ali over rated

Raff The Frenchman
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 497
Joined: 10 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: ali over rated

Post by Raff The Frenchman »

BERNARD BRIGGS. wrote:Ali in my opinion was vastly over rated and would have trouble winning a WBO title today. Reasons being
too small
no defence
fought too many stiffs
rudimentry skills where lacking
Bernard Briggs?...let me see...Hasn't Shannon Briggs recently declared he was the greatest HW of all time?...
are you a relative? :roll:
granberry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3742
Joined: 13 Jul 2006, 11:30

Post by granberry »

Steve Lott is a flaming Ali shill.

I talked to him on the phone when he was newly working for Bill Cayton and Cayton wasn't around.

Lott rattled off every Religion of Ali talking point with the rapidity of a machine gun.

I NEVER talked to a more more flaming, unashamed Ali shill.
raylawpc
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4871
Joined: 21 Mar 2008, 17:21

Post by raylawpc »

Robinson wrote:Shall do.

You know the term Troll for forums...where it come from ?

Harold Johnson and Jimmy Young are african americans however...
According to Wikipedia: "An Internet troll, or simply troll in Internet slang, is someone who posts controversial and usually irrelevant or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum or chat room, with the intention of baiting other users into an emotional response or to generally disrupt normal on-topic discussion."

More from Wikipedia:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_(Internet)
granberry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3742
Joined: 13 Jul 2006, 11:30

Post by granberry »

One of the Ali salesman talking points Steve Lott offered me was that Ali was "just a kid" when he fought Doug Jones.

He poured out the Religion of Ali talking points thick and fast.

Apparently Cayton was getting decripit and hired Lott to answer his phone.

It was a surprise for me to run into a glib modern media type there after years of talking to Jimmy Jacobs and Cayton.

I wonder if Lott had any part in Cayton's disastrous decision to sell/give his and Jimmy Jacobs' fight film collection to ESPN.

Jacobs spent decades finding and recopying/transferring those films to better, more modern and less fragile and less vulnerable film.
Now they sit unused at ESPN.

Jacobs would be ill, as would Cayton, if they could see what a mistake it was to let EPSN have those films.
Robinson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4415
Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 22:34

Post by Robinson »

That is sad if ESPN does not show those fights. I know they have ESPN classic, but surely they could show more variety than the bouts that they do show.

Anyone know how much ESPN paid for the collection?
raylawpc
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4871
Joined: 21 Mar 2008, 17:21

Post by raylawpc »

According to Jacobs' obit in the NYTimes, he owned more than 17,000 films at the time of his death with his partner, Bill Cayton.

Keep in mind that many of these are silent films of lousy quality. Like any network, ESPN is in it for the ratings. Except for diehard boxing fans, how many general viewers would watch - oh, let's say Abe Attell v. Johnny Kilbane in silent format? (I don't know if they even filmed Attell-Kilbane - just using it as an example of two boxing names now largely forgotten by the typical sports fan.)

But I do wish they would show a greater variety. I'm a little tired of watching Rocky KO Archie over and over on ESPN. I did enjoy watching Robinson-Rocky Castellani and Davey-Graziano recently. So maybe there is hope . . .

BTW, Cayton sold the collection to Walt Disney Company (which owns ESPN) in 1998. The terms of the sale were not disclosed.
bjermaine
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 495
Joined: 12 Aug 2007, 23:32

Post by bjermaine »

raylawpc wrote:According to Jacobs' obit in the NYTimes, he owned more than 17,000 films at the time of his death with his partner, Bill Cayton.

Keep in mind that many of these are silent films of lousy quality. Like any network, ESPN is in it for the ratings. Except for diehard boxing fans, how many general viewers would watch - oh, let's say Abe Attell v. Johnny Kilbane in silent format? (I don't know if they even filmed Attell-Kilbane - just using it as an example of two boxing names now largely forgotten by the typical sports fan.)

But I do wish they would show a greater variety. I'm a little tired of watching Rocky KO Archie over and over on ESPN. I did enjoy watching Robinson-Rocky Castellani and Davey-Graziano recently. So maybe there is hope . . .

