What would you rather?

[Marlin]

Would you rather have an undefeated Australian Minimumweight fighter unify the division and be recognised as the true world champion or an Australian Heavyweight fighter stake a claim as a genuine top ten guy but lose to the top guy and doesn't win a Title?

[Marlin]

I think this could be interesting...

[toppity]

I can't help it. I like a good heavyweight. That doesn't mean that just because he would be in the top ten he would be any good at the minute...but I just like the one punch power.

Kali over Williamson springs to mind.

Minimum weight, while interesting technically and good for sheer speed, doesn't generate my interest as much.

Go the big fellas.

[Bentley23]

id have to go top ten heavyweight only because the general australian public would take more notice and thats gotta be a good the for australian boxing

[Goodnight, Irene]

Surprised at the results, myself. No doubt, I'd take the champion over the contender. Neither is a particularly strong division in today's game, but, c'mon, do the Heavyweights (who are truly wretched, at the moment) mean that much to us?

I'd certainly take the MW champ.

[Marlin]

Well after an early lead to the Heavyweight contender the Minimumweight champion has made a big comeback (even if there is only one poster who actually stated that he would prefer the little guy)...

[Bentley23]

considering vic got no coverage being super fly champ i think a minimumweight champ would get next to nothing so whats the point really saying that i love to see australian world champs even if it is mw but can u imagian someone like soly being in the top 10 fighting for titles it would be pretty big news