Is Lennox Lewis A Top Ten Heavyweight?

TheOneIsHere2008
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1181
Joined: 01 Jul 2008, 12:09

Is Lennox Lewis A Top Ten Heavyweight?

Post by TheOneIsHere2008 »

And if he fought in the glorious seventies how would he have fared against

Joe Frazier

Ken Norton

Muhammad Ali

George Foreman

Earnie Shavers

Jimmy Young

Larry Holmes
bennie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15244
Joined: 15 Nov 2002, 09:53

Re: Is Lenox Lewis A Top Ten Heavyweight?

Post by bennie »

He would have beaten Young and Shavers. That's it.
yancey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2827
Joined: 16 Dec 2007, 18:26

Re: Is Lenox Lewis A Top Ten Heavyweight?

Post by yancey »

bennie wrote:He would have beaten Young and Shavers. That's it.
and Norton.
jimglen
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 987
Joined: 21 Jan 2004, 04:38

Re: Is Lenox Lewis A Top Ten Heavyweight?

Post by jimglen »

NO he's English, I mean Canadian or is it Weat Indies... I don't know, but to call him a Top 10 or all-time great, Sorry completely wrong Nationality! :lol:
SteveO
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1383
Joined: 31 Dec 2001, 20:00

Re: Is Lenox Lewis A Top Ten Heavyweight?

Post by SteveO »

IMO Ali would outpoint him. He would have beaten Young and Norton. Shavers and Frazier would have had a punchers chance, but I think he would have beaten them too. Foreman and Holmes are harder to judge - would have been great match-ups though.
dempseyfire
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5534
Joined: 29 Oct 2003, 22:56

Re: Is Lenox Lewis A Top Ten Heavyweight?

Post by dempseyfire »

bennie wrote:He would have beaten Young and Shavers. That's it.
I agree.

Norton style-wise would be a bad style-matchup for Lewis. Lennox is not an aggressive puncher like Foreman or Cooney when he faces guys who can punch and box (see his two fights vs a lethargic Holyfield), and Norton would be able to time and outjab the Briton and come on strong late as Lewis faded. Of course a big Lewis uppercut or right cross could end matters but I think Norton wins 2/3.
observer1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1836
Joined: 27 Nov 2007, 22:30

Re: Is Lenox Lewis A Top Ten Heavyweight?

Post by observer1 »

bennie wrote:He would have beaten Young and Shavers. That's it.
Agree.
Ross
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 368
Joined: 22 Jul 2006, 07:36

Re: Is Lenox Lewis A Top Ten Heavyweight?

Post by Ross »

observer1 wrote:
bennie wrote:He would have beaten Young and Shavers. That's it.
Agree.
ANd so do I
Grimm
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2231
Joined: 06 Jan 2005, 22:22

Re: Is Lenox Lewis A Top Ten Heavyweight?

Post by Grimm »

Top 10? Not in most people's or mine but close.

I say he would have a chance with almost everyone on that list but Ali and Holmes give him the toughest matches.
Ross
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 368
Joined: 22 Jul 2006, 07:36

Re: Is Lenox Lewis A Top Ten Heavyweight?

Post by Ross »

Grimm wrote:Top 10? Not in most people's or mine but close.

I say he would have a chance with almost everyone on that list but Ali and Holmes give him the toughest matches.

Lewis would be between 10 and 20 at best,
rob h
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 610
Joined: 15 Dec 2006, 08:36

Re: Is Lenox Lewis A Top Ten Heavyweight?

Post by rob h »

Lennox is def top ten material.

He could beat any of these names on a given night. Didn't George say you would have to be crazy to get in the ring with Lewis?

Lennox was very reckless in his younger days (reminds me of Haye) and most definately a slugger,but a 33year old Lewis is well in my top ten.
oliverfennell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5564
Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37

Re: Is Lenox Lewis A Top Ten Heavyweight?

