murphy will regain title

dmcneil · Post by **dmcneil** » 16 Mar 2004, 05:14

lawrence murphy will destroy farnell in a rematch

REAL_DEAL · Post by **REAL_DEAL** » 16 Mar 2004, 05:36

dmcneil wrote:lawrence murphy will destroy farnell in a rematch

thanks for the info

dondada · Post by **dondada** » 16 Mar 2004, 05:59

Based on what? He looked like a total novice and got totally 'mullahed' as Nige Benn would have put it.

J · Post by J » 16 Mar 2004, 06:23

yeah it wasnt a very close fight was it. On what evidence do you base this, as far as everyone can make out Elcock walked on to a peach of a punch whioch looks a bit lucky in retrospect.

bigynzing · Post by **bigynzing** » 16 Mar 2004, 06:52

Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:Based on what? He looked like a total novice and got totally 'mullahed' as Nige Benn would have put it.

..........and i always thought it was spelled mullerd

mickeybeard · Post by **mickeybeard** » 16 Mar 2004, 07:06

bigynzing wrote:
Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:Based on what? He looked like a total novice and got totally 'mullahed' as Nige Benn would have put it.
..........and i always thought it was spelled mullerd

It's slang. You can get away with either, it's not like Mr Collins or Mr Oxford are going to ask you to 'step outside' about it.

I always use mullered, so if you're wrong, you've got company.

And Murphy needs to go back down a few levels and come up slowly, if he's going to come up at all. I can't see anything but Farnell 'mullering' him again in an immediate rematch.

Dynamite Dean Phillips · Post by **Dynamite Dean Phillips** » 16 Mar 2004, 08:08

Murphy got lucky, but his luck has been shortlived. Simple as that.

Those overhand rights he was caught with in the Farnell fight were textbook shots that shouldn't have landed at that rate at that level in professonal boxing.

steve689 · Post by **steve689** » 16 Mar 2004, 09:14

dmcneil wrote:lawrence murphy will destroy farnell in a rematch

And this is only his first post

jamesmcdonnell · Post by **jamesmcdonnell** » 16 Mar 2004, 09:37

I believe the term mullered refers back to that German footballer, Gerhard Muller?

There seems to be no definitive explanation I can find though.

steve689 · Post by **steve689** » 16 Mar 2004, 09:47

Yes your spot on James, it is.

stujones · Post by **stujones** » 16 Mar 2004, 09:56

jamesmcdonnell wrote:I believe the term mullered refers back to that German footballer, Gerhard Muller?

There seems to be no definitive explanation I can find though.

No idea, I think you are correct - is Gerhard Muller the same as Gerd Muller of the 70's?

If yes, then it probably has as some connection with the 1970 world cup quarter final when Muller basically "Mullard" England.

steve richards · Post by **steve richards** » 16 Mar 2004, 10:07

Dynamite Dean Phillips wrote:Murphy got lucky, but his luck has been shortlived. Simple as that.

Those overhand rights he was caught with in the Farnell fight were textbook shots that shouldn't have landed at that rate at that level in professonal boxing.

Spot on Dean, I was there when he ko'd elcock and to be fair he caught elcock on the spot with a lucky punch, elcock will fight murphy next then the winner will fight the winner of farnell vs Lockett. I think Murphy proved he isnt the greatest thing to come out of Scotland

mickeybeard · Post by **mickeybeard** » 16 Mar 2004, 10:16

jamesmcdonnell wrote:I believe the term mullered refers back to that German footballer, Gerhard Muller?

There seems to be no definitive explanation I can find though.

Maybe. Some people think it comes from the whole 80's Mad Mullah thing, so mullahed would mean wrecked in terms of blown-up. Don't suppose it matters one way or the other really. Certainly don't suppose it mattered to the fighters that Benn mullered... Or mullahed.

jamesmcdonnell · Post by **jamesmcdonnell** » 16 Mar 2004, 10:22

Gerd is I think a more colloquial form of Gerhard.....

I said all along that the shot Murphy landed was a lucky shot, if you watch in slow motion, it's part of a pretty ineffectual looking 4 punch combo, which were all arm shots, it was the third shot I think, and you see Murphy throw the final punch, and then a look of surprise that Elcock has gone down. He knew that it wasn't solid enough to provoke that kind of drastic reaction normally.

Those sort of shots aren't planned, had it landed anywhere but the temple it would have been shrugged off.

This is no disrespect to Murphy, but that was a lucky punch, and flattered to deceive. His shortcoming and lack of experience were brutally exposed by Farnell, and I don't see how the outcome could be any different in a rematch.

kevin · Post by **kevin** » 16 Mar 2004, 10:28

Isn't Gerd Muller now an MC in Germany.. Seen him a few times
on Eurosport

Kev
http://www.britishboxing.net

dondada · Post by **dondada** » 16 Mar 2004, 10:43

Ah, the joys of eytmology!

http://phrases.shu.ac.uk/bulletin_board ... s/796.html

I think their 'mulled wine' theory is pushing it a bit!

Another potential derivative - looking totally fucked as in 'Arthur Mullard'! Anyone remember him? I spelled it that way because I think that's the way it appears in Benn's autobiography.

glittermonkey · Post by **glittermonkey** » 16 Mar 2004, 10:48

Kevin wrote:Isn't Gerd Muller now an MC in Germany.. Seen him a few times on Eurosport

I think Gerd works for Bayern Munich in some capacity. Not sure though.

dmcneil · Post by **dmcneil** » 16 Mar 2004, 10:58

the reason for this being was that Farnell burst his eardrum early on

J · Post by J » 16 Mar 2004, 11:01

dmcneil wrote:the reason for this being was that Farnell burst his eardrum early on

Sorry to be sarcastic but how did he do that, practising his trumpet too loudly? NO by punching him in it!
I could understand that theory if he had lost on a decision with the balance issues that go with an injury like that but not over the massacre that occured the other night. Sorry mate but still cant see a different outcome.

Twinkle Toes · Post by **Twinkle Toes** » 16 Mar 2004, 11:10

Why is it the Scottish never take defeat too well.

Be passionate about your countrymen, but ffs please dont be deluded :)

jamesmcdonnell · Post by **jamesmcdonnell** » 16 Mar 2004, 13:11

I am wondering whether we have Murphy himself on this forum.....

KOJOE90 · Post by **KOJOE90** » 16 Mar 2004, 13:22

Murphy seems like a nice guy, but like I've said on another thread it may be a long road back to the top for him, due to his decisive lose to Farnell who with the greatest of respect made Murphy look like a novice.

MightyWarrior · Post by **MightyWarrior** » 16 Mar 2004, 13:24

dmcneil wrote:the reason for this being was that Farnell burst his eardrum early on

He kept landing on his ear, so I'm not surprised it burst.

JimStone · Post by **JimStone** » 16 Mar 2004, 13:25

Some of you wordsmiths are way out with your predictions on where the word "mullered" comes from (German sportsman

).

It is infact a Romany word that means "Dead". Many Cockneys adopted certain Romany words such as: cushty, mullered, chavvy etc etc...

JimStone · Post by **JimStone** » 16 Mar 2004, 13:31

Also the spelling is irrelevant as it is just phonetics, there is no Romany dictionary.

murphy will regain title

murphy will regain title

Re: murphy will regain title

Re: murphy will regain title