FROCH GETS ANOTHER NEW OPPONENT

Mrbigshot · Post by **Mrbigshot** » 08 May 2008, 16:42

I might have to head to the bookies tomorrow and see what the odds for a bomb scare are.

Autobarn · Post by **Autobarn** » 08 May 2008, 18:00

The person who's behind it is a little parasite that can't do anything contructive itself.

chinny · Post by **chinny** » 09 May 2008, 03:47

Disappointing. I'm driving up from London tomorrow with the missus and the hotel in Nottingham is costing me a fortune.

Anyone know the revised running order? Want to see the Witter, Froch, Murray and Amar fights at least.

Chambers2 · Post by **Chambers2** » 09 May 2008, 04:49

Autobarn wrote:The person who's behind it is a little parasite that can't do anything contructive itself.

Pity he doesn't concentrate on his own undercards as much

Max Molyneux · Post by **Max Molyneux** » 09 May 2008, 05:42

Chambers2 wrote:
Autobarn wrote:The person who's behind it is a little parasite that can't do anything contructive itself.
Pity he doesn't concentrate on his own undercards as much

Do you guys believe someone Is really upto somthing or Is this all out of frustration.

Ted · Post by **Ted** » 09 May 2008, 06:00

Why not throw in Brian Magee, at least it would be an entertaining fight.

Chambers2 · Post by **Chambers2** » 09 May 2008, 06:08

Max Molyneux wrote:
Chambers2 wrote:
Autobarn wrote:The person who's behind it is a little parasite that can't do anything contructive itself.
Pity he doesn't concentrate on his own undercards as much
Do you guys believe someone Is really upto somthing or Is this all out of frustration.

We know that Warren has been trying to sign Carl Froch for a good while, but Froch has repeatedly told him to Fcuk Off. Is allegedly trying to unsettle Carl and disrupt Micks relationship with ITV by promising Inkin (and his German bredrins) vacated WBO belts and whatever else?? I wouldn't put it past him and Gomez's post insinuates that he thinks that somat underhand has gone on

Autobarn · Post by **Autobarn** » 09 May 2008, 06:35

Inkin v Cleverly for the vacant WBO?

leforge · Post by **leforge** » 09 May 2008, 06:45

Surely not, is cleverly even ranked?

Autobarn · Post by **Autobarn** » 09 May 2008, 06:46

Would be funny if he got ranked all of a sudden.

leforge · Post by **leforge** » 09 May 2008, 06:52

I noticed that Nicky Cook, Mitchell and Arthur all in top ten of super featherweight wbo divison. Whats the betting that Guzman moves up then these three plus Harrison could fight each other, keep it in house

TerribleTerry · Post by **TerribleTerry** » 09 May 2008, 06:59

leforge wrote:I noticed that Nicky Cook, Mitchell and Arthur all in top ten of super featherweight wbo divison. Whats the betting that Guzman moves up then these three plus Harrison could fight each other, keep it in house

nothing would please SN more.

Why fight the best in the world when u can have an internal, 3 way tournie and sell it to the public as the best fighting the best?

its a seedy business.

leforge · Post by **leforge** » 09 May 2008, 07:00

Add Stephen Foster, Derry Matthews into the equation

Chambers2 · Post by **Chambers2** » 09 May 2008, 10:19

leforge wrote:I noticed that Nicky Cook, Mitchell and Arthur all in top ten of super featherweight wbo divison. Whats the betting that Guzman moves up then these three plus Harrison could fight each other, keep it in house

Guzman should have a weekend over here and beat all 5 (inc Matthews and Foster)

DG. · Post by **DG.** » 09 May 2008, 11:29

Fwank paid him off.... allegedly!

Most likely gave him a backhander.

Max Molyneux · Post by **Max Molyneux** » 09 May 2008, 11:34

Chambers2 wrote:
Max Molyneux wrote:
Chambers2 wrote: Pity he doesn't concentrate on his own undercards as much
Do you guys believe someone Is really upto somthing or Is this all out of frustration.
We know that Warren has been trying to sign Carl Froch for a good while, but Froch has repeatedly told him to Fcuk Off. Is allegedly trying to unsettle Carl and disrupt Micks relationship with ITV by promising Inkin (and his German bredrins) vacated WBO belts and whatever else?? I wouldn't put it past him and Gomez's post insinuates that he thinks that somat underhand has gone on

He won the purse bids for Adamu but why would he want to sign him? He won the bid for Woods Vs Johnson 3 too and didn't want to sign Clinton, he just hoped they Impressed enough to be a Calzaghe victim.

