrera-Morales 1 was better fight because they are both so much better than Corrales or Castillo.
Castillo-Corrales was certainly action packed, but it reminds me of seeing a punch up in the street more than a top class boxing exhibition.
Castillo-Corrales was certainly action packed, but it reminds me of seeing a punch up in the street more than a top class boxing exhibition.
Corrales and Castillo were very good fighters, top lightweights, and their battle exhibited a high skill level.Knucklez wrote:I don't rate Castillo-Corrales 1 as a 'great' fight because the two fighters involved are so average. Barrera-Morales 1 was better fight because they are both so much better than Corrales or Castillo.
Castillo-Corrales was certainly action packed, but it reminds me of seeing a punch up in the street more than a top class boxing exhibition.
A fight like Foreman-Lyle shows more of a "punch-up in the street" than Corrales-Castillo.
Corrales-Castiilo exhibited top-notch in fighting skills from both guys.
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15685
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
One of the most solid infighting skills not seen in years. It is a shame that taht art of infighiting is not there anymore.Awesom-O wrote:Corrales and Castillo were very good fighters, top lightweights, and their battle exhibited a high skill level.Knucklez wrote:I don't rate Castillo-Corrales 1 as a 'great' fight because the two fighters involved are so average. Barrera-Morales 1 was better fight because they are both so much better than Corrales or Castillo.
Castillo-Corrales was certainly action packed, but it reminds me of seeing a punch up in the street more than a top class boxing exhibition.
A fight like Foreman-Lyle shows more of a "punch-up in the street" than Corrales-Castillo.
Corrales-Castiilo exhibited top-notch in fighting skills from both guys.
-
prettygoldenboy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15
- Joined: 03 May 2008, 14:23