Snipes beat Gerrie Coetzee
No he didn't. That decision was total and utter bullshit.
Snipes beat Gerrie Coetzee
I guess you missed Ali-Terrell. There were two belts in Ali's era, and Ali unified them.Robinson wrote:When Ali left the sport it was the beginning of the ABC gangs,
I mean lets be fair, its easy for us to assume that unifying the
belts is easy for a champion.
The reality is more 'belts' a fighter has, the more sanctioning
fee's he has to pay.
When Ali was champion he had ONE belt, ONE title to worry
about. No politics of the era..
And Holmes failed to meet any of those men, besides Williams who he fought when Williams was 16-0. We all know how that fight went.Robinson wrote:Furthermore ... I feel that the 80's were a very under-rated decade for heavyweights. Dokes , Page , Pinklon Thomas, Carl Williams and Tony Tucker.
I'm going to go out on a limb and say the Norton that Holmes beat was better than the Holyfield that Lewis fought, or anyone that Lewis ever beat for that matter.Big Bad John wrote:The Ruiz fights were close, and Holyfield went on to beat Hasim Rahman. I don't see how the comparison is valid. It wasn't until three years later, against Chris Byrd, that Holyfield lost conclusively. Norton was counting the lights not long after losing - very closely - to Holmes.
And by "many," I assume you mean "1/50 of."
Good post.Ambling Alp wrote:I'm going to go out on a limb and say the Norton that Holmes beat was better than the Holyfield that Lewis fought, or anyone that Lewis ever beat for that matter.Big Bad John wrote:The Ruiz fights were close, and Holyfield went on to beat Hasim Rahman. I don't see how the comparison is valid. It wasn't until three years later, against Chris Byrd, that Holyfield lost conclusively. Norton was counting the lights not long after losing - very closely - to Holmes.
And by "many," I assume you mean "1/50 of."
Yes Norton got crushed by Shavers' after that, but that was in part because he had nothing left after the Holmes fight. Norton had one last fight left in him when he fought Holmes.
I would also argue that it's less embarrassing losing to Shavers by knockout than losing to Ruiz by decision.
Just watch the holmes-Norton fight and either one of the Lewis-Holyfield fights. Holyfield had nothing in the first fight, and only fought in spurts in the 2nd fight. (Though he still should have got the decision.)
Norton was much better in his fight with Holmes than Holyfield was at any time after he fought Tyson.
What is more important is their fights before. Holyfield looked horrible against Vaugh Bean. Norton looked pretty good in a great fight against Jimmy Young.
Everyone looked horrible against Vaugh Bean. Teddy Atlas quit training Michael Moorer. More to the point, look at his three performances before the Bean fight, beating Michael Moorer and Mike Tyson by knockout! And let's be honest, Jimmy Young was really just an even more pussified version of John Ruiz. Or are you arguing that Jimmy Young happened to be in his last good fight as well, given that he never again had a win over a top heavyweight, and went on to lose two straight to Ocasio?Ambling Alp wrote:I'm going to go out on a limb and say the Norton that Holmes beat was better than the Holyfield that Lewis fought, or anyone that Lewis ever beat for that matter.Big Bad John wrote:The Ruiz fights were close, and Holyfield went on to beat Hasim Rahman. I don't see how the comparison is valid. It wasn't until three years later, against Chris Byrd, that Holyfield lost conclusively. Norton was counting the lights not long after losing - very closely - to Holmes.
And by "many," I assume you mean "1/50 of."
Yes Norton got crushed by Shavers' after that, but that was in part because he had nothing left after the Holmes fight. Norton had one last fight left in him when he fought Holmes.
I would also argue that it's less embarrassing losing to Shavers by knockout than losing to Ruiz by decision.
Just watch the holmes-Norton fight and either one of the Lewis-Holyfield fights. Holyfield had nothing in the first fight, and only fought in spurts in the 2nd fight. (Though he still should have got the decision.)
Norton was much better in his fight with Holmes than Holyfield was at any time after he fought Tyson.
What is more important is their fights before. Holyfield looked horrible against Vaugh Bean. Norton looked pretty good in a great fight against Jimmy Young.
Ummm, no biggie here, but , this post ( as just above ) was mine , not Robinsons.I Feel Fine wrote:I guess you missed Ali-Terrell. There were two belts in Ali's era, and Ali unified them.Robinson wrote:When Ali left the sport it was the beginning of the ABC gangs,
I mean lets be fair, its easy for us to assume that unifying the
belts is easy for a champion.
The reality is more 'belts' a fighter has, the more sanctioning
fee's he has to pay.
When Ali was champion he had ONE belt, ONE title to worry
about. No politics of the era..
Most of Holmes' title challengers were of poor quality or inexperienced. Seven guys with less than 17 fights. He should have lost to two of them. And he barely beat Norton to win the title, and Norton was 34. People pick on Tyson's title opponents, with justification, but Holmes' were not much better.
And Holmes failed to meet any of those men, besides Williams who he fought when Williams was 16-0. We all know how that fight went.Robinson wrote:Furthermore ... I feel that the 80's were a very under-rated decade for heavyweights. Dokes , Page , Pinklon Thomas, Carl Williams and Tony Tucker.
Holyfield had his best wouldn't have looked horrible against Vaughn Bean.Big Bad John wrote:Everyone looked horrible against Vaugh Bean. Teddy Atlas quit training Michael Moorer. More to the point, look at his three performances before the Bean fight, beating Michael Moorer and Mike Tyson by knockout! And let's be honest, Jimmy Young was really just an even more pussified version of John Ruiz. Or are you arguing that Jimmy Young happened to be in his last good fight as well, given that he never again had a win over a top heavyweight, and went on to lose two straight to Ocasio?Ambling Alp wrote:I'm going to go out on a limb and say the Norton that Holmes beat was better than the Holyfield that Lewis fought, or anyone that Lewis ever beat for that matter.Big Bad John wrote:The Ruiz fights were close, and Holyfield went on to beat Hasim Rahman. I don't see how the comparison is valid. It wasn't until three years later, against Chris Byrd, that Holyfield lost conclusively. Norton was counting the lights not long after losing - very closely - to Holmes.
And by "many," I assume you mean "1/50 of."
Yes Norton got crushed by Shavers' after that, but that was in part because he had nothing left after the Holmes fight. Norton had one last fight left in him when he fought Holmes.
I would also argue that it's less embarrassing losing to Shavers by knockout than losing to Ruiz by decision.
Just watch the holmes-Norton fight and either one of the Lewis-Holyfield fights. Holyfield had nothing in the first fight, and only fought in spurts in the 2nd fight. (Though he still should have got the decision.)
Norton was much better in his fight with Holmes than Holyfield was at any time after he fought Tyson.
What is more important is their fights before. Holyfield looked horrible against Vaugh Bean. Norton looked pretty good in a great fight against Jimmy Young.