Yes - it was revamp or the IOC was going to drop boxing from the Olympics. Under the old manual system a judge could, literally, pick whoever he wanted by putting 20-19 in all four rounds for the red corner, or vice versa. He didn't even have to count punches. This is what happened with Roy Jones in 1988. Two judges had it for Roy and two had it for the South Korean. When interviewed after the bouts, (I think it was the Hungarian judge) said that since he knew RJJ had won, he felt sorry for the South Korean losing in his home country and gave him the win. RJJ lost on a 3-2.He hasn't been hiding and his comment wasn't unsolicited. He wasn't complaining, they asked his opionion and he gave it. I think his point is that there may have been some bad judging in recent Olympiads, but was it enough to completely revamp the system that had been in place for so long?
Referees are not allowed to give a warning in the 4th round - only in the first three.
I agree - and another reason to not have open scoring where the athletes can see the points. Especially since everyone has a really hard time with the "accepted" points - and I understand why.Low scores are bad because boxers feel cheated especially when they don't credit for any punches that land in a 0 point round.
Maybe AIBA didn't equate the lack of protests with high scoring, if that was even the reason?AIBA did proudly proclaim that there were no scoring protests in Chicago, making it curious that they would change their guidance -