BTW, Cayton sold the collection to Walt Disney Company (which owns ESPN) in 1998. The terms of the sale were not disclosed.
i'm with you on this one. when espn purchased the library i was hoping to see a lot more variety with what was shown. i mean i love tyson-douglas but i've seen the fight a 100 times in the past year.
Knucklez
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 387
Joined: 16 Oct 2006, 14:26

Post by Knucklez »

re the Cooper/Clay delay.

I've read Steve Lott's report before and others like it which say there was no more than a couple of seconds' delay.

On the flip side of that, I've seen interviews with Henry Cooper where he says that the fight had to be stopped so that someone could fetch another glove from the locker room, which at Wembley is '150 yards away', according to Cooper himself.

It seems odd that he would concoct a story that was so different from what seems to be the actual facts.
raylawpc
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4871
Joined: 21 Mar 2008, 17:21

Post by raylawpc »

Knucklez wrote:re the Cooper/Clay delay.

I've read Steve Lott's report before and others like it which say there was no more than a couple of seconds' delay.

On the flip side of that, I've seen interviews with Henry Cooper where he says that the fight had to be stopped so that someone could fetch another glove from the locker room, which at Wembley is '150 yards away', according to Cooper himself.

It seems odd that he would concoct a story that was so different from what seems to be the actual facts.
Well then, Cooper's story must be the truth. After all, no fighter in history has ever lied or embellished the facts to explain why he lost . . . :roll: :roll: :wink: :wink:

Britisher Bob Mee explains the whole incident as follows: "In the interval [between the fourth and fifth rounds], which was extended slightly by the discovery of a tear in Clay's glove, Clay's corner applied smelling salts to help bring him around. By the time the delayed round five started, with a board official having run off to the dressing room to find a replacement pair of gloves and a plan to fit them after the round had ended, Clay had recovered." Bob Mee, The Heavyweights (2006), p. 70 (emphasis mine). Of course, since Clay stopped Cooper in the fifth, the new gloves weren't needed.

I am not saying the extra 8 seconds reported by Steve Lott didn't help Clay. (I can think of times when I could have used an extra 8 seconds with a fighter between rounds.) But the idea of a substantial delay is just an urban legend.
Last edited by raylawpc on 17 May 2008, 18:46, edited 2 times in total.
BoxBuzz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 29847
Joined: 07 Jun 2005, 16:37

Post by BoxBuzz »

In these cases for my money, facts are the only things that matter.
Passionate opinions that run counter to the empirical evidence are just window dressing for the lost boys.

If someone can produce proof that the Ali Cooper fight was stopped in order to have a new glove manufactured and delivered to the ring...then I'm with you. Otherwise claims of this sort are no different than the people who claim that area 51 harbors alien life forms.
raylawpc
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4871
Joined: 21 Mar 2008, 17:21

Post by raylawpc »

bjermaine wrote:
raylawpc wrote:According to Jacobs' obit in the NYTimes, he owned more than 17,000 films at the time of his death with his partner, Bill Cayton.

Keep in mind that many of these are silent films of lousy quality. Like any network, ESPN is in it for the ratings. Except for diehard boxing fans, how many general viewers would watch - oh, let's say Abe Attell v. Johnny Kilbane in silent format? (I don't know if they even filmed Attell-Kilbane - just using it as an example of two boxing names now largely forgotten by the typical sports fan.)

But I do wish they would show a greater variety. I'm a little tired of watching Rocky KO Archie over and over on ESPN. I did enjoy watching Robinson-Rocky Castellani and Davey-Graziano recently. So maybe there is hope . . .

