"when we were kings" ... how wrong a view

Post Reply
man
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3197
Joined: 09 Jul 2007, 10:38

"when we were kings" ... how wrong a view

Post by man »

i saw the documentary before i saw the full fight. i believe that
"when we were kings" is - intentionally or not - painting a completely
wrong picture of the fight. ali was ahead on all cards i believe and
he had foreman near a knock out at the end of the fifth. ali was in
more or less full control of the fight at any point. and the sequences
of ali against the ropes, leaning back "doing the roperdop" are pretty
rare ...

ali could place his punches at will; almost each and every jab got in.
it was an entertaining fight. but foreman was almost embarrassingly
weak in his defense IMHO.

nevertheless the real end was somehow strange. ali knocked him down
at almost exactly ten seconds before the end of round and foreman
was up at eight. wobbly, but up and with literally no time left in the
round the referee should have given the reigning champ the chance
to recover in the break ... it was a tough decision in my eyes. in my
opinion tougher than taylor-chavez ...
allworld80
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3468
Joined: 09 Dec 2006, 20:12

Re: "when we were kings" ... how wrong a view

Post by allworld80 »

If Foreman or his camp had put up any protest at the stoppage, I might agree. Foreman was toast. I do agree with Ali being in complete control. George was the raging bull, and Ali the great matador. :TU:
TheOneIsHere2008
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1181
Joined: 01 Jul 2008, 12:09

Re: "when we were kings" ... how wrong a view

Post by TheOneIsHere2008 »

man wrote:i saw the documentary before i saw the full fight. i believe that
"when we were kings" is - intentionally or not - painting a completely
wrong picture of the fight. ali was ahead on all cards i believe and
he had foreman near a knock out at the end of the fifth. ali was in
more or less full control of the fight at any point. and the sequences
of ali against the ropes, leaning back "doing the roperdop" are pretty
rare ...

ali could place his punches at will; almost each and every jab got in.
it was an entertaining fight. but foreman was almost embarrassingly
weak in his defense IMHO.

nevertheless the real end was somehow strange. ali knocked him down
at almost exactly ten seconds before the end of round and foreman
was up at eight. wobbly, but up and with literally no time left in the
round the referee should have given the reigning champ the chance
to recover in the break ... it was a tough decision in my eyes. in my
opinion tougher than taylor-chavez ...
Never mind the jab...Ali hit Foreman with twelve right hand leads in the first round:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yyR7n3A5abo

An amateur should be able to deflect a right hand lead or at least most of them...

And he was winning most of the rounds:

Zach Clayton 4-2-1 Ali, Nourridine Adalla 3-0-4 Ali, and James Taylor 4-1-2 Ali

And if you watch the knock out Ali could have hit George , legally, one more time as he fell:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gok2z-mW ... re=related


There would have been no controversy over the count then but Foreman might have been seriously hurt...Nine out of ten fighters, imho, would have hit Foreman once more...
Brutu
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3273
Joined: 15 Jan 2005, 23:07

Re: "when we were kings" ... how wrong a view

Post by Brutu »

Check out the movie MUHAMMAD ALI,THE GREATEST.
Its a documentery about Ali's two fights with Liston and George Foreman.
I thought that movie captured more of a feel of the fight in Zaire,it sort of felt like a a 60 minutes investigation show.
man
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3197
Joined: 09 Jul 2007, 10:38

Re: "when we were kings" ... how wrong a view

Post by man »

you are right! each time i see it i love ali for holding back that last shot.
(the one that david tua did not hold back against ruiz.)
man
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3197
Joined: 09 Jul 2007, 10:38

Re: "when we were kings" ... how wrong a view

Post by man »

Brutu wrote:Check out the movie MUHAMMAD ALI,THE GREATEST.
Its a documentery about Ali's two fights with Liston and George Foreman.
I thought that movie captured more of a feel of the fight in Zaire,it sort of felt like a a 60 minutes investigation show.
thnx. i will.
TheOneIsHere2008
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1181
Joined: 01 Jul 2008, 12:09

Re: "when we were kings" ... how wrong a view

Post by TheOneIsHere2008 »

man wrote:you are right! each time i see it i love ali for holding back that last shot.
(the one that david tua did not hold back against ruiz.)
Foreman calls it the best punch Muhammad Ali never threw...
hoodsyeahright
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 31
Joined: 15 Aug 2008, 04:23

Re: "when we were kings" ... how wrong a view

Post by hoodsyeahright »

I have always thought the count was too quick and Foreman was looking to his corner to make sure he got up at the right time.