Gomez will say anything pro Froch and anything negative against anyone anti Froch, he's nothing more than a yes man.

Calzaghe will obviously vacate them belts eventually anyway since he will be retiring next year.

Autobarn · Post by **Autobarn** » 09 May 2008, 11:40

Max Molyneux wrote:
Chambers2 wrote:
Max Molyneux wrote: Do you guys believe someone Is really upto somthing or Is this all out of frustration.
We know that Warren has been trying to sign Carl Froch for a good while, but Froch has repeatedly told him to Fcuk Off. Is allegedly trying to unsettle Carl and disrupt Micks relationship with ITV by promising Inkin (and his German bredrins) vacated WBO belts and whatever else?? I wouldn't put it past him and Gomez's post insinuates that he thinks that somat underhand has gone on
He won the purse bids for Adamu but why would he want to sign him? He won the bid for Woods Vs Johnson 3 too and didn't want to sign Clinton, he just hoped they Impressed enough to be a Calzaghe victim.

Gomez will say anything pro Froch and anything negative against anyone anti Froch, he's nothing more than a yes man.

Calzaghe will obviously vacate them belts eventually anyway since he will be retiring next year.

he's actually well infomed - your accusation could easily be thrown back against yourself re Warren.

Warren surely needs someone to pass Joe's titles on to. Froch would've been ideal. Face it, the man fought to stage a Carl Froch fight. Why, if not to win him over? Was it due to interest in Adamo, no way. He was as interested in the African as he was in M'Baye during the Hatton feud, IMO.

boxingchat · Post by **boxingchat** » 09 May 2008, 12:28

Autobarn wrote:
josh fg wrote:http://www.boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?hu ... &cat=boxer

Incase anyone is interested.. don't know if this is true but if so appeas that Hennesy has had awful luck with his first ITV date one starts to wonder if the face of a certain rival promoter is somewhere in the background trying to ruin Mick's big day!! am I a bit of a conspirecy theorist!
I can play dot-to-dot and believe some sort of Warren-Universum-WBO tomfoolery. But I can't really find the link with Rubin Williams, at all.

You really do have a vivid imagination and your comment is seriously libellous.

Chambers2 · Post by **Chambers2** » 09 May 2008, 12:33

Max Molyneux wrote:
Chambers2 wrote:
Max Molyneux wrote: Do you guys believe someone Is really upto somthing or Is this all out of frustration.
We know that Warren has been trying to sign Carl Froch for a good while, but Froch has repeatedly told him to Fcuk Off. Is allegedly trying to unsettle Carl and disrupt Micks relationship with ITV by promising Inkin (and his German bredrins) vacated WBO belts and whatever else?? I wouldn't put it past him and Gomez's post insinuates that he thinks that somat underhand has gone on
He won the purse bids for Adamu but why would he want to sign him? He won the bid for Woods Vs Johnson 3 too and didn't want to sign Clinton, he just hoped they Impressed enough to be a Calzaghe victim.

Gomez will say anything pro Froch and anything negative against anyone anti Froch, he's nothing more than a yes man.

Calzaghe will obviously vacate them belts eventually anyway since he will be retiring next year.

Why Wouldn't Warren want to sign Carl? he's a fantastic talent a future World Champion and Calzaghe's on his way out

Both Gomez and Boxingchat have said that Froch and Warren have had talks in the past about a move, but Froch has turned him down

WildWaylon · Post by **WildWaylon** » 09 May 2008, 13:58

boxingchat wrote:
Autobarn wrote:
josh fg wrote:http://www.boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?hu ... &cat=boxer

Incase anyone is interested.. don't know if this is true but if so appeas that Hennesy has had awful luck with his first ITV date one starts to wonder if the face of a certain rival promoter is somewhere in the background trying to ruin Mick's big day!! am I a bit of a conspirecy theorist!
I can play dot-to-dot and believe some sort of Warren-Universum-WBO tomfoolery. But I can't really find the link with Rubin Williams, at all.
You really do have a vivid imagination and your comment is seriously libellous.

