Is Lennox Lewis A Top Ten Heavyweight?

Knucklez
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 387
Joined: 16 Oct 2006, 14:26

Re: Is Lenox Lewis A Top Ten Heavyweight?

Post by Knucklez »

elmersalsa wrote:
Knucklez wrote:
elmersalsa wrote:LEWIS GOT KNOCKED OUT BY TWO BUMS in his prime. Now, he would have beaten Bowe, Tyson, Holyfield and Buster Douglas at their very best?

I cannot see a guy that have one of the weakest chins in boxing history beat skilled and hard hitting fighters like Bowe, Tyson or Holyfield. Buster Douglas in Tokyo that night would have beaten any great heavyweight fighter in history. The problem with Buster was that he was A LAZY FIGHTER WITH GREAT TALENT. HE DID NOT LIKE TO TRAIN. He had all the physical attributes of a great heavyweight: Tall, great jab, great mobility, speed, decent stamina if trained hard, better chin than given credit for, and could outhink his opponent, plus can hit hard.

But if you put Douglas in Tokyo against any version of Lennox Lewis and Buster wins...Probably by KO, too.
The Tyson that demolished the great Michael Spinks and Trevor Berbick would have eaten Lennox for dinner.
The Riddick Bowe that fought magnificently against Holyfield the first time, was exceptional. I cannot see Lennox in his best day beating Bowe that night.

And Holyfield in his prime? Once Holy is all over him, forget it...Lennox cannot take those shots.

Lennox Lewis was a great heavyweight by his accomplishments, but if I judge him by his talent, he was ORDINARY LIKE ANY ONE ELSE. He was nothing to be HIGH about.
Riddick Bowe gets way too much respect on here. His best over performance was basically a shoot out against a guy he outweighed by 30 pounds. If Holyfield had true heavyweight power, it's quite possibly that he would stopped Bowe, as he nearly did at the end of the tenth.

Bowe was outboxed and beaten up twice by C-level fighter Andrew Golota, who Lewis knocked out in a round. Bowe came within a whisker of being knocked out by a version of Evander Holyfield who was suffering from hepatitis B and had no energy or strength, yet you argue that Lennox has no chin.

Buster Dougles put in a sublime performance against an overweight Tyson but did little else in his career to demonstrate that he could beat Lewis.

And the fact that Lennox did not stop Holyfield in the first fight when he had him in trouble is a sign of his cautious tactics, not of his lack of talent.
Buster Douglas in Tokyo was excellent, one of the best performances in boxing history that I have ever seen. We cannot nothing away from him beating the great Mike Tyson.

Lennox Lewis has no chin...Can't you see that? He got KO'd by two bums.

Riddick Bowe was a terrific heavyweight. He was just another lazy guy like Buster Douglas, Hector "Macho" Camacho or Wilfred Benitez that did not like to train. That night with Holyfield, THE FIRST FIGHT, he showed that he had lots of skill. He could fight well in the inside for a big man, could box, can punch and could also take a punch. He took the best shots that Holy threw, and had the performance of his lifetime...Lennox could not take those shots...no way.
Elmer,

Lewis lost to two fighters he should not have, there is no question about that at all. However using the two knockout shots as evidence of his poor chin is misguided. Both the McCall and the Rahman right hands were thrown at full force and landed squarely on Lewis' chin. i.e. both were knock out shots.

While there's no doubt that they were shots that Lewis should not have be open to in the first place, to label Lewis as chinny because of those two shots is a lazy description.

You also use the first Bowe-Holyfield fight as a testament to Bowe's chin, yet most people know that Holyfield was not a big puncher at heavyweight in the slightest. Even the commentators during the fight spoke about it at length, on US and UK TV stations. I'll repeat the point I made earlier: Bowe was knocked down and nearly out by the light-punching, unwell, drained and over the hill Holyfield in their 3rd fight. Please explain how this proves Bowe's chin to be superior to Lewis'. Lewis took full force shots from Tua, VK and Mercer better than Bowe did from Holyfield and Golota.

I'm also not clear how you can place Bowe higher than Lewis, when Bowe's "peak" was about 4 fights long while Lewis was the dominant heavy over a much longer period.
oliverfennell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5564
Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37

Re: Is Lennox Lewis A Top Ten Heavyweight?

Post by oliverfennell »

Bowe's "peak" was about 4 fights long
Your assessment is about three fights too many! Holyfield I was his peak, and THAT'S IT. Dokes and Ferguson don't count.
Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11173
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Re: Is Lennox Lewis A Top Ten Heavyweight?

