Hmmm i feel i've been banged around enough by amateurs to be rated above "arm chair pundits" but whatever you say bud.fist wrote: Hmmm you seemed to have missed the other aspects to Khan i.e. his speed, accuracy, desire.... Sums up what a lot of armchair pundits are like on here - just slagging off fighters left right and centre, with no balance. Khan is vulnerable, has a huge amount to learn still, but that does not negate the good attributes he has. He has plenty of talent, has shown great heart when he' been in trouble and is doing all that is asked of him i.e. beating who is in front of him. Even if he doesn't make the world class grade he deserves credit for his achievement thus far, for providing entertainment and giving it a committed go.
Great fight last night - very exciting. Thats what boxing should be about.
You speak in cliches- 'beating who is in front of him'. So what does that actually mean mate? And how does it relate to his chances at world level, which is the point of this whole thread?