Post by oliverfennell »

As Lewis only lost to inferior boxers when he was complacent and/or unfit, it would be unfair to say, for example, Frazier would definitely beat him, because Rahman and McCall did. Assuming Lewis was at his best, I think he would get the following results:

Joe Frazier - W PTS

Ken Norton - W KO 6

Muhammad Ali - L PTS

George Foreman - L KO 5 (Foreman too big and persistant to be easily outboxed by Lewis)

Earnie Shavers - W KO 8

Jimmy Young - W PTS

Larry Holmes - L PTS
TheOneIsHere2008
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1181
Joined: 01 Jul 2008, 12:09

Re: Is Lenox Lewis A Top Ten Heavyweight?

Post by TheOneIsHere2008 »

oliverfennell wrote:As Lewis only lost to inferior boxers when he was complacent and/or unfit, it would be unfair to say, for example, Frazier would definitely beat him, because Rahman and McCall did. Assuming Lewis was at his best, I think he would get the following results:

Joe Frazier - W PTS

Ken Norton - W KO 6

Muhammad Ali - L PTS

George Foreman - L KO 5 (Foreman too big and persistant to be easily outboxed by Lewis)

Earnie Shavers - W KO 8

Jimmy Young - W PTS

Larry Holmes - L PTS
Even if Lenox lost to Ali, Holmes, and Foreman he would still possibly be a top ten hw...That's how stacked the division was...
oliverfennell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5564
Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37

Re: Is Lenox Lewis A Top Ten Heavyweight?

Post by oliverfennell »

I agree. Lennox's CV doesn't stack up as well as many of the accepted greats, but I think what was special about Lewis was his strategic ability to overcome any style. When you think about it, he beat them all - sluggers, slick boxers, all-rounders, short men, tall men...
TheOneIsHere2008
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1181
Joined: 01 Jul 2008, 12:09

Re: Is Lenox Lewis A Top Ten Heavyweight?

Post by TheOneIsHere2008 »

oliverfennell wrote:I agree. Lennox's CV doesn't stack up as well as many of the accepted greats, but I think what was special about Lewis was his strategic ability to overcome any style. When you think about it, he beat them all - sluggers, slick boxers, all-rounders, short men, tall men...
Foreman said he was the GOAT...He certainly is the most skilled big man of all time...

I suspect his stature will continue to grow as the stature of the heavyweight division diminishes...
bennie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15244
Joined: 15 Nov 2002, 09:53

Re: Is Lenox Lewis A Top Ten Heavyweight?

Post by bennie »

It's hard for me to match Lewis with all the greats of the 1970s, when he didn't even fight the best in his era. More than that, he waited for Holyfield and Tyson to get old before taking them on - and still fought unconvincingly.
Tyson was literally begging to be knocked out.
Bottom line is, the greats of the 70's never avoided each other; Lewis and Bowe did (and yes, I know they fought as amateurs).
oliverfennell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5564
Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37

Re: Is Lenox Lewis A Top Ten Heavyweight?

Post by oliverfennell »

bennie wrote:It's hard for me to match Lewis with all the greats of the 1970s, when he didn't even fight the best in his era. More than that, he waited for Holyfield and Tyson to get old before taking them on - and still fought unconvincingly.
Tyson was literally begging to be knocked out.
Bottom line is, the greats of the 70's never avoided each other; Lewis and Bowe did (and yes, I know they fought as amateurs).
Bowe was the best of the era? Based on what? Beating ONE top-level opponent?

Besides, he was clearly the one to blame for not fighting Lewis, not the other way around.
bennie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15244
Joined: 15 Nov 2002, 09:53

Re: Is Lenox Lewis A Top Ten Heavyweight?

Post by bennie »

oliverfennell wrote:
bennie wrote:It's hard for me to match Lewis with all the greats of the 1970s, when he didn't even fight the best in his era. More than that, he waited for Holyfield and Tyson to get old before taking them on - and still fought unconvincingly.
Tyson was literally begging to be knocked out.
Bottom line is, the greats of the 70's never avoided each other; Lewis and Bowe did (and yes, I know they fought as amateurs).
Bowe was the best of the era? Based on what? Beating ONE top-level opponent?