Wouldn't have made any difference though.
dajuggernaut
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 441
Joined: 22 Jul 2006, 22:43

Re: "when we were kings" ... how wrong a view

Post by dajuggernaut »

The fight was on ESPN Classic last week. Foreman was in studio and talking about it. He said something to the degree that Ali was a great gentleman for not hitting him one more time. He was really grateful about that.

About the stoppage: he said at the time of the fight he felt he could come back after the knockout and try to win. The more he watched it and thought about it he realized that if he would of continued that Ali would of battered him some more. That was straight out of Big George's own mouth.
Robinson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4415
Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 22:34

Re: "when we were kings" ... how wrong a view

Post by Robinson »

When I saw it in 1997 I enjoyed it, I was happy to see something
about boxing do well.

I never liked the fact that the showed nothing from Foreman's
side or gave him any spoken time...I suppose the Foreman they
were portraying (menacing, thug like violent force of nature) is
nothing like how the real Foreman would have come across in an
interview.

Something for Ali fans, casual fans and the likes to rally around
and talk about how great Ali was because some writers like Plimpton,
and the likes have an opinion.

Well done production, interesting to know some of the back story (which
today is so overly covered-'Ali', 'Only in America') and was good to
see some of the convert footage.
man
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3197
Joined: 09 Jul 2007, 10:38

Re: "when we were kings" ... how wrong a view

Post by man »

dajuggernaut wrote:The fight was on ESPN Classic last week. Foreman was in studio and talking about it. He said something to the degree that Ali was a great gentleman for not hitting him one more time. He was really grateful about that.

About the stoppage: he said at the time of the fight he felt he could come back after the knockout and try to win. The more he watched it and thought about it he realized that if he would of continued that Ali would of battered him some more. That was straight out of Big George's own mouth.
i am just concerned by the oneSidedNess of things here. everybody was so happy with
ali winning, that nobody asked if the champ was treated fair. and i think he wasn't no
matter if he was to lose later on anyways. at this particular moment the referee could
have done better. just look at foreman-lyle. plenty of opportunity to take one out earlier.
TheOneIsHere2008
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1181
Joined: 01 Jul 2008, 12:09

Re: "when we were kings" ... how wrong a view

Post by TheOneIsHere2008 »

man wrote:
dajuggernaut wrote:The fight was on ESPN Classic last week. Foreman was in studio and talking about it. He said something to the degree that Ali was a great gentleman for not hitting him one more time. He was really grateful about that.

About the stoppage: he said at the time of the fight he felt he could come back after the knockout and try to win. The more he watched it and thought about it he realized that if he would of continued that Ali would of battered him some more. That was straight out of Big George's own mouth.
i am just concerned by the oneSidedNess of things here. everybody was so happy with
ali winning, that nobody asked if the champ was treated fair. and i think he wasn't no
matter if he was to lose later on anyways. at this particular moment the referee could
have done better. just look at foreman-lyle. plenty of opportunity to take one out earlier.
Maybe the ref saved Foreman from embarrassment or permanent injury...After he had tired George out, Ali planned to dance around him for a few rounds and pepper him with jabs....

Also, Foreman was down 6-2 with seven rounds to go..He would have needed to win six of the next eight rounds...If you watch the fight closely Foreman was ripe after round five to go...
allworld80
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3468
Joined: 09 Dec 2006, 20:12

Re: "when we were kings" ... how wrong a view

Post by allworld80 »

Robinson wrote: I never liked the fact that the showed nothing from Foreman's
side or gave him any spoken time...I suppose the Foreman they
were portraying (menacing, thug like violent force of nature) is
nothing like how the real Foreman would have come across in an
interview.
I've heard both sides of the argument. A lot of people from that time will say the real Foreman is the one that you saw back then. Very ill tempered, angry, and abusive. Foreman himself said in a 60 minutes interview that he was a bad person, and that he was a thug in his younger days. Along with the admittance of hitting women, and so forth. I also think the whole happy go lucky George of today is not an act either. Maturity, religon, or whatever the reason, caused him to change.
Robinson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4415
Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 22:34

Re: "when we were kings" ... how wrong a view

Post by Robinson »

Very true.
TheOneIsHere2008
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1181
Joined: 01 Jul 2008, 12:09

Re: "when we were kings" ... how wrong a view

Post by TheOneIsHere2008 »

tzyuforever wrote:
Robinson wrote: I never liked the fact that the showed nothing from Foreman's
side or gave him any spoken time...I suppose the Foreman they
were portraying (menacing, thug like violent force of nature) is
nothing like how the real Foreman would have come across in an
interview.
I've heard both sides of the argument. A lot of people from that time will say the real Foreman is the one that you saw back then. Very ill tempered, angry, and abusive. Foreman himself said in a 60 minutes interview that he was a bad person, and that he was a thug in his younger days. Along with the admittance of hitting women, and so forth. I also think the whole happy go lucky George of today is not an act either. Maturity, religon, or whatever the reason, caused him to change.

