BoxBuzz wrote:Decagon.....I wish you well and pray that in the future we are subject to only your civil and rational personalities.
Apparently he's taking his medication again so hopefully we won't have any more meltdowns...
BoxBuzz wrote:Decagon.....I wish you well and pray that in the future we are subject to only your civil and rational personalities.
I love Big George for three big reasons..Robinson wrote:Theoneishere2008,
some people just dont like George...maybe they are not
fans of his grills ??
Excellent list. IMO Griffith would be out of the top 10 but in the top 20. I never liked Whittaker but admired his skill. I might have him below Hagler. I would move up Arguello and Gomez slightly because they were killer punchers and won titles at three weight classes at a time when that was rare, especially at the lower weights. Hate Tyson but he might belong on the list because of his amazing run in the late 1980s. Diddo with Mayweather's and Manny P's run in the 1990s.Ezzard wrote:1) Roberto Duran
2) Muhammed Ali
3) Carlos Monzon
4) Emile Griffith
5) Ray Leonard
6) Pernell Whittaker
7) Marvin Hagler
8) Salvador Sanchez
9) Michael Spinks
10) Thomas Hearns
11) Julio Cesar Chavez
12) Alexis Arguello
13) Wilfredo Gomez
14) Larry Holmes
15) Azumah Nelson
16) Joe Frazier
17) Bob Foster
18) Eusebio Pedroza
19) Jose Napoles
20) Evander Holyfield
I often think that had Sancjez not died wins over Arguello, Nelson II, Pedroza and Chavez were all within his grasp. Of course you can say this for any of them but Sanchez achieved so much in such a short space of time.
Pryor? You aren't allowed to enjoy Pryor, mate!mali wrote:This list is, not who i think are the best ten fighters of the last forty years but,the ten fighters i have most enjoyed watching;
bobby chacon
aaron pryor
cornelius boza edwards
ray mancini
matthew saad muhammad
mike tyson
nigel benn
arturro gatti
eric morales
manny pacquiao
Collins2000 wrote:Pryor? You aren't allowed to enjoy Pryor, mate!mali wrote:This list is, not who i think are the best ten fighters of the last forty years but,the ten fighters i have most enjoyed watching;
bobby chacon
aaron pryor
cornelius boza edwards
ray mancini
matthew saad muhammad
mike tyson
nigel benn
arturro gatti
eric morales
manny pacquiao
Cue to old clown #1 and old clown #2 sniggering and soiling their underwear.
It was a while since I wrote this list but I'll stand by it give or take a boxer or 2...giacomino wrote:Excellent list. IMO Griffith would be out of the top 10 but in the top 20. I never liked Whittaker but admired his skill. I might have him below Hagler. I would move up Arguello and Gomez slightly because they were killer punchers and won titles at three weight classes at a time when that was rare, especially at the lower weights. Hate Tyson but he might belong on the list because of his amazing run in the late 1980s. Diddo with Mayweather's and Manny P's run in the 1990s.Ezzard wrote:1) Roberto Duran
2) Muhammed Ali
3) Carlos Monzon
4) Emile Griffith
5) Ray Leonard
6) Pernell Whittaker
7) Marvin Hagler
8) Salvador Sanchez
9) Michael Spinks
10) Thomas Hearns
11) Julio Cesar Chavez
12) Alexis Arguello
13) Wilfredo Gomez
14) Larry Holmes
15) Azumah Nelson
16) Joe Frazier
17) Bob Foster
18) Eusebio Pedroza
19) Jose Napoles
20) Evander Holyfield
I often think that had Sancjez not died wins over Arguello, Nelson II, Pedroza and Chavez were all within his grasp. Of course you can say this for any of them but Sanchez achieved so much in such a short space of time.
IMO, Duran, Monzon, Griffith don't get the credit they deserve because a lot of people around today didn't see them in their prime. Duran is remembered as a fat welterweight/middleweight who gave up vs. Sugar Ray, got outpointed by Benitez and Hagler and KO'd by Hearns. He was an animal at lightweight. The Duran of the 70s would have beaten any of the above. Monzon was a stud who would have almost certainly beaten any middleweight in history, except maybe Sugar Ray Robinson in his prime
I much prefer what he showed on July 30th 1989. It's not just about sleeping.Elton John wrote:Terry Norris who on Feb 9 1991, showed the imposter what boxing is REALLY about. It's not just about running!
just a babe in the woods at the time developing his mutlidimensional skills which luckily for him showed in time for the big leonard fight! And lets not ever forget how wonderful he was in that Mugabi fight when the supposed puncher actually turned out to be Terry Norris in disguise! How wonderful!!!Jaywheel wrote:I much prefer what he showed on July 30th 1989. It's not just about sleeping.Elton John wrote:Terry Norris who on Feb 9 1991, showed the imposter what boxing is REALLY about. It's not just about running!