Besides, he was clearly the one to blame for not fighting Lewis, not the other way around.
Oh, God! It should have happened. It was a natural. Little Holyfield fought Bowe three times! Where was the Canadian?
oliverfennell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5564
Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37

Re: Is Lenox Lewis A Top Ten Heavyweight?

Post by oliverfennell »

bennie wrote:
oliverfennell wrote:
bennie wrote:It's hard for me to match Lewis with all the greats of the 1970s, when he didn't even fight the best in his era. More than that, he waited for Holyfield and Tyson to get old before taking them on - and still fought unconvincingly.
Tyson was literally begging to be knocked out.
Bottom line is, the greats of the 70's never avoided each other; Lewis and Bowe did (and yes, I know they fought as amateurs).
Bowe was the best of the era? Based on what? Beating ONE top-level opponent?

Besides, he was clearly the one to blame for not fighting Lewis, not the other way around.
Oh, God! It should have happened. It was a natural. Little Holyfield fought Bowe three times! Where was the Canadian?
Ah, I see now. A Lewis hater because the guy had the temerity to leave the UK with his mother when he was 12 years old. He should have stayed if he was true Brit!

Of course the Bowe fight was a natural. Everybody was calling for it, except for one person - Riddick Bowe! This is accepted by pretty much everyone now.
bennie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15244
Joined: 15 Nov 2002, 09:53

Re: Is Lenox Lewis A Top Ten Heavyweight?

Post by bennie »

The sad thing is you actually care.
TheOneIsHere2008
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1181
Joined: 01 Jul 2008, 12:09

Re: Is Lenox Lewis A Top Ten Heavyweight?

Post by TheOneIsHere2008 »

Lenox Lewis is a class act and represents the UK well... I don't understand the animus toward him by some British boxing fans...

And he knocked out Riddick Bowe on his way to Olympic Gold...
boxerbob
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1041
Joined: 30 Oct 2005, 18:11

Re: Is Lenox Lewis A Top Ten Heavyweight?

Post by boxerbob »

anyone who thinks lweis would beat frazier is mad......joe would set a relentless pace that would see lewis tired after 7 rounds , in a 15 round fight joe win by a brutal beating in 10
HomicideHenry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 18722
Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43

Re: Is Lenox Lewis A Top Ten Heavyweight?

Post by HomicideHenry »

Based on all he's accomplished in his career, yes he is. If anything he proved without a shadow of a doubt he was by all accounts the best "big" heavyweight there was. As for hypotheticals, thats even harder to determine...

Lewis for all his size and ability, wasn't ever able to put away an older Holyfield, defeated Tyson too late for it to really matter, and never quite faced anyone who was a truly dangerous threat throughout his career; can you see the Lewis who was stunned by Tyson early on, be able to cope with Joe Frazier's brutal assaults? Can you see Lewis who was stopped cold by Rahman take one of Foreman's roundhouses on the chin, let alone Shavers? I sure as hell can't myself.

I liked RING magazines article once on LEWIS VS THE ALL TIME GREATS, and it pondered the thought of Dempsey and Lewis...for about a second...the opening lines were "TIMBERRRRR!", in favor of Jack Dempsey.
EriqS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 82
Joined: 10 Dec 2005, 18:29

Re: Is Lenox Lewis A Top Ten Heavyweight?

Post by EriqS »

bennie wrote:He would have beaten Young and Shavers. That's it.
I think he'd have a pretty good chance of beating Norton. Actually, I see it as a virtual certainty.
EriqS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 82
Joined: 10 Dec 2005, 18:29

Re: Is Lenox Lewis A Top Ten Heavyweight?

Post by EriqS »

bennie wrote:It's hard for me to match Lewis with all the greats of the 1970s, when he didn't even fight the best in his era. More than that, he waited for Holyfield and Tyson to get old before taking them on - and still fought unconvincingly.
Tyson was literally begging to be knocked out.
Bottom line is, the greats of the 70's never avoided each other; Lewis and Bowe did (and yes, I know they fought as amateurs).
I think it was Bowe who avoided Lewis. Can't blame Lennox for that.
Post Reply