Farnell win 3rd round rsf

REAL_DEAL · Post by **REAL_DEAL** » 06 Mar 2004, 16:33

:P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P

Great win for Farnell, had murphy down 3 times

bennie · Post by **bennie** » 06 Mar 2004, 16:35

REAL_DEAL wrote::P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P

Lawrence Murphy can't fight.

REAL_DEAL · Post by **REAL_DEAL** » 06 Mar 2004, 16:58

bennie wrote:
REAL_DEAL wrote::P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P
Lawrence Murphy can't fight.

going to give Farnell any credit?

bennie · Post by **bennie** » 06 Mar 2004, 17:25

REAL_DEAL wrote:
bennie wrote:
REAL_DEAL wrote::P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P
Lawrence Murphy can't fight.
going to give Farnell any credit?

Yes, but where were Murphy's fighter instincts! His chin was in the air, he was running into shots, jumping up from knockdowns, etc. He summed up all that was bad about the WBU.

Southpaw Stylist · Post by **Southpaw Stylist** » 06 Mar 2004, 17:41

It's a total shit organisation.

ArtOfWar · Post by **ArtOfWar** » 06 Mar 2004, 18:15

I predicted Farnell would win, but I thought it would be by late stoppage or UD. I said in another thread Murphy didn't hit that hard, he just caught Elcock with a perfect punch. However I thought he might have been quite tough, and I thought Farnell would have to take him deep into the fight where he hadn't been before.

It's a great win for Farnell, he won't get much respect for beating Murphy, but it will definitely improve his confidence.

stujones · Post by **stujones** » 06 Mar 2004, 18:51

Crickey, Wayne Elcock must be kicking himself - how did he let himself get caught?

I agree with Bennie's assessment of Murphy - lacked real power aswell which is worrying for Elcock.

Farnell faught well, and did nothing wrong - but Murphy can't fight and can't take a shot.

Complete mismatch - not that I am degrading the fight or the matchmaking - Murphy was an enigma and thus was the favourite - he's no longer an enigma.

kevo · Post by **kevo** » 07 Mar 2004, 07:48

And just think, Boxing Monthly had him rated one of the top 5 middleweights in the country!!

stujones · Post by **stujones** » 07 Mar 2004, 07:58

Kevo wrote:And just think, Boxing Monthly had him rated one of the top 5 middleweights in the country!!

Yes, thats really messed up the rankings - Farnell above Murphy, which surely still means above Elcock?!?

kevo · Post by **kevo** » 07 Mar 2004, 08:09

It sets a Farnell- Elcock rematch up nicely. After last night, I wouldn't read too much into that KO loss to Murphy, I reckon he just got caught cold by a decent punch, and Farnell knows all about that.

glittermonkey · Post by **glittermonkey** » 07 Mar 2004, 08:28

It also brings Lockett right in to the equation. Could be a bit of a round robin in the offing.
After watching last nights fight i'd say that Lockett can easily mix it with this company.

steve689 · Post by **steve689** » 07 Mar 2004, 10:59

DAMN!! For a while before the fight i was tipping Farnell to win but on the prediction league i played safe and conformed with the majority for a Murphy points win

I suspected at the time that his win over Elcock was a good punch and nothing more and it turned out to be that way, i have never been a Farnell fan but it comes to something when he is in the ring and the other guy is more limited

Fair play to Arnie. SKY were getting hyped up about Murphy on the night he beat Elcock simpy to save face after they invested money and effort into Wayne in the first place and he got beat. I agree with Glyn Leach that Murphy should never have been in that fight anyway for a so called world title but that is beside the point, he was never a puncher as his record showed us and he proved it last night by failing to make a dent in Farnell. He caught Elcock with a good shot on the temple and that is that IMO but it doesn't bode well for Elcock's punch resitance does it?

Goz · Post by **Goz** » 07 Mar 2004, 11:31

Well done to Farnell. When he was being hyped as a Hatton-like prospect, undefeated future world class e.t.c we could see through it and I hoped for what Takaloo did to him.

However now he has settled into his place, which is a good domestic scrapper I like him for it and wish him the very best.

Last night was eerily like Gomez-Arthur, Scotland better watch if Brodie comes up from Manchester to fight Harrison! They say these things come in threes...

adamiw · Post by **adamiw** » 07 Mar 2004, 11:39

Yeah, never sure about Murphy, if the 1st round KO against Elcock flattered him, and it look like it had. All that fight proved was that he had a bit of power.

You cant be that good if Farnell can do that to ya.

I want to see Farnell go back down to 154 and fight Takaloo, or stay at middle and face Lockett. Either way he will get knocked out! 8)

steve689 · Post by **steve689** » 07 Mar 2004, 11:44

Farnell V Lockett could be a good fight, Farnell is a hearty brawler and i think if he gets in amongst Lockett and negates his punch power then it could get interesting. It is a perfect match to make though for both guys, Lockett is in danger of stagnating if he does not step up and have a good fight soon. If Farnell can inflict some facial damage he could rattle Lockett i mean Gary marks up pretty easily these days, Farnell does not have a very bad chin either so it could give us a good indication of whether Lockett's power has really travelled up to Middleweight.

Jacko11 · Post by **Jacko11** » 07 Mar 2004, 12:37

I think Murphy was awfull, he is a goood boxer but when Farnell put him down and he was in trouble Murphy tried to TRADE with him how silly though i would put that down to inexperiance.
Well done Farnell though i still think he was the same boxer we have seen b4 nothing different.

Priff · Post by **Priff** » 08 Mar 2004, 05:20

Well done Farnell.
For the first time in his career, he has done something to be really proud of. No matter what the skill level, it takes guts to come back, curb your natural instincts slighty and get the result.
His problem is.... how many fights before he gets put in with an opponent who will beat him? I say he has 1 soft fight, then gets Lockett or Elcock, so his time as as "champion" may be very limited indeed.

steve richards · Post by **steve richards** » 08 Mar 2004, 06:08

Kevo wrote:It sets a Farnell- Elcock rematch up nicely. After last night, I wouldn't read too much into that KO loss to Murphy, I reckon he just got caught cold by a decent punch, and Farnell knows all about that.

I don't recon farnell will give elcock a rematch, if farnell goes for locket he'll beat him on cuts, once lockett gets hit he does'nt want to fight, what a wanker murphy looked, elcock did get caught lucky, it would be nice to see elcock give murphy a kickin, then have the winner of locket farnell. fair play to farnell fighting in glasgow aint no fun( i was at the elcock fight when knowone new murphy and they was fuckin mental), farnell done a good job, but murphy was exposed as am shit fighter who caught a someone with a sucker punch, after thet performance i think he will be back on the dinner circuits.

J · Post by J » 08 Mar 2004, 06:49

thought Farnell looked really up for it and totally wanted it more, Ive never understood the antogaonism towards farnell, other than he was being touted as world beater pre takaloo and got exposed for what he is an all action good domestic fighter, But certainly entertained against murphy at the wekend good luck to him.

steve689 · Post by **steve689** » 08 Mar 2004, 11:47

I think that regardless of whether it is for a title or not Elcock should seek a rematch with Murphy to set the record straight, he would probably stop him i would guess. I doubt Murphy is even a big puncher i think he just caught Elcock with a great shot in a great place on the temple and the two combined caused the stoppage. Elcock-Murphy II should happen and Elcock can lay the ghost to rest.

Farnell win 3rd round rsf

Farnell win 3rd round rsf

Re: Farnell win 3rd round rsf

Re: Farnell win 3rd round rsf

Re: Farnell win 3rd round rsf