Foreman said he had an ephiphany after the Young fight...That he is when he retired and became a minister...
Robinson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4415
Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 22:34

Re: "when we were kings" ... how wrong a view

Post by Robinson »

Foreman like any many is complicated and has many
different characteristics to many different people.

I think Foreman while he always seemed grateful towards
LBJ and his domestic policies, his trainers and handlers...
seemed to feel (and rightly so) that by the boxing people,
he was never treated like a champion....he was treated
like another Ali opponent.
raylawpc
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4871
Joined: 21 Mar 2008, 17:21

Re: "when we were kings" ... how wrong a view

Post by raylawpc »

tzyuforever wrote:
Robinson wrote: I never liked the fact that the showed nothing from Foreman's
side or gave him any spoken time...I suppose the Foreman they
were portraying (menacing, thug like violent force of nature) is
nothing like how the real Foreman would have come across in an
interview.
I've heard both sides of the argument. A lot of people from that time will say the real Foreman is the one that you saw back then. Very ill tempered, angry, and abusive. Foreman himself said in a 60 minutes interview that he was a bad person, and that he was a thug in his younger days. Along with the admittance of hitting women, and so forth. I also think the whole happy go lucky George of today is not an act either. Maturity, religon, or whatever the reason, caused him to change.
I only met him one time, but I remember him as quiet and well mannered. Certainly not a "bad ass."
raylawpc
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4871
Joined: 21 Mar 2008, 17:21

Re: "when we were kings" ... how wrong a view

Post by raylawpc »

Maybe they didn't show Foreman's side because they didn't want an x rating. Dick Sadler told my friend Pat O'Grady that Foreman did a good amount of his training in the bedroom. He told Pat that they couldn't keep Foreman off the girls. I don't know if it's true, but I know Dick said it.
observer1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1836
Joined: 27 Nov 2007, 22:30

Re: "when we were kings" ... how wrong a view

Post by observer1 »

TheOneIsHere2008 wrote:
man wrote:you are right! each time i see it i love ali for holding back that last shot.
(the one that david tua did not hold back against ruiz.)
Foreman calls it the best punch Muhammad Ali never threw...
Another reason why Ali is a legend, :D
overhand_right
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: "when we were kings" ... how wrong a view

Post by overhand_right »

All the quick counts in the world wont diguise the fact Foreman was on his way out against Ali, if he'd of got up Ali would of taken him to the cleaners anyway.
Robinson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4415
Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 22:34

Re: "when we were kings" ... how wrong a view

Post by Robinson »

raylawpc wrote:Maybe they didn't show Foreman's side because they didn't want an x rating. Dick Sadler told my friend Pat O'Grady that Foreman did a good amount of his training in the bedroom. He told Pat that they couldn't keep Foreman off the girls. I don't know if it's true, but I know Dick said it.
From all accounts Ali was himself known as a pants man....
most athletes are...even ultra religious ones like Holyfield.
man
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3197
Joined: 09 Jul 2007, 10:38

Re: "when we were kings" ... how wrong a view

Post by man »

overhand_right wrote:All the quick counts in the world wont diguise the fact Foreman was on his way out against Ali, if he'd of got up Ali would of taken him to the cleaners anyway.
i don't dispute that, but i challenge the view of the public,
including the referee. i believe it had been the other way
round and ali would have been counted out like that there
would be riots ... to this day ... (:))

the other thing on foreman having been a bad person, one
must not forget that he came out of poor circumstances and
had become olympic champion and undisputed, "invincible"
heavy weight champion at age 24. that can make you a little
off-ground in many respects.
man
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3197
Joined: 09 Jul 2007, 10:38

Re: "when we were kings" ... how wrong a view

Post by man »

raylawpc wrote:Maybe they didn't show Foreman's side because they didn't want an x rating. Dick Sadler told my friend Pat O'Grady that Foreman did a good amount of his training in the bedroom. He told Pat that they couldn't keep Foreman off the girls. I don't know if it's true, but I know Dick said it.
:)
Knucklez
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 387
Joined: 16 Oct 2006, 14:26

Re: "when we were kings" ... how wrong a view

Post by Knucklez »

Clayton's count was at 9 when Foreman stood up and just wandered off to his corner.
Robinson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4415
Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 22:34

Re: "when we were kings" ... how wrong a view

Post by Robinson »

What made Ali the good guy and Foreman the bad one ?
Post Reply