Anyone do a R4R for us cheapskates
Re: Anyone do a R4R for us cheapskates
nuff respect for Lazcano getting into the 10th! Is it him doing well or ricky badly?
-
Max Molyneux
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 7084
- Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:53
Re: Anyone do a R4R for us cheapskates
Cortez should ref Hatton's fights from now on, the holding Is taking the piss.
Re: Anyone do a R4R for us cheapskates
Straight right is landing a few times for Lazcano. Straight rights and left hooks.
-
Grilling Machine
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3159
- Joined: 16 Sep 2005, 02:28
Re: Anyone do a R4R for us cheapskates
Yeah, Hatton's trying to hurt and hold now.
Re: Anyone do a R4R for us cheapskates
i can imagine FW's view on hatton's performance!!
lol..and Khan will do well against the current top heads..Hmmm!!
lol..and Khan will do well against the current top heads..Hmmm!!
Re: Anyone do a R4R for us cheapskates
The holding is not that bad.Max Molyneux wrote:Cortez should ref Hatton's fights from now on, the holding Is taking the piss.
Re: Anyone do a R4R for us cheapskates
-
Max Molyneux
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 7084
- Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:53
Re: Anyone do a R4R for us cheapskates
It Is, he pressures throws then holds. Instead of defending or countering when Juan throws back he holds him.Horse wrote:The holding is not that bad.Max Molyneux wrote:Cortez should ref Hatton's fights from now on, the holding Is taking the piss.
Juan should of had a KD scored too In the third with the straight right.
Re: Anyone do a R4R for us cheapskates
It was a slip you daft sod. Stop being a prick. You don't like Hatton, we get it.Max Molyneux wrote:It Is, he pressures throws then holds. Instead of defending or countering when Juan throws back he holds him.Horse wrote:The holding is not that bad.Max Molyneux wrote:Cortez should ref Hatton's fights from now on, the holding Is taking the piss.
Juan should of had a KD scored too In the third with the straight right.
-
hitman_hatton1
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 6150
- Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 20:57
Re: Anyone do a R4R for us cheapskates
the 3rd rd was never a knockdown.
couldn't really argue with that from hatton.
would he beat floyd? no.
would he beat cotto? no.
but is he still a class act? yes.
couldn't really argue with that from hatton.
would he beat floyd? no.
would he beat cotto? no.
but is he still a class act? yes.
-
Max Molyneux
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 7084
- Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:53
Re: Anyone do a R4R for us cheapskates
My thoughts are not posted out of being Anti Hatton you retard.Horse wrote: It was a slip you daft sod. Stop being a prick. You don't like Hatton, we get it.
A straight right landed hence It being a knockdown.
Were not all duped on Hatton like you.
-
Bard of Boxrec
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13114
- Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00
Re: Anyone do a R4R for us cheapskates
wtf is up with Adam Smith slurring and sounding wasted?
-
TerribleTerry
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5272
- Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 12:30
Re: Anyone do a R4R for us cheapskates
What were the results of the Facy and Moore fights? Anyone know?
Re: Anyone do a R4R for us cheapskates
One sided beating really. Fair play to Lazcano, very tough and landed a few good counters. Pretty much what we expected though. Ricky held on to his coveted IBO world title though so that was the main thing
Some cheesy lines for the fans as the end...everyones happy!
P.S. Think Facey drew, not sure about Moore.
Some cheesy lines for the fans as the end...everyones happy!
P.S. Think Facey drew, not sure about Moore.
-
hitman_hatton1
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 6150
- Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 20:57
Re: Anyone do a R4R for us cheapskates
must have been that 8th rd that done it.Riddick Blowe wrote:wtf is up with Adam Smith slurring and sounding wasted?
bit hairy for a few seconds weren't it.
Re: Anyone do a R4R for us cheapskates
What were the official scores?
Re: Anyone do a R4R for us cheapskates
There was a 120-108 there, a 120-110 and I think a 118-110.
Re: Anyone do a R4R for us cheapskates
Would you be saying the same sort of things about Calzaghe if he slipped or held?Max Molyneux wrote:My thoughts are not posted out of being Anti Hatton you retard.
It would have been very harsh for the referee to count that as a knockdown. If you liked Ricky Hatton I doubt you would mention it.Max Molyneux wrote:A straight right landed hence It being a knockdown.
What is this supposed to mean? You really are being ridiculous.Max Molyneux wrote:Were not all duped on Hatton like you.
Re: Anyone do a R4R for us cheapskates
if you don't have sky, check the full fight here http://www.justin.tv/eminem15/archive?s ... 1211663367
-
Phenomenal-Nutrition
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5185
- Joined: 10 Feb 2005, 14:53
Re: Anyone do a R4R for us cheapskates
For Max and Horse, I didnt see the fight, but the official ruling for a KD should be a punch that results in a KD, if its a push it isnt a KD, but if its a punch and the fighter is immediately knocked down, then its a KD regardless of whether he was off balance and slipped or not. Thats the official ruling
Re: Anyone do a R4R for us cheapskates
Hatton threw and slipped. Lazcano didnt tag him. Dont know what Max is on about really.Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:For Max and Horse, I didnt see the fight, but the official ruling for a KD should be a punch that results in a KD, if its a push it isnt a KD, but if its a punch and the fighter is immediately knocked down, then its a KD regardless of whether he was off balance and slipped or not. Thats the official ruling
-
DG.
- Heavyweight

Re: Anyone do a R4R for us cheapskates
How is he a class act?hitman_hatton1 wrote:the 3rd rd was never a knockdown.
couldn't really argue with that from hatton.
would he beat floyd? no.
would he beat cotto? no.
but is he still a class act? yes.
No Jab, just run in straight lines and clinch hold when up close. Accept it, the boys done.
-
Phenomenal-Nutrition
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5185
- Joined: 10 Feb 2005, 14:53
Re: Anyone do a R4R for us cheapskates
Just watched it on stream, I think it was just a slip, he wasnt hurt, I had Hatton winning every round, except maybe the 10thMatthewS wrote:Hatton threw and slipped. Lazcano didnt tag him. Dont know what Max is on about really.Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:For Max and Horse, I didnt see the fight, but the official ruling for a KD should be a punch that results in a KD, if its a push it isnt a KD, but if its a punch and the fighter is immediately knocked down, then its a KD regardless of whether he was off balance and slipped or not. Thats the official ruling
-
Max Molyneux
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 7084
- Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:53
Re: Anyone do a R4R for us cheapskates
The straight right looked like It landed but I was watching Versus on a crappy webstream.
-
Max Molyneux
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 7084
- Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:53
Re: Anyone do a R4R for us cheapskates
He's fought that way since Tszyu and If he Isn't allowed to fight within the rules or fights someone who can bully him back, he looks bad or loses.DG. wrote:How is he a class act?hitman_hatton1 wrote:the 3rd rd was never a knockdown.
couldn't really argue with that from hatton.
would he beat floyd? no.
would he beat cotto? no.
but is he still a class act? yes.
No Jab, just run in straight lines and clinch hold when up close. Accept it, the boys done.
He's a class act outside the ring but Inside he's terrible.