Murphy was not himself

Post Reply
REAL_DEAL
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5027
Joined: 09 Jul 2003, 06:42

Murphy was not himself

Post by REAL_DEAL »

MURPHY: I WANT A REMATCH

Lawrence Murphy has begged for a rematch with Anthony Farnell, claiming that he only lost his WBU middleweight world title because of a burst eardrum
bennie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15244
Joined: 15 Nov 2002, 09:53

Re: Murphy was not himself

Post by bennie »

REAL_DEAL wrote:MURPHY: I WANT A REMATCH

Lawrence Murphy has begged for a rematch with Anthony Farnell, claiming that he only lost his WBU middleweight world title because of a burst eardrum
Yeah, burst by a Farnell right hand. It's like a cut eye ending. A fighter can't complain if the cut was opened by a punch.
Somebody teach him how to fight before he asks for a rematch.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27489
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Murphy was not himself

Post by stujones »

bennie wrote:
REAL_DEAL wrote:MURPHY: I WANT A REMATCH

Lawrence Murphy has begged for a rematch with Anthony Farnell, claiming that he only lost his WBU middleweight world title because of a burst eardrum
Yeah, burst by a Farnell right hand. It's like a cut eye ending. A fighter can't complain if the cut was opened by a punch.
Somebody teach him how to fight before he asks for a rematch.
I think a fighter can complain about a cut if it is a fight he is dominating, remember Damaen Kelly vs Keith Knox?

But in this instance it was cause by one of a number of punches landed on the ear drum - he needs to fight first.

You didn't hear McCullough ask for a rematch, when exactly the same thing happend to him.
bennie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15244
Joined: 15 Nov 2002, 09:53

Re: Murphy was not himself

Post by bennie »

stujones wrote:
bennie wrote:
REAL_DEAL wrote:MURPHY: I WANT A REMATCH

Lawrence Murphy has begged for a rematch with Anthony Farnell, claiming that he only lost his WBU middleweight world title because of a burst eardrum
Yeah, burst by a Farnell right hand. It's like a cut eye ending. A fighter can't complain if the cut was opened by a punch.
Somebody teach him how to fight before he asks for a rematch.
I think a fighter can complain about a cut if it is a fight he is dominating, remember Damaen Kelly vs Keith Knox?

But in this instance it was cause by one of a number of punches landed on the ear drum - he needs to fight first.

You didn't hear McCullough ask for a rematch, when exactly the same thing happend to him.
Knox nutted Kelly, Stu!
KOJOE90
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7461
Joined: 12 May 2002, 12:12

Post by KOJOE90 »

I'm afraid it could be a long road back for Mr Murphy, Farnell made him look like a novice, which many may say he is.
kevo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6559
Joined: 30 Apr 2003, 14:30

Post by kevo »

Murphy doesn't deserve a rematch. He got exposed as a one punch wonder.
steve689
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9655
Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50

Post by steve689 »

Kevo wrote:Murphy doesn't deserve a rematch. He got exposed as a one punch wonder.
I agree, back to the club circuit for him. He was only built up by SKY because they were embarrassed there man Elcock got sparked, that's my thinking anyway...it was a lucky punch plain and simple.
neil r
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 881
Joined: 06 Mar 2004, 10:00

Post by neil r »

i like lawrence he seems a nice guy and ive seen him fight a few times. honest pro whose been unlucky with injuries here and there, particularly with his hand.. ok the eardrum bit is a bit dodgy since farnell done it during the fight but id like to see him have another crack at a title. after all he's with uncle frank,who is in turn with sky. between them im sure they conjour up a title or two :wink:

i thought it was a nice touch by farnell to put a letter into the boxing news thanking lawrence for giving him a shot at the title. i know farnell gets a bit of stick in certain places but he seems ok to me.
Post Reply