Post by Ezzard »

Lewis was a great fighter. But he had a couple of weaknesses that will always stand against him.

The two dramatic KO's will always be there.

Then there's the conditioning. Good shape for a big boxer. But all of those advantages came at the cost of stamina. Lennox often got gassed when fighting at a fast pace, especially after he got a bit too muscle bound. Hagler, when he was commentating on Rahman I, basically predicted a KO punch coming because of the way Lewis was panting, mouth open...

Whilst his size will allow some to write of others' chances opponents always have a chance against Lennox.

Even so he deserves a lot of plaudits.
elmersalsa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15706
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50

Re: Is Lenox Lewis A Top Ten Heavyweight?

Post by elmersalsa »

yiddo14 wrote:Buster Douglas being a "great" is bullshit talk from Tyson lovers who try and justify the fact Tyson got outboxed and beat up by a grade B Heavyweight whilst in his prime.

A prime Buster Douglas would not even dominate todays Heavyweight division, let alone beat ANY Heavyweight great in history :-?

You are talking GARBAGE, man....Watch Buster Douglas performance against the great Mike Tyson. It was one of the best performances of the last 30 years. He did EVERYTHING RIGHT in that fight.

He probably won't even dominate today's heavyweights not because of his talent. But it would be because of his LACK OF COMMITMENT AND TRAINING.

But if you put Buster of that night in Tokyo against today's heavyweights, and Buster EASILY WINS. No matter how the Klitshkos or Sam Peter be at their very best.
elmersalsa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15706
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50

Re: Is Lenox Lewis A Top Ten Heavyweight?

Post by elmersalsa »

Grimm wrote:
elmersalsa wrote: Maybe ONLY Earnie Shavers...Against Jimmy Young? It depends how Jimmy comes into the fight. I don't think that Lennox Lewis would have beaten these guys at their very best:
1. Riddick Bowe
2. Evander Holyfield
3. Mike Tyson
4. Buster Douglas
5. Jersey Joe Walcott
6. Ezzard Charles
Are you related to Bert Sugar?
No, I watched all of them on film. Riddick Bowe in that special night with Holyfield I, would have get the revenge but I do not know why he did not wanted to fight Lennox.

Evander Holyfield just got to be on top of him and that would be it.

Mike Tyson's power, especially in the 80s, when he was at his very best, would have killed him

The Buster Douglas in Tokyo would have beaten any heavyweight great in history.

The great Jersey Joe Walcott has too much skill and too much speed for Lewis.

Ezzard Charles in his prime wins by an easy UD. Too fast and slick.
elmersalsa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15706
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50

Re: Is Lenox Lewis A Top Ten Heavyweight?

Post by elmersalsa »

yiddo14 wrote:Incidently, Lewis did NOT lost to two "bums" in my opinion.

Sure, he should never have lost to these two(imagine if he had not...)and it was purely his own fault that he did by not taking either seriously(and the ref in the McCall fight being far too eager to call it off)BUT, how anyone can call McCall and Rahman "bums" is beyond me(especially from someone who brings up their 30 years as a big fight fan)

Oliver McCall was Heavyweight Champion Of The World. He defended once and also managed to have another shot at the title.

Hasim Rahman is a TWO TIME Heavyweight Champion Of The World.
Neither can be called a bum. That, agai is bullshit talk trying to take away form Lewis' achievements.
In their prime, both were competing at world class level..."bums" don't do that.

Lewis' chin was not bad at all, infact it was rather good. Holyfield, Tyson and Bowe visited the canvas on more occasions than Lewis did, and Lewis fought all the big punchers of his era.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4SQmxIP5Bk
Whoever thinks Lewis had a glass chin please watch this video...Herbie Hide had/has a glass chin, Lennox Lewis certainly did not.
In today's time, ANY BUM could be a title holder at any given time.
elmersalsa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15706
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50

Re: Is Lenox Lewis A Top Ten Heavyweight?

Post by elmersalsa »




Elmer,

Lewis lost to two fighters he should not have, there is no question about that at all. However using the two knockout shots as evidence of his poor chin is misguided. Both the McCall and the Rahman right hands were thrown at full force and landed squarely on Lewis' chin. i.e. both were knock out shots.

While there's no doubt that they were shots that Lewis should not have be open to in the first place, to label Lewis as chinny because of those two shots is a lazy description.

