Louis-Conn I scorecards

Collins2000 · Post by **Collins2000** » 26 Apr 2008, 21:07

granberry wrote:collins is enabled by boxrec's so-called 'moderator,' buzz.

I have tried PMing all the mods about these two but they keep ignoring me.

I know I am a stupid piece of shite but I'm a stupid piece of shite with feelings.

A useless maggot like collins would have been kicked off any other internet site long ago.I know all about being banned from boxing web sites.

Tell us more about how YOU were kicked off here under your previous name of terap.

Racial abuse was the reason wasn't it?

How long did you last at CBZ? They say you got the boot after 1 week for the same reason.

granberry · Post by **granberry** » 26 Apr 2008, 23:00

collins, the poisonous feminine snake of boxrec,

has NEVER made a post on the topic of boxing.

collins is enabled by boxrec's so-called 'moderator,' buzz.

A useless maggot like collins would have been kicked off any other internet site long ago.

Robinson · Post by **Robinson** » 26 Apr 2008, 23:55

If the two had a rematch say 3 months afterwards, how do you think the fight would have played out?

elmersalsa · Post by **elmersalsa** » 27 Apr 2008, 16:21

Goodnight, Irene wrote:
elmersalsa wrote:I had it 7 rounds to 3 and 2 even in favor of Conn.

By the 10-point scring system, I had Conn winning 117-113. It was a great fight. No doubt.
You have it in it's entirety!? Where is the complete fight available?

The fight was broadscast on ESPNCLASSIC some 7 years ago. I got the fight on tape. They show every round of the fight, but some rounds they do not show it for the whole 3 minutes. And yes, Conn was clearly winning the fight according to that broadscast.

Robinson · Post by **Robinson** » 27 Apr 2008, 19:19

So you would say you would have scored it nearly every round for Conn ?

elmersalsa · Post by **elmersalsa** » 30 Apr 2008, 12:50

Robinson wrote:So you would say you would have scored it nearly every round for Conn ?

NO, the fight was competitive, but Conn was outboxing Louis, no doubt. Conn was so fast that Louis was worried. You could see it on film.

p4p1 · Post by **p4p1** » 01 May 2008, 01:35

elmersalsa wrote:
Goodnight, Irene wrote:
elmersalsa wrote:I had it 7 rounds to 3 and 2 even in favor of Conn.

By the 10-point scring system, I had Conn winning 117-113. It was a great fight. No doubt.
You have it in it's entirety!? Where is the complete fight available?
The fight was broadscast on ESPNCLASSIC some 7 years ago. I got the fight on tape. They show every round of the fight, but some rounds they do not show it for the whole 3 minutes. And yes, Conn was clearly winning the fight according to that broadscast.

dont ya hate when they cut the rounds short! it devalues the fight

elmersalsa · Post by **elmersalsa** » 01 May 2008, 14:59

p4p1 wrote:
elmersalsa wrote:
Goodnight, Irene wrote: You have it in it's entirety!? Where is the complete fight available?
The fight was broadscast on ESPNCLASSIC some 7 years ago. I got the fight on tape. They show every round of the fight, but some rounds they do not show it for the whole 3 minutes. And yes, Conn was clearly winning the fight according to that broadscast.
dont ya hate when they cut the rounds short! it devalues the fight

Yeah, it devalues the fight in a way, but the fight had lots of action and one could clearly see who was winning. Conn was winning BIG TIME.

dempseyfire · Post by **dempseyfire** » 01 May 2008, 15:36

I've seen the fight in full. I remember having Conn up by around two rounds at the time of the stoppage, definitely not up by 4-5 rounds as is being implied here. Close fight, Conn pulled ahead clearly in the 11th and 12th rounds.