Pacman v DLH in discussions.

Post Reply
boxbet
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 363
Joined: 09 Sep 2005, 11:01

Pacman v DLH in discussions.

Post by boxbet »

Pac said he would go to 140 and no more, Interesting fight, DLH should be too big, but Pac is fast and quite illusive , hummm.
EddieShredder
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Pacman v DLH in discussions.

Post by EddieShredder »

De La Hoya couldn't see 140 if you cut one of his legs off...
boxbet
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 363
Joined: 09 Sep 2005, 11:01

Re: Pacman v DLH in discussions.

Post by boxbet »

Hatton said no to pacman, but yes to feather fist pauli. would pacman fight DLH at 147??
EddieShredder
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Pacman v DLH in discussions.

Post by EddieShredder »

I still think Hatton would fight Pacman @ 140 after he's faught Paulie - a fight which was always going to happen.

I don't think Pacman would think about DLH really.... the size difference is just way too much. I think Arum said just after the Diaz fight, that Pacman will be at 135 for a while now. Then again.... Arum says a lot :lol:
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: Pacman v DLH in discussions.

Post by Autobarn »

ludicrous. bugger off into retirement, Oscar. no one needs this. who afterward, Cristian Mijares, the super flyweight champ? Then Ivan Calderon?

Never liked DLH and his handicapping. His handicapping was always obvious. Now it is beyond obvious. It is a joke.
boxbet
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 363
Joined: 09 Sep 2005, 11:01

Re: Pacman v DLH in discussions.

Post by boxbet »

The money offered to pacman could be huge, this could sway things.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27503
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Pacman v DLH in discussions.

Post by stujones »

Well I am a fan, so naturally bias... but I think some are getting the wrong end... it seems like, the way the press have viewed it - that it is team Pacman that fancies this.... not necessarily DLH saying "let me find a small un I can whack about abit".

Think it could be a good fight actually.... yes Pacman was a Fly originally... but comparing his lightweight debut to the reign of Mayweather - then he looks stronger than Mayweather, if not technically as good... and Mayweather was strong enough to hurt DLH.
boxbet
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 363
Joined: 09 Sep 2005, 11:01

Re: Pacman v DLH in discussions.

Post by boxbet »

I wouldnt put money on this fight. it would be competitive, could be close.
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28480
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Pacman v DLH in discussions.

Post by Coco »

boxbet wrote:The money offered to pacman could be huge, this could sway things.
And the fact he said he won't go higher than 140 is prob just a starting negotiating point. Money always talks in the end
The size difference between Oscar and Pac is massive though
Post Reply