You also use the first Bowe-Holyfield fight as a testament to Bowe's chin, yet most people know that Holyfield was not a big puncher at heavyweight in the slightest. Even the commentators during the fight spoke about it at length, on US and UK TV stations. I'll repeat the point I made earlier: Bowe was knocked down and nearly out by the light-punching, unwell, drained and over the hill Holyfield in their 3rd fight. Please explain how this proves Bowe's chin to be superior to Lewis'. Lewis took full force shots from Tua, VK and Mercer better than Bowe did from Holyfield and Golota.

I'm also not clear how you can place Bowe higher than Lewis, when Bowe's "peak" was about 4 fights long while Lewis was the dominant heavy over a much longer period.
Holyfield hit hard enough to put any heavyweight in the floor. He almost put a 250 pound George Foreman in the canvas.

David Tua never hit Lewis..He was far from the fight. He was not agressive enough.
Vitali Klitshko was going to knock him out in matter of time...He was denied.
Ray Mercer never hit him clean. Plus Mercer is awkard and clumsy. He only had a great chin and stamina. That is about it.
oliverfennell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5564
Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37

Re: Is Lenox Lewis A Top Ten Heavyweight?

Post by oliverfennell »

elmersalsa wrote:
yiddo14 wrote:Buster Douglas being a "great" is bullshit talk from Tyson lovers who try and justify the fact Tyson got outboxed and beat up by a grade B Heavyweight whilst in his prime.

A prime Buster Douglas would not even dominate todays Heavyweight division, let alone beat ANY Heavyweight great in history :-?

You are talking GARBAGE, man....Watch Buster Douglas performance against the great Mike Tyson. It was one of the best performances of the last 30 years. He did EVERYTHING RIGHT in that fight.

He probably won't even dominate today's heavyweights not because of his talent. But it would be because of his LACK OF COMMITMENT AND TRAINING.

But if you put Buster of that night in Tokyo against today's heavyweights, and Buster EASILY WINS. No matter how the Klitshkos or Sam Peter be at their very best.
Have to agree with you. He was a one-hit wonder for sure, but FOR ONE NIGHT ONLY, he was PERFECT.
observer1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1836
Joined: 27 Nov 2007, 22:30

Re: Is Lenox Lewis A Top Ten Heavyweight?

Post by observer1 »

oliverfennell wrote:
elmersalsa wrote:
yiddo14 wrote:Buster Douglas being a "great" is bullshit talk from Tyson lovers who try and justify the fact Tyson got outboxed and beat up by a grade B Heavyweight whilst in his prime.

A prime Buster Douglas would not even dominate todays Heavyweight division, let alone beat ANY Heavyweight great in history :-?

You are talking GARBAGE, man....Watch Buster Douglas performance against the great Mike Tyson. It was one of the best performances of the last 30 years. He did EVERYTHING RIGHT in that fight.

He probably won't even dominate today's heavyweights not because of his talent. But it would be because of his LACK OF COMMITMENT AND TRAINING.

But if you put Buster of that night in Tokyo against today's heavyweights, and Buster EASILY WINS. No matter how the Klitshkos or Sam Peter be at their very best.
Have to agree with you. He was a one-hit wonder for sure, but FOR ONE NIGHT ONLY, he was PERFECT.
Indeed.

Fair Rnough Tyson was no where near his best. Had he taken the fight serously and went into the fight like he went into fights few years previously, he would have taken Douglas no matter how good he performed. But that Night, Douglas would have given any of the HW legends a tough night.
Grimm
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2231
Joined: 06 Jan 2005, 22:22

Re: Is Lenox Lewis A Top Ten Heavyweight?

Post by Grimm »

elmersalsa wrote:
Grimm wrote:
elmersalsa wrote: Maybe ONLY Earnie Shavers...Against Jimmy Young? It depends how Jimmy comes into the fight. I don't think that Lennox Lewis would have beaten these guys at their very best:
1. Riddick Bowe
2. Evander Holyfield
3. Mike Tyson
4. Buster Douglas
5. Jersey Joe Walcott
6. Ezzard Charles
Are you related to Bert Sugar?
No, I watched all of them on film. Riddick Bowe in that special night with Holyfield I, would have get the revenge but I do not know why he did not wanted to fight Lennox.

Evander Holyfield just got to be on top of him and that would be it.

