Calzaghe vacates WBC
-
hitman_hatton1
- Heavyweight
- Posts: 6148
- Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 20:57
-
oliverfennell
- Heavyweight
- Posts: 5564
- Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37
-
Max Molyneux
- Heavyweight
- Posts: 7084
- Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:53
yet...but its only a matter of time, I reckon he's gonna hold on to the WBC until the very last minute before he's stripped of it just to p*ss Froch off.Max Molyneux wrote:http://www.allegedly.tv/drill/News/Ar ... tions.html
Calzaghe definitely hasn't vacated the belt.
FFS anyone know how long he can sit on his WBC 168 belt without defending it? Frank will no doubt get him to hang onto it tooth and nail as to inconvenience Mick and Our Frochy, like a spiteful little school kid.Max Molyneux wrote:http://www.allegedly.tv/drill/News/Ar ... tions.html
Calzaghe definitely hasn't vacated the belt.
I'd love to see Froch and JC square-off in the same way as I'd love to see Hatton and Witter fight, but the case for getting Calzaghe to fight Froch fight is nowhere near as strong the Hatton debacle. Stage of careers, how long the fight's been a viable option, the weight they're currently competing at etc.
Options for Carl
1) Kessler should be the person who Froch and Mick target next IMO, they should be doing everything possible to make that fight they might even be able to get the fight for the interim title if it's possible, especially considering Micks relationship with the WBC. Would/should travelling to Denmark be a problem?
2) Look at getting a voluntary shot at Mundine or Butes titles, both of which he'd no doubt have to travel for
3) another option is to sit on the ranking and wait for JC to fcuk off or fight him (which I unfortunately can't see happening) and Carls quite rightly eager to move on with his career and contest for World titles (wank option)
Hopefully Mick can trade on his good relationship with the WBC (he's probably in their ears as I write this) and speed up the process of stripping JC of a belt he's not going to defend.
KESSLER, KESSLER, KESSLER!!!
-
Max Molyneux
- Heavyweight
- Posts: 7084
- Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:53
-
DavidPayne
- Heavyweight
- Posts: 6248
- Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00
I agree up to a point. But I actually think its in three stages.Terry D wrote:Neither is Witter but people cried for it. Why are the same people not crying out for Froch?nickd wrote:Froch is not a big fight for HBO. End of story.
Jones it the way for him to go. At this point he needs names on his record, no matter how faded.
If Joe retires undefeated Hopkins and Jones on his ledger will give fuel to the odd idiot who will no doubt try to argue for him as the greatest fighter ever, or British fighter certainly.
I think it is going to be hard for him when retired. Muhammed Ali, Joe Louis, Ray Robinson, Marvin Hagler, Ray Leonard, throw in your own names. They are all considered great but what do they have in common? People can pull apart their records to prove they are not greater than other fighters.
If a record with names such as Moore, Liston, Patterson, Frazier, Norton and Foreman can be pulled to pieces then Joe's record will get marmalised post-boxing. That's why he needs Jones, to help him with his 'too little too late' strategy.
First you're built up as the greatest thing on earth - notice Calzaghe presently, then post retirement - as your former opponents get swiped and a new young buck appears - you're ridiculed as a pampered champion. The over time, and the time varies from fighter to fighter, you become part of the old-school who would have easily dispatched the now fading young buck.
Look at Bruno - Revered, mocked and now proposed as someone who would clean up the division.
http://boxingwriter.co.uk/2007/11/15/th ... g-romance/
you know, IMO, a Prime Bruno would easily clean up the HW Division nowDavidPayne wrote:I agree up to a point. But I actually think its in three stages.Terry D wrote:Neither is Witter but people cried for it. Why are the same people not crying out for Froch?nickd wrote:Froch is not a big fight for HBO. End of story.
Jones it the way for him to go. At this point he needs names on his record, no matter how faded.
If Joe retires undefeated Hopkins and Jones on his ledger will give fuel to the odd idiot who will no doubt try to argue for him as the greatest fighter ever, or British fighter certainly.
I think it is going to be hard for him when retired. Muhammed Ali, Joe Louis, Ray Robinson, Marvin Hagler, Ray Leonard, throw in your own names. They are all considered great but what do they have in common? People can pull apart their records to prove they are not greater than other fighters.
If a record with names such as Moore, Liston, Patterson, Frazier, Norton and Foreman can be pulled to pieces then Joe's record will get marmalised post-boxing. That's why he needs Jones, to help him with his 'too little too late' strategy.
First you're built up as the greatest thing on earth - notice Calzaghe presently, then post retirement - as your former opponents get swiped and a new young buck appears - you're ridiculed as a pampered champion. The over time, and the time varies from fighter to fighter, you become part of the old-school who would have easily dispatched the now fading young buck.
Look at Bruno - Revered, mocked and now proposed as someone who would clean up the division.
http://boxingwriter.co.uk/2007/11/15/th ... g-romance/