Minto's promoter hints at Haye bout

[Max Molyneux]

He's most likely shot too and doesn't back up all the talk Haye's doing too.

[Chambers2]

He's most likely shot too and doesn't back up all the talk Haye's doing too.

How on earth a Calzaghe fan has the cheek to criticise Hayes opponents, whilst BIGGING up JC's opponents is beyond me (Only you could come out with this shit Max)

It's his second fight at the weight and if this is true he's taking on a well-ranked BIG punching dangerous ex-Champ

[HughJohnson]

He's most likely shot too and doesn't back up all the talk Haye's doing too.

He offered WladK out to his face....whats he supposed to do???, give me 3 opponents who are available for Haye to fight better than Maskaev.

[MightyWarrior]

So it might be Maskaev then? That's a very ambitious fight for a heavyweight novice, full credit to Haye for backing up his threats to go in at the deep end.
The Russian might be seen as vunerable, but he was recently good enough to beat top boys like Sam and Rahman, and no shame losing to the hard punching Sam Peters.
He's crafty enough to make things very interesting, and definitely carries the punch to put Haye's lights out, if he puts a foot wrong.
Excellent fight.

[Max Molyneux]

He's most likely shot too and doesn't back up all the talk Haye's doing too.

How on earth a Calzaghe fan has the cheek to criticise Hayes opponents, whilst BIGGING up JC's opponents is beyond me (Only you could come out with this shit Max)

It's his second fight at the weight and if this is true he's taking on a well-ranked BIG punching dangerous ex-Champ

I don't big up JC's opponents you stupid liar, I never disagree when people bring up he has had soft opponents. Read my posts or don't bother you mong.

I am not happy he's fighting Jones Jr either, I wanted him to school Pavlik since he would easily and Pavlik Is overhyped as a tough opponent for him.

At least Calzaghe has proven himself as the best fighter, Pacman got his p4p 1 on shot Mexicans.

Calzaghe fought loads of former champs too and yet most of you called them shot or past it but It's ok when It's someone else and then you have double standards.

Maskaev was decent a few years ago, now he's shot, had alot of injuries, Inactivity and might have a lack of confidence coming off a TKO loss recently. Being In the top 10 WBC rank doesn't mean It's a good opponent, Danny Williams was No 7 before Vitali outclassed him too.

Don't lie and be a hypocrite, you big up Froch's crap alot.

He offered WladK out to his face....whats he supposed to do???, give me 3 opponents who are available for Haye to fight better than Maskaev.

Yeah at a charity event which Klitschko just smiled off and said he needs to get In line which was right since he needs to show he's good enough at HW, he's an excellent cruiser and I want him to win at HW, just hard to take to shit talking and fighting Maskaev won't back up that shit talking.

[Max Molyneux]

So it might be Maskaev then? That's a very ambitious fight for a heavyweight novice, full credit to Haye for backing up his threats to go in at the deep end.
The Russian might be seen as vunerable, but he was recently good enough to beat top boys like Sam and Rahman, and no shame losing to the hard punching Sam Peters.
He's crafty enough to make things very interesting, and definitely carries the punch to put Haye's lights out, if he puts a foot wrong.
Excellent fight.

The Samil Sam win was nearly 3 years ago and the Rahman one was 2 years ago though, look at the big Inactivity he's had due to politics and Injuries. He's chinny too which should be made for Haye.

Sam Peter Isn't very good either, a prime Oleg would of done better.

[Chambers2]

He's most likely shot too and doesn't back up all the talk Haye's doing too.

How on earth a Calzaghe fan has the cheek to criticise Hayes opponents, whilst BIGGING up JC's opponents is beyond me (Only you could come out with this shit Max)

It's his second fight at the weight and if this is true he's taking on a well-ranked BIG punching dangerous ex-Champ

I don't big up JC's opponents you stupid liar, I never disagree when people bring up he has had soft opponents. Read my posts or don't bother you mong.

I am not happy he's fighting Jones Jr either, I wanted him to school Pavlik since he would easily and Pavlik Is overhyped as a tough opponent for him.

At least Calzaghe has proven himself as the best fighter, Pacman got his p4p 1 on shot Mexicans.

Calzaghe fought loads of former champs too and yet most of you called them shot or past it but It's ok when It's someone else and then you have double standards.

The differenece being Calzaghe was a champion at the weight for nigh on a decade and was still fighting people below the calibre of Maskaev (Bika, Salem, Mger, Manfredo, Ashira) this is Hayes SECOND fight at the weight and he's taking on a dangerous puncher!! I've never read you say that you wanted Calzaghe to take the Pavlik fight, you just seem to write that it's a mismatch (it's clearly not) and that JC would school him.

Now you're saying that Pacman is P4P #1 because he's beat up shot Mexicans like Barrera, Morales, Marquez, Larios. I reckon RJJ and Nard are both further over the hill than any of Pacmans oppo's (with the exception of Morales II)...... and you're saying I have double-standards????

You're clearly an idiot Max, so I won't be responding to your drivel any more

[MightyWarrior]

The Samil Sam win was nearly 3 years ago and the Rahman one was 2 years ago though, look at the big Inactivity he's had due to politics and Injuries. He's chinny too which should be made for Haye.

Sam Peter Isn't very good either, a prime Oleg would of done better.

Inactivity isn't a big problem with heavyweights, most of them fight once a year when they hit the top anyway. And 2 years at heavyweight is not a long time ago at all.
He was ko'd by Peters - so what? Peters would be favorite to do the same thing to an unproven HW like Haye as well.

Chinny? And Haye isn't I suppose?

Clearly it's a more than good fight for Haye to take on in his HW debut ( the Polish cab driver doesn't count )