Mike Tyson's power, especially in the 80s, when he was at his very best, would have killed him

The Buster Douglas in Tokyo would have beaten any heavyweight great in history.

The great Jersey Joe Walcott has too much skill and too much speed for Lewis.

Ezzard Charles in his prime wins by an easy UD. Too fast and slick.
Holyfield and Tyson?....Maybe.

Douglas was a lucky bum, who did nothing but luckily knock Tyson out.

Walcott was much too small yes he was skilled but he would two step his way into being knocked out.

And I can't see anything that Charles would be able to do to Lewis at all.
elmersalsa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15706
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50

Re: Is Lenox Lewis A Top Ten Heavyweight?

Post by elmersalsa »

Grimm wrote:

Holyfield and Tyson?....Maybe.

Douglas was a lucky bum, who did nothing but luckily knock Tyson out.

Walcott was much too small yes he was skilled but he would two step his way into being knocked out.

And I can't see anything that Charles would be able to do to Lewis at all.
The Buster Douglas that beat Tyson in Tokyo was excellent. Any version of Lennox Lewis would lose to that one.

Jersey Joe Walcott, even at 37, was better boxer, better counter puncher, and better skilled

Holyfield and Tyson would eat Lennox Lewis for dinner in their primes.

Even the Oscar Bonavena that fought Ali in 1970 would have beaten Lennox Lewis.
George Chuvalo? a tossed up.
p4p1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5854
Joined: 23 Apr 2007, 07:43

Re: Is Lenox Lewis A Top Ten Heavyweight?

Post by p4p1 »

elmersalsa wrote:
Grimm wrote:

Holyfield and Tyson?....Maybe.

Douglas was a lucky bum, who did nothing but luckily knock Tyson out.

Walcott was much too small yes he was skilled but he would two step his way into being knocked out.

And I can't see anything that Charles would be able to do to Lewis at all.
The Buster Douglas that beat Tyson in Tokyo was excellent. Any version of Lennox Lewis would lose to that one.

Jersey Joe Walcott, even at 37, was better boxer, better counter puncher, and better skilled

Holyfield and Tyson would eat Lennox Lewis for dinner in their primes.

Even the Oscar Bonavena that fought Ali in 1970 would have beaten Lennox Lewis.
George Chuvalo? a tossed up.
i think u have it very wrong the douglas that beat tyson was good but not that great he beat a washed up tyson who had done little training showed little movement lewis is bigger than douglas he couldn use the same style

bonavena no

chuvalo no

holy... toss up

tyson... possibaly

charles and walcott wouldnt have the size to do it
Knucklez
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 387
Joined: 16 Oct 2006, 14:26

Re: Is Lenox Lewis A Top Ten Heavyweight?

Post by Knucklez »

elmersalsa wrote:



Elmer,

Lewis lost to two fighters he should not have, there is no question about that at all. However using the two knockout shots as evidence of his poor chin is misguided. Both the McCall and the Rahman right hands were thrown at full force and landed squarely on Lewis' chin. i.e. both were knock out shots.

While there's no doubt that they were shots that Lewis should not have be open to in the first place, to label Lewis as chinny because of those two shots is a lazy description.

You also use the first Bowe-Holyfield fight as a testament to Bowe's chin, yet most people know that Holyfield was not a big puncher at heavyweight in the slightest. Even the commentators during the fight spoke about it at length, on US and UK TV stations. I'll repeat the point I made earlier: Bowe was knocked down and nearly out by the light-punching, unwell, drained and over the hill Holyfield in their 3rd fight. Please explain how this proves Bowe's chin to be superior to Lewis'. Lewis took full force shots from Tua, VK and Mercer better than Bowe did from Holyfield and Golota.

I'm also not clear how you can place Bowe higher than Lewis, when Bowe's "peak" was about 4 fights long while Lewis was the dominant heavy over a much longer period.
Holyfield hit hard enough to put any heavyweight in the floor. He almost put a 250 pound George Foreman in the canvas.

David Tua never hit Lewis..He was far from the fight. He was not agressive enough.
Vitali Klitshko was going to knock him out in matter of time...He was denied.
Ray Mercer never hit him clean. Plus Mercer is awkard and clumsy. He only had a great chin and stamina. That is about it.
Holyfield "almost" put a 41 year old George Foreman on the floor. Wow, he must be the second coming of Earnie Shavers then :roll:

David Tua landed several right and left hooks flush on Lewis. Watch the footage.