BTW, Cayton sold the collection to Walt Disney Company (which owns ESPN) in 1998. The terms of the sale were not disclosed.
i'm with you on this one. when espn purchased the library i was hoping to see a lot more variety with what was shown. i mean i love tyson-douglas but i've seen the fight a 100 times in the past year.
There's hope!! Last night was Castellani-Fullmer. A great fight!!
BoxBuzz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 29847
Joined: 07 Jun 2005, 16:37

Post by BoxBuzz »

Maybe their getting the message?
BERNARD BRIGGS.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 36
Joined: 02 Mar 2007, 22:17

Re: ali over rated

Post by BERNARD BRIGGS. »

I see James Toney has won a fight at 40 something the over rated Ali couldnt do even when he fought duds like Trevor Berbeck
HomicideHenry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 18722
Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43

Re: ali over rated

Post by HomicideHenry »

Wasnt aware that Fres Oquendo was comparable to Trevor Berbick :confused:
Raff The Frenchman
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 497
Joined: 10 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: ali over rated

Post by Raff The Frenchman »

BERNARD BRIGGS. wrote:I see James Toney has won a fight at 40 something the over rated Ali couldnt do even when he fought duds like Trevor Berbeck
dude just STFU would ya?
observer1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1836
Joined: 27 Nov 2007, 22:30

Re: ali over rated

Post by observer1 »

BERNARD BRIGGS. wrote:I see James Toney has won a fight at 40 something the over rated Ali couldnt do even when he fought duds like Trevor Berbeck
lol. Give it a rest Trolly.

Toney beat a journeyman.

Trevor Berbick was a HW Champ.

BTW. does anyone know if this guy is or anyway linked to the infamous granberry ?
banjo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 26342
Joined: 20 Nov 2007, 03:17

Re: ali over rated

Post by banjo »

what is a "shill?" :confused:
BroughtonRulesRefuge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2764
Joined: 16 Dec 2008, 06:55

Re: ali over rated

Post by BroughtonRulesRefuge »

observer1 wrote: Toney beat a journeyman.
--- Really interesting how you people think fake fights are for real. Probably do WWE role play thing too.

If the boxorgs ruled his day, he'd be given the decision over Berbick and lined up for a title shot against WBA champ Weaver who'd be DQed in the first round, making Ali the 4x champ.

Instead of Floyd Cummings, Smokin Joe brought in for another go at Ali's belt, with controversial result causing the WBA to order an immediate rematch.

It's a new era. Internet trolls and whacko conspiracy theorists have been given credibility by the powers that be in charge of increasing world disorder. Bloggers become news journalists, and big business becoming a ward of the state while guys in dresses blow up everything they can.
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: ali over rated

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

Never, ever count this thread out. LOL.

Banj --- the term, "shill" is a synonym for a lick-spittle.
Cojimar 1945
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 482
Joined: 07 Oct 2003, 15:15

Re: ali over rated

Post by Cojimar 1945 »

The win over Williams is not one of Ali's best wins. In fact, Williams may not have even been ranked in the top 10 when he fought Ali. However, Ali fans overrating some of his less meaningful wins does not detract from Ali's many wins over guys who were top contenders. In terms of accomplishments, Ali rates very highly. Although people seem to overrate the 70s, guys like Foreman, Norton, Patterson and Lyle were top contenders when Ali beat them.
Saurfang
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 53
Joined: 09 Aug 2008, 19:49

Re: ali over rated

Post by Saurfang »

Ali over rated? :shame:
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: ali over rated

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

Saurfang wrote:Ali over rated? :shame:
It's true. Many greats are.
Saurfang
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 53
Joined: 09 Aug 2008, 19:49

Re: ali over rated

Post by Saurfang »

:TU: :DD
BERNARD BRIGGS.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 36
Joined: 02 Mar 2007, 22:17

Re: ali over rated

Post by BERNARD BRIGGS. »

as Ali was over rated finger poker John Hopawarte is most under rated, he may not have the speed that Ali had but his punches are devestaing and would have been a good tryout for Ali
Collins2000
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4175
Joined: 06 May 2002, 06:13

Re: ali over rated

Post by Collins2000 »

BERNARD BRIGGS. wrote:as Ali was over rated finger poker John Hopawarte is most under rated, he may not have the speed that Ali had but his punches are devestaing and would have been a good tryout for Ali
Great post, Bernie.

I think if they fought 3 times, Hoppa would definately win at least 2 of the fights against Ali.

Of course, I am talking about present day Hop-Frog and present day Ali.
Post Reply