Paul Williams v Michael Jennings close

Post Reply
chinny
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1536
Joined: 18 Jun 2007, 09:33

Paul Williams v Michael Jennings close

Post by chinny »

according to the bottom of this. Steve Kim gets this from Dan Goosen. Either jennings or Collazo on Nov 29.

http://www.maxboxing.com/Kim/Kim080508.asp

Another Pavlik - Lockett on the cards
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Paul Williams v Michael Jennings close

Post by whiskey »

God i hope Mick gets a shot at last..
sweetscience
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2816
Joined: 22 Sep 2004, 09:09

Re: Paul Williams v Michael Jennings close

Post by sweetscience »

i hope not

there are levels & there are levels

Mick would be better with a euro shot
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Paul Williams v Michael Jennings close

Post by leforge »

A stoppage defeat I see being the only conclusion
E
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Paul Williams v Michael Jennings close

Post by E »

wiliams KO 1
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Paul Williams v Michael Jennings close

Post by whiskey »

He will make some money and get some good exposure.

Coming off a loss to Williams will perhaps make him more marketable, especially if he holds his own.
oliverfennell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5564
Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37

Re: Paul Williams v Michael Jennings close

Post by oliverfennell »

But he won't
DavidPayne
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6248
Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00

Re: Paul Williams v Michael Jennings close

Post by DavidPayne »

Williams wont knock Micky over in one. Thats absurbed.

I think Jennings is very good, granted Williams is about as awkward as you can get for your shot and will make's Micks natural style hard to implement...but Jennings can box properly and is gutsy. Dont think Williams dumps him that fast. Wins yeh, but KO1 - come on.
oliverfennell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5564
Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37

Re: Paul Williams v Michael Jennings close

Post by oliverfennell »

I would agree it was absurbed, if I knew what it meant.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27503
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Paul Williams v Michael Jennings close

Post by stujones »

Sorry, I think Williams wins early. Jennings has been hurt in the past.... Bradley Pryce had him at sea, as did Mutley.... even Ross Minter gained some respect.

Williams is a monster puncher compared to these, and quick. Williams is arguably the best Welter in the world.

If this was Quintana vs Jennings - then it might be different, still Quintana would be a heavy favourite - but I think Jennings could hold his own.... Williams though has every possible advantage. I do see another Pavlik vs Lockett.
Deserter
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6439
Joined: 04 Sep 2003, 10:01

Re: Paul Williams v Michael Jennings close

Post by Deserter »

DavidPayne wrote:Williams wont knock Micky over in one. Thats absurbed.

I think Jennings is very good, granted Williams is about as awkward as you can get for your shot and will make's Micks natural style hard to implement...but Jennings can box properly and is gutsy. Dont think Williams dumps him that fast. Wins yeh, but KO1 - come on.
It's hardly absurd when he's just blown Quintana out in the first and Quintana is a better fighter than Jennings. However, I love Jennings' style and concede that if you were betting on it you'd expect him to last to the halfway stage, though you can't rule out 'stage fright' given it would be a massive step-up in class.
DavidPayne
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6248
Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00

Re: Paul Williams v Michael Jennings close

Post by DavidPayne »

oliverfennell wrote:I would agree it was absurbed, if I knew what it meant.
I always struggle with that. And words with ley or ly or ely on he end.

I can spell twat though.
EddieShredder
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Paul Williams v Michael Jennings close

Post by EddieShredder »

I like Mick, good solid fighter, and seems a really nice lad....

Got to say though, that as much as I wan't him to do well, the best he can do here is "look good losing". Ultimately this will be a story of levels, and Williams might well make an easy night's money.

Shame, because Jennings is one of my favorite brit fighters, and one i've always wanted to succeed.... but Williams is as awkward as they come, and Mick doesn't have the dig to make any kind of impact IMO.
steve689
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9661
Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50

Re: Paul Williams v Michael Jennings close

Post by steve689 »

What's this new trend of fighters beating low ranked opposition and sitting tight until a world title shot falls into their laps? Does nobody work their way up the rankings and win an eliminator etc. anymore?! :o
Captain Hook
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4730
Joined: 07 May 2007, 09:40

Re: Paul Williams v Michael Jennings close

Post by Captain Hook »

DavidPayne wrote:
oliverfennell wrote:I would agree it was absurbed, if I knew what it meant.
I always struggle with that. And words with ley or ly or ely on he end.

I can spell twat though.
He was being a bit facetious, must be his new pals over in the Far East :)

Jennings will get halfway at least, he's no mug, he deserves more credit than he's getting.

I appreciate Williams is a class above, but he won't knock out Mick in 1.
Post Reply