Have a look at Lewis' face after the Mercer fight and then tell me Mercer didn't hit him clean. Watch the footage.

Saying VK "was going to knock him out in time" is pure speculation, nothing more. You sound like a child.

VK was not denied, he had large facial lacerations that required something like 60 stitches. I've seen fights stopped for far less severe cuts that that, as have you.

Little tip for you Elmer, try actually watching the fights you are discussing, you'll find it helps your arguments.
Crease
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16865
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 10:19

Re: Is Lennox Lewis A Top Ten Heavyweight?

Post by Crease »

Rob h said

"and Moore and Marciano was a known fix"...


HA HA HA HA HE HE HE HE HE.

You people would say anything to discredit a true great, y'know.
TheOneIsHere2008
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1181
Joined: 01 Jul 2008, 12:09

Re: Is Lennox Lewis A Top Ten Heavyweight?

Post by TheOneIsHere2008 »

Crease wrote:Rob h said

"and Moore and Marciano was a known fix"...


HA HA HA HA HE HE HE HE HE.

You people would say anything to discredit a true great, y'know.

Too much "fix" talk on this board without evidence...Reminds me of the people who say 9-11 was a inside job without evidence...
Crease
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16865
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 10:19

Re: Is Lennox Lewis A Top Ten Heavyweight?

Post by Crease »

It's the same as me saying that Ali and Foreman was a fix... George didn't really hit Ali that hard in the first rounds because he would've KO'd Muhammad.
Jaywheel
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2697
Joined: 19 Mar 2008, 12:14

Re: Is Lenox Lewis A Top Ten Heavyweight?

Post by Jaywheel »

elmersalsa wrote: Vitali Klitshko was going to knock him out in matter of time...He was denied.
History keeps repeating... Rahman was just about to KO Toney a few weeks ago but...denied :roll:
TheOneIsHere2008
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1181
Joined: 01 Jul 2008, 12:09

Re: Is Lennox Lewis A Top Ten Heavyweight?

Post by TheOneIsHere2008 »

Crease wrote:It's the same as me saying that Ali and Foreman was a fix... George didn't really hit Ali that hard in the first rounds because he would've KO'd Muhammad.

He had Ali out on his feet in the second round...The man could take a wallop like nobody's busines...

That was his blessing and perhaps his curse...I guess it depends on how you look at it...
dempseyfire
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5534
Joined: 29 Oct 2003, 22:56

Re: Is Lennox Lewis A Top Ten Heavyweight?

Post by dempseyfire »

How is Holyfield a toss up and Walcott, as naturally big as Evander and stronger/a better puncher, too small?

Lewis-Chuvalo? Over 12 Lennox can eke out a points win. Over 15, I confidently take the Washer Woman.
Cap
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1513
Joined: 07 Aug 2004, 11:44

Re: Is Lennox Lewis A Top Ten Heavyweight?

Post by Cap »

dempseyfire wrote:How is Holyfield a toss up and Walcott, as naturally big as Evander and stronger/a better puncher, too small?

Lewis-Chuvalo? Over 12 Lennox can eke out a points win. Over 15, I confidently take the Washer Woman.
Only Cassius Clay fans refer to George Chuvalo by that disparaging slur. Much like Clay calling Frazier the Ape.
dempseyfire
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5534
Joined: 29 Oct 2003, 22:56

Re: Is Lennox Lewis A Top Ten Heavyweight?

Post by dempseyfire »

Cap wrote:
dempseyfire wrote:How is Holyfield a toss up and Walcott, as naturally big as Evander and stronger/a better puncher, too small?

Lewis-Chuvalo? Over 12 Lennox can eke out a points win. Over 15, I confidently take the Washer Woman.
Only Cassius Clay fans refer to George Chuvalo by that disparaging slur. Much like Clay calling Frazier the Ape.
I hope you're joking. Chuvalo himself laughs about it.
TheOneIsHere2008
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1181
Joined: 01 Jul 2008, 12:09

Re: Is Lennox Lewis A Top Ten Heavyweight?

Post by TheOneIsHere2008 »

dempseyfire wrote:
Cap wrote:
dempseyfire wrote:How is Holyfield a toss up and Walcott, as naturally big as Evander and stronger/a better puncher, too small?

