JACK DEMPSEY's BACK

Locked
granberry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3742
Joined: 13 Jul 2006, 11:30

JACK DEMPSEY's BACK

Post by granberry »

Image
granberry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3742
Joined: 13 Jul 2006, 11:30

Re: JACK DEMPSEY's BACK

Post by granberry »

BOB FITZSIMMON'S BACK
Image
Robinson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4415
Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 22:34

Re: JACK DEMPSEY's BACK

Post by Robinson »

Tough hard working men.
ebeneezer
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 514
Joined: 23 Sep 2005, 17:01

Re: JACK DEMPSEY's BACK

Post by ebeneezer »

Peter Maher had a great back
Collins2000
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4175
Joined: 06 May 2002, 06:13

Re: JACK DEMPSEY's BACK

Post by Collins2000 »

granberry, as you are an expert on young fellow's backs, please post some others that have taken your fancy over the last 70 years.

:D
granberry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3742
Joined: 13 Jul 2006, 11:30

Re: JACK DEMPSEY's BACK

Post by granberry »

Collins2000 wrote:granberry, as you are an expert on young fellow's backs, please post some others that have taken your fancy over the last 70 years.

:D
collins shows up on cue with his homosexual fixation.

collins wrote repeated homosexual posts on the Peter Maher thread until donnellon, who wrote a book on Maher, stopped posting on boxrec.

Trash boxrec with your homosexual fixation, collins

with the approval of 'moderator' buzz, who will show up shortly,

gleeful that this thread has been trashed.

buzz enables collins and his stooges to trash any boxrec thread started by a poster who does not grovel for their Ali.

ONLY posts and posters who grovel for Ali are allowed on boxrec
by decree of 'moderator' buzz and his homosexually fixated protege, collins.
ebeneezer
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 514
Joined: 23 Sep 2005, 17:01

Re: JACK DEMPSEY's BACK

Post by ebeneezer »

granberry wrote: collins wrote repeated homosexual posts on the Peter Maher thread until donnellon, who wrote a book on Maher, stopped posting on boxrec.
You posted a picture that you claimed was Peter Maher. Donnellon said it was not. You insulted him. He stopped posting here because of it.

Got it?
granberry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3742
Joined: 13 Jul 2006, 11:30

Re: JACK DEMPSEY's BACK

Post by granberry »

ebeneezer wrote:
granberry wrote: collins wrote repeated homosexual posts on the Peter Maher thread until donnellon, who wrote a book on Maher, stopped posting on boxrec.
You posted a picture that you claimed was Peter Maher. Donnellon said it was not. You insulted him. He stopped posting here because of it.

Got it?
ebeneezer LIES when the light is shown on him and his mentor.

collins and his current number one stooge, ebeneezer, trash boxrec

with the approval and aid of their enabler, 'moderator' buzz.

collins trashed the Peter Maher thread with repeated posts expressing his homosexual fixation.

Then his mentor buzz showed up gleefully.

donnellon, who wrote a book on Peter Maher, hasn't posted on boxrec since that thread was trashed by collins and company.

Trash boxrec with your homosexual fixation, collins.
ebeneezer
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 514
Joined: 23 Sep 2005, 17:01

Re: JACK DEMPSEY's BACK

Post by ebeneezer »

granberry wrote:
ebeneezer LIES when the light is shown on him and his mentor.

collins and his current number one stooge, ebeneezer, trash boxrec

with the approval and aid of their enabler, 'moderator' buzz.

collins trashed the Peter Maher thread with repeated posts expressing his homosexual fixation.

Then his mentor buzz showed up gleefully.

donnellon, who wrote a book on Peter Maher, hasn't posted on boxrec since that thread was trashed by collins and company.

Trash boxrec with your homosexual fixation, collins.

Image
Sundance Kid
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 43
Joined: 13 Sep 2006, 08:00

Re: JACK DEMPSEY's BACK

Post by Sundance Kid »

Good grief, why do you guys continue to pay homage to this Granberry character?

I know exactly who he is. Everyone 'in the know' knows who he is.

And if he should march off to another site under another gutless pseudonym, I will still know who he is.

Forget about him - get a life.

Mike Casey
Collins2000
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4175
Joined: 06 May 2002, 06:13

Re: JACK DEMPSEY's BACK

Post by Collins2000 »

Klanberry, I'm sorry. I must have missed the point you are trying to make.

Are you posting impressive backs to prove something other than what I alluded to?

Perhaps you think impressive backs are the #1 criteria for the making of an impressive fighter. If so, how about a snap from your collection featuring Floyd "Jumbo" Cummings, a man whose back was impresive even to a non-back-fetishist like yours truly.
ebeneezer
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 514
Joined: 23 Sep 2005, 17:01

Re: JACK DEMPSEY's BACK

Post by ebeneezer »

Sundance Kid wrote: I know exactly who he is. Everyone 'in the know' knows who he is.

Do tell.
Collins2000
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4175
Joined: 06 May 2002, 06:13

Re: JACK DEMPSEY's BACK

Post by Collins2000 »

Sundance Kid wrote:Good grief, why do you guys continue to pay homage to this Granberry character?

I know exactly who he is. Everyone 'in the know' knows who he is.

And if he should march off to another site under another gutless pseudonym, I will still know who he is.

Forget about him - get a life.

Mike Casey

Mike, if his real identity is so well known, you won't mind enlightening those of us who aren't yet in the know?
BoxBuzz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 29847
Joined: 07 Jun 2005, 16:37

Re: JACK DEMPSEY's BACK

Post by BoxBuzz »

Collins, I'm thinking that this is being said because his "persona" is known in all boxing sights on the internet based on his uniquely distinct behavior. Not that he is someone that people know of personally. I could be wrong and if that is the case it would be interesting to bring that to light.

He's not the overt type IMHO. His whole schtick is to hide behind the keyboard and grumble and take shots at folks from the safety of his lair.
Collins2000
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4175
Joined: 06 May 2002, 06:13

Re: JACK DEMPSEY's BACK

Post by Collins2000 »

BoxBuzz wrote:Collins, I'm thinking that this is being said because his "persona" is known in all boxing sights on the internet based on his uniquely distinct behavior. Not that he is someone that people know of personally. I could be wrong and if that is the case it would be interesting to bring that to light.

He's not the overt type IMHO. His whole schtick is to hide behind the keyboard and grumble and take shots at folks from the safety of his lair.
The way I read Mike Casey's post and the earlier post from Rick Farris in 'the greatest thread ever' is that they both know who he is in real life.

I could be wrong.
Ric
Editor
Editor
Posts: 2962
Joined: 28 Dec 2001, 20:00

Re: JACK DEMPSEY's BACK

Post by Ric »

Because this is no longer about boxers of the past, it is being locked. Please take your grade-schoolyard antics elsewhere.
Locked