Yes its dangerous speculation.

rhino222 · Post by **rhino222** » 09 May 2008, 14:13

boxingchat wrote:
Autobarn wrote:
josh fg wrote:http://www.boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?hu ... &cat=boxer

Incase anyone is interested.. don't know if this is true but if so appeas that Hennesy has had awful luck with his first ITV date one starts to wonder if the face of a certain rival promoter is somewhere in the background trying to ruin Mick's big day!! am I a bit of a conspirecy theorist!
I can play dot-to-dot and believe some sort of Warren-Universum-WBO tomfoolery. But I can't really find the link with Rubin Williams, at all.
You really do have a vivid imagination and your comment is seriously libellous.

complete bollocks, the post does not mention anyone in particular, there are thousands of promoters all over the world..why are you paranoid ??

WildWaylon · Post by **WildWaylon** » 09 May 2008, 14:27

rhino222 wrote:
boxingchat wrote:
Autobarn wrote:I can play dot-to-dot and believe some sort of Warren-Universum-WBO tomfoolery. But I can't really find the link with Rubin Williams, at all.
You really do have a vivid imagination and your comment is seriously libellous.
complete bollocks, the post does not mention anyone in particular, there are thousands of promoters all over the world..why are you paranoid ??

True, there are many many promoters worldwide but not many are called Warren and that is the name mentioned.

twenty six · Post by **twenty six** » 09 May 2008, 14:59

Rhino,
The post quotes Warren's name, FFS !
I truly believe that the majority of posters around here would blame Wazza for anything.
You are all paranoid.
Makes not an ounce of difference to Wazza if Meaty Mick puts on a good bill or otherwise.
Wazza showed Witter the door.
He tried to sign Froch and failed.
That's business but Jesus not enough to become Kennedy's assassin.

Maelstrom · Post by **Maelstrom** » 09 May 2008, 15:27

Autobarn wrote:
Max Molyneux wrote:
Chambers2 wrote: We know that Warren has been trying to sign Carl Froch for a good while, but Froch has repeatedly told him to Fcuk Off. Is allegedly trying to unsettle Carl and disrupt Micks relationship with ITV by promising Inkin (and his German bredrins) vacated WBO belts and whatever else?? I wouldn't put it past him and Gomez's post insinuates that he thinks that somat underhand has gone on
He won the purse bids for Adamu but why would he want to sign him? He won the bid for Woods Vs Johnson 3 too and didn't want to sign Clinton, he just hoped they Impressed enough to be a Calzaghe victim.

Gomez will say anything pro Froch and anything negative against anyone anti Froch, he's nothing more than a yes man.

Calzaghe will obviously vacate them belts eventually anyway since he will be retiring next year.
he's actually well infomed - your accusation could easily be thrown back against yourself re Warren.

Warren surely needs someone to pass Joe's titles on to. Froch would've been ideal. Face it, the man fought to stage a Carl Froch fight. Why, if not to win him over? Was it due to interest in Adamo, no way. He was as interested in the African as he was in M'Baye during the Hatton feud, IMO.

Autobarn... as erudite and reasoned as you are, not even you can claim Gomez is impartial.

Everything he posts should be prefaced with a bias warning.

Autobarn · Post by **Autobarn** » 09 May 2008, 16:28

boxingchat wrote:
Autobarn wrote:
josh fg wrote:http://www.boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?hu ... &cat=boxer

Incase anyone is interested.. don't know if this is true but if so appeas that Hennesy has had awful luck with his first ITV date one starts to wonder if the face of a certain rival promoter is somewhere in the background trying to ruin Mick's big day!! am I a bit of a conspirecy theorist!
I can play dot-to-dot and believe some sort of Warren-Universum-WBO tomfoolery. But I can't really find the link with Rubin Williams, at all.
You really do have a vivid imagination and your comment is seriously libellous.

Yeah, playing dot to dot is a deadly game.

Egging on josh fg's self confessed conspiracy theory is even worst.

If Inkin fights for a belt suddenly vacated by Calzaghe, how can anyone help wondering about you know what? (on the other hand, if he doesn't, the theory doesn't have a leg to stand on). I didn't start the notion on here, I've only responded to an idea more than 1 person has come to. No one can prove it, no one can disprove it, and we get bullies like you coming on to tell ppl they're not allowed to speculate. I'm sorry man, but you just cannot tell ppl what they can or cannot think, whether you have a massive organisation behind you or not.

Anyway, we can't really believe all that about SN (my little disclaimer). I bet you all were looking forward to the fight - exactly what boxing needs, competitive fights, no?