DeGale SPOILER
DeGale SPOILER
Hello lads
If you are a user of BBN, please bookmark our new amateur site as that's where our Olympic coverage will be. I'll link from BBN as not many people know about the ams site but it will save you messing about:
www.britishamateurboxing.net/
DeGale:
http://www.britishamateurboxing.net/new ... paign.html
If you are a user of BBN, please bookmark our new amateur site as that's where our Olympic coverage will be. I'll link from BBN as not many people know about the ams site but it will save you messing about:
www.britishamateurboxing.net/
DeGale:
http://www.britishamateurboxing.net/new ... paign.html
-
Old bones Ian
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 11806
- Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33
Re: DeGale SPOILER
I thought DeGale looked fine after a nervous first round, he was always going to find it hard to start with ,there was alot of pressure on his shoulders being the first British guy boxing.
Was impressed by the Russian guy in an earlier bout, he looks a real strong handfull.
Was impressed by the Russian guy in an earlier bout, he looks a real strong handfull.
-
TerribleTerry
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5272
- Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 12:30
Re: DeGale SPOILER
Kenneth Egan (IRE) is through, winning at a canter (22 - 2) with a solid, relaxed display of back foot boxing.
Re: DeGale SPOILER
Julian Jackson's lad (good to see The Hawk in the corner) was incredibly slow though. Well done to Egan, however.TerribleTerry wrote:Kenneth Egan (IRE) is through, winning at a canter (22 - 2) with a solid, relaxed display of back foot boxing.
-
Old bones Ian
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 11806
- Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33
Re: DeGale SPOILER
Egan looked good, but Julius Jackson was made for him, was good to see his dad (Julian) looking so well in the corner.
Anyone think that the scoring in the Chinese lightheavies bout was a bit dodgy? Thought the Tunisian landed more than 1 punch. Hope thats not a sign of things to come
Anyone think that the scoring in the Chinese lightheavies bout was a bit dodgy? Thought the Tunisian landed more than 1 punch. Hope thats not a sign of things to come
Re: DeGale SPOILER
The scoring is about as reliable as the SATs exams.Old bones Ian wrote:Egan looked good, but Julius Jackson was made for him, was good to see his dad (Julian) looking so well in the corner.
Anyone think that the scoring in the Chinese lightheavies bout was a bit dodgy? Thought the Tunisian landed more than 1 punch. Hope thats not a sign of things to come
Re: DeGale SPOILER
Nothing wrong with the SATS marking. I got three A* 
Re: DeGale SPOILER
SATs are for 14-year-olds, you clown! And you get a number, not a letter.steve689 wrote:Nothing wrong with the SATS marking. I got three A*
I assume you mean GCSEs - well done though!
Re: DeGale SPOILER
Ha Ha no not GCSE's but with my limited intellect i could easily get a job marking the SATS papers i would imagine 
-
TerribleTerry
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5272
- Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 12:30
Re: DeGale SPOILER
Yeah, at one point I thought that the computer might have broken down!Old bones Ian wrote: Anyone think that the scoring in the Chinese lightheavies bout was a bit dodgy? Thought the Tunisian landed more than 1 punch. Hope thats not a sign of things to come
Computer scoring was brought in to get away from the Roy Jones style fiascos, lets just hope the judges remember to hit the button for the Chinese fighter's opponents once in a while.
Re: DeGale SPOILER
Congratulations James, excellent win
Re: DeGale SPOILER
Degale has got to beat the Russian to MEDAL let alone win gold.
Re: DeGale SPOILER
Yes. I take it you think this is beyond him? I'm also distressed by your use of a noun as a verb, though everyone seems to be doing it these days. 8)Gray-Fox wrote:Degale has got to beat the Russian to MEDAL let alone win gold.
Re: DeGale SPOILER
Thought both Degale and Egan's opponents efforts merited more on the scoreboard than they got although there's no doubt that both were comfortable winners. It seems to me that once a boxer has established a clear lead the judges seem to only see that boxer and score his work while the guy who's behind has to work that much harder for his scores. Not that this is specific to these Olympics, I think it's been that way in all the major tournaments recently.
Re: DeGale SPOILER
LOL, I have succumbed to the amateur speak...Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:Yes. I take it you think this is beyond him? I'm also distressed by your use of a noun as a verb, though everyone seems to be doing it these days. 8)Gray-Fox wrote:Degale has got to beat the Russian to MEDAL let alone win gold.
Saying it is beyond him is wrong, anyone can beat anyone in the Olympics...but Korobov is a serious operator and performs when he has to.
Re: DeGale SPOILER
actually, kids sit the SATS at 11.
-
TerribleTerry
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5272
- Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 12:30
Re: DeGale SPOILER
To my limited knowledge SATs are used as assessments at 3 'key stages':
Year 2 (Age 7) Year 6 (Age 11) & Year 8 (Age 14).
Dunno what that has got to do with boxing, but there you go..
Year 2 (Age 7) Year 6 (Age 11) & Year 8 (Age 14).
Dunno what that has got to do with boxing, but there you go..
Re: DeGale SPOILER
Actually, I know. See TT's more comprehensive response.harrygreb wrote:actually, kids sit the SATS at 11.
And, if you want to be pedantic, SATs don't actually exist. They are the National Curriculum Tests and SATs is merely a nickname.
It's Year 9 for the 14-year-olds, TT.
-
black panther
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4097
- Joined: 11 Dec 2003, 07:06
Re: DeGale SPOILER
Well done to Saunders for beating Killici. Saunders must be a nightmare to fight with his southpaw, lean-back elusive style.
-
TerribleTerry
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5272
- Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 12:30
Re: DeGale SPOILER
Bradley Suanders fight live now
Re: DeGale SPOILER
Great body shots. Lovely victory.TerribleTerry wrote:Bradley Suanders fight live now
Re: DeGale SPOILER
Matvey Korobov – the Russian middleweight – is awesome. Probably the best amateur at any weight. It'll take an almost superhuman effort from DeGale to topple him. Still, he's got to get past the American first.
-
TerribleTerry
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5272
- Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 12:30
Re: DeGale SPOILER
Good to get your view of things Ulysses - any comments on Gavin-gate?
-
TerribleTerry
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5272
- Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 12:30
Re: DeGale SPOILER
below is part of a Korobov fight from last years world championships - he certainly looks a handfulUlysses wrote:Matvey Korobov – the Russian middleweight – is awesome. Probably the best amateur at any weight. It'll take an almost superhuman effort from DeGale to topple him. Still, he's got to get past the American first.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hZ1ucbmx ... re=related
Re: DeGale SPOILER
Well, he was buggered when he won the Worlds in Chicago. And then when Bradley Saunders won bronze at 64 – thus qualifying for Beijing – he was double buggered!
It's said that he struggled terribly at the weight in Chicago, yet he produced the performances of his career to win the tournament.
They had to give him every opportunity to make the weight right up til the final hour. You have to assume they thought the heat and humidity of China would shift the final few pounds.
Depending on which way you look at it, it's a major cock-up or just terribly sad.
It's said that he struggled terribly at the weight in Chicago, yet he produced the performances of his career to win the tournament.
They had to give him every opportunity to make the weight right up til the final hour. You have to assume they thought the heat and humidity of China would shift the final few pounds.
Depending on which way you look at it, it's a major cock-up or just terribly sad.