Lewis-Chuvalo? Over 12 Lennox can eke out a points win. Over 15, I confidently take the Washer Woman.
Only Cassius Clay fans refer to George Chuvalo by that disparaging slur. Much like Clay calling Frazier the Ape.
I hope you're joking. Chuvalo himself laughs about it.
It wasn't meant as a slur:


BL: Ali was famous for giving his opponents nicknames. Sonny Liston was the Bear, Joe Frazier was the Gorilla. He nicknamed you the "Washer Woman." Do you know what he meant by that?

GC: In September of 1963, I beat Mike Dejohn, knocked him colder than Missouri mule. I knocked him out with a left hook and pummeled him over the ropes. It didn’t occur to me until twenty five years later in 1988 why he called me the "Washer Woman." It was because in the fight with Dejohn, I had his back draped way over the ropes and I already had him knocked out. I had him pinned against the ropes and I started pummeling him, just beating on a knocked out guy. It looked like I was working on a scrub board. That’s why he called me the "Washer Woman." It sounds uncomplimentary but it really wasn’t. Ali said George Chuvalo fights rough and tough like a "Washer Woman." It was a kind of a cute term.

http://cyberboxingzone.com/boxing/chuvalo.htm
elmersalsa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15706
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50

Re: Is Lenox Lewis A Top Ten Heavyweight?

Post by elmersalsa »

Knucklez wrote:
elmersalsa wrote:



Elmer,

Lewis lost to two fighters he should not have, there is no question about that at all. However using the two knockout shots as evidence of his poor chin is misguided. Both the McCall and the Rahman right hands were thrown at full force and landed squarely on Lewis' chin. i.e. both were knock out shots.

While there's no doubt that they were shots that Lewis should not have be open to in the first place, to label Lewis as chinny because of those two shots is a lazy description.

You also use the first Bowe-Holyfield fight as a testament to Bowe's chin, yet most people know that Holyfield was not a big puncher at heavyweight in the slightest. Even the commentators during the fight spoke about it at length, on US and UK TV stations. I'll repeat the point I made earlier: Bowe was knocked down and nearly out by the light-punching, unwell, drained and over the hill Holyfield in their 3rd fight. Please explain how this proves Bowe's chin to be superior to Lewis'. Lewis took full force shots from Tua, VK and Mercer better than Bowe did from Holyfield and Golota.

I'm also not clear how you can place Bowe higher than Lewis, when Bowe's "peak" was about 4 fights long while Lewis was the dominant heavy over a much longer period.
Holyfield hit hard enough to put any heavyweight in the floor. He almost put a 250 pound George Foreman in the canvas.

David Tua never hit Lewis..He was far from the fight. He was not agressive enough.
Vitali Klitshko was going to knock him out in matter of time...He was denied.
Ray Mercer never hit him clean. Plus Mercer is awkard and clumsy. He only had a great chin and stamina. That is about it.
Holyfield "almost" put a 41 year old George Foreman on the floor. Wow, he must be the second coming of Earnie Shavers then :roll:

David Tua landed several right and left hooks flush on Lewis. Watch the footage.

Have a look at Lewis' face after the Mercer fight and then tell me Mercer didn't hit him clean. Watch the footage.

Saying VK "was going to knock him out in time" is pure speculation, nothing more. You sound like a child.

VK was not denied, he had large facial lacerations that required something like 60 stitches. I've seen fights stopped for far less severe cuts that that, as have you.

Little tip for you Elmer, try actually watching the fights you are discussing, you'll find it helps your arguments.
Getting KO'd by 2 bums that are not even in Tyson's league proves me that this Lewis guy was nothing to be HIGH ABOUT. I don't care if he avenged those wins, the bottom line was HE SHOULD HAVE NOT LOSE TO THOSE BUMS AT NO TIME AT ALL IN HIS PRIME.
oliverfennell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5564
Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37

Re: Is Lenox Lewis A Top Ten Heavyweight?

Post by oliverfennell »

elmersalsa wrote:Getting KO'd by 2 bums that are not even in Tyson's league proves me that this Lewis guy was nothing to be HIGH ABOUT. I don't care if he avenged those wins, the bottom line was HE SHOULD HAVE NOT LOSE TO THOSE BUMS AT NO TIME AT ALL IN HIS PRIME.
Didn't Tyson get knocked out by a number of "bums" not even in Lewis' league, and NOT avenge them?
oliverfennell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5564
Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37

Re: Is Lennox Lewis A Top Ten Heavyweight?

Post by oliverfennell »

He wasn't past his prime, Terry. If he trained properly, he could win the titles back even now!
Post Reply