Farnell v Takaloo II

Post Reply
Kilburn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6620
Joined: 25 Jul 2002, 07:27

Farnell v Takaloo II

Post by Kilburn »

If Farnell gets back down to light-middle and secures this fight does anyone give him a chance of winning?

Looking at Takaloo's performances of late he'd do bloody well to reproduce the destructive form he showed that night 3 years ago.
bigynzing
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 393
Joined: 25 Dec 2003, 12:40

Post by bigynzing »

Is Tak fighting Alexander next?...if Tak was to fight Farnell...it might just go the distance. although Farnell looked good against linited opposition in Murphy i still reckon he ships right hands for fun...and one thing you dont want to be doing against Takaloo is sucking on that right.

I`m not sure...im very indecisive...no im not.....yes i am...no...no im not.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27489
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Post by stujones »

No, I can't see Tak KO'ing Farnell in one but I think we learned more about Farnell in his struggles with Groenwald and Elcock than we did that night.

I think Tak has the speed and capability to outbox Anthony, Farnell won't be able to walk through him as he did Murphy.
KOJOE90
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7461
Joined: 12 May 2002, 12:12

Re: Farnell v Takaloo II

Post by KOJOE90 »

Kilburn wrote:If Farnell gets back down to light-middle and secures this fight does anyone give him a chance of winning?

Looking at Takaloo's performances of late he'd do bloody well to reproduce the destructive form he showed that night 3 years ago.
Is there still talk of Farnell returning to Light-Middle? I assume he will just box at what weight offers him the best oppertunity to make money.

Anybody know what Farnells intentions are?
Kilburn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6620
Joined: 25 Jul 2002, 07:27

Re: Farnell v Takaloo II

Post by Kilburn »

Billy Graham seemed pretty certain on Ringside that getting the rematch with Takaloo was the number one priority right now.
glittermonkey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2658
Joined: 28 Feb 2004, 18:03

Re: Farnell v Takaloo II

Post by glittermonkey »

Kilburn wrote:Billy Graham seemed pretty certain on Ringside that getting the rematch with Takaloo was the number one priority right now.
Yeah, i've also heard an interview with Farnell saying he want's to fight Tak again.
KOJOE90
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7461
Joined: 12 May 2002, 12:12

Re: Farnell v Takaloo II

Post by KOJOE90 »

glittermonkey wrote:
Kilburn wrote:Billy Graham seemed pretty certain on Ringside that getting the rematch with Takaloo was the number one priority right now.
Yeah, i've also heard an interview with Farnell saying he want's to fight Tak again.
I think the guy has eared a rematch, the fight makes sence for Tak as well after his recent lose, it would be a good earner for both of them to I would imagine.
Southpaw Stylist
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1484
Joined: 19 Jul 2003, 04:50

Re: Farnell v Takaloo II

Post by Southpaw Stylist »

Kilburn wrote:Billy Graham seemed pretty certain on Ringside that getting the rematch with Takaloo was the number one priority right now.
Surely you mean Steve Foster?

Farnell ain't even with Billy Graham anymore.
Kilburn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6620
Joined: 25 Jul 2002, 07:27

Re: Farnell v Takaloo II

Post by Kilburn »

Southpaw Stylist wrote:
Kilburn wrote:Billy Graham seemed pretty certain on Ringside that getting the rematch with Takaloo was the number one priority right now.
Surely you mean Steve Foster?

Farnell ain't even with Billy Graham anymore.
Yep I meant Foster.
steve689
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9655
Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50

Post by steve689 »

Farnell is not with Graham anymore? Must have missed that one. A revitalised Farnell V an out of form Takaloo could have an interesting outcome.
nickd
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7071
Joined: 17 Mar 2004, 13:45

Post by nickd »

I think Farnell is with Oliver Harrison now??

I'd pick Takaloo to beat him again, probably not as fast as last time but I think he'll stop him again.
Post Reply