3 chances at gold

Post Reply
adamheight
Editor
Editor
Posts: 1734
Joined: 03 Apr 2008, 02:28

3 chances at gold

Post by adamheight »

britain gonna see some gold this year?

and if so, who we gonna see it from? price?
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28482
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: 3 chances at gold

Post by Coco »

There has been criticism on here over the British teams performance.
I was of the opinion that the games were successful purely to have 8 rather than 1 qualify.
Now we are going to get 3 medals, possibly 3 golds ! I think that it has been a fantastic performance by the British boys, well done
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: 3 chances at gold

Post by leforge »

I think we will win at least one Gold. A great achivement having 8 boxers there.
Poncey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7525
Joined: 21 May 2007, 07:48

Re: 3 chances at gold

Post by Poncey »

Coco wrote:There has been criticism on here over the British teams performance.
I was of the opinion that the games were successful purely to have 8 rather than 1 qualify.
Now we are going to get 3 medals, possibly 3 golds ! I think that it has been a fantastic performance by the British boys, well done
I think it needs to be put into perspective against other sports. For the amount of money spent (£5m for a total of 8 entrants, one of which didn't even throw a punch in anger), it's not been great compared to other sports like swimming and cycling. However, I hope that UK Sport have set the foundations for future Games, especially as the UK Sport funding is supposed to double for 2012.

All, except one, of the British team that competed tried their hardest (the Bradley Saunders comments where a bit of a piss take).

If we don't get a silver from one of the 3 left, it will be a shame.
Chambers2
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6499
Joined: 24 Feb 2004, 07:24

Re: 3 chances at gold

Post by Chambers2 »

I can't understand the criticsm that our Olympic boxers got on here considering we've gone from 1 boxer to 8.

However somebody needs some criticsm over the Frankie Gavin debacle, why wasn't he entered at the higher weight? why were they so confident that he wasn't going to grow?
Poncey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7525
Joined: 21 May 2007, 07:48

Re: 3 chances at gold

Post by Poncey »

He couldn't have gone to a higher weight because Saunders already was.
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28482
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: 3 chances at gold

Post by Coco »

Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:
Coco wrote:There has been criticism on here over the British teams performance.
I was of the opinion that the games were successful purely to have 8 rather than 1 qualify.
Now we are going to get 3 medals, possibly 3 golds ! I think that it has been a fantastic performance by the British boys, well done
I think it needs to be put into perspective against other sports. For the amount of money spent (£5m for a total of 8 entrants, one of which didn't even throw a punch in anger), it's not been great compared to other sports like swimming and cycling. However, I hope that UK Sport have set the foundations for future Games, especially as the UK Sport funding is supposed to double for 2012.

All, except one, of the British team that competed tried their hardest (the Bradley Saunders comments where a bit of a piss take).

If we don't get a silver from one of the 3 left, it will be a shame.
The money spent is not purely on those boys though, it is on the infrastructure of the sport, we won't see all the benefits immediately.
However it is pleasing to see immediate success in the competition, and such infrastucture should surely benefit out professiona game too
Chambers2
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6499
Joined: 24 Feb 2004, 07:24

Re: 3 chances at gold

Post by Chambers2 »

Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:He couldn't have gone to a higher weight because Saunders already was.
I didn't mean just before the Olympics, I was referring to when they were qualifying for the Olympics 6 to 9 months ago. He should have been looking at qualifying at the higher weight if there was any doubt that he wouldn't be able to make the weight, he was the star of the team and our best chance at gold.
Wales
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7854
Joined: 23 Mar 2004, 14:05

Re: 3 chances at gold

Post by Wales »

I think thats where the slight dissapointment has cme from. The alds we thoguht would get golds and silvers went early, yet three relative underdogs are now one fight from the final...
funso banjo baby
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4417
Joined: 23 Sep 2005, 11:05

Re: 3 chances at gold

Post by funso banjo baby »

its already a great achievement

however price's opps have been dire..... as have jeffries...and egans ...
TerribleTerry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5272
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 12:30

Re: 3 chances at gold

Post by TerribleTerry »

Well done to Degale – cracking performance.

I have always dismissed ‘Chunky’ as a bit of a show pony without the substance to back it up – he is proving me wrong in style.

It would be great to see him bring home gold – I don’t think very many gave him a serious chance of getting this far before the start of the games..

Hitman, it would seem your faith in the lad is well placed (well, you have to get something right every once in a while I suppose!)
hitman_hatton1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6150
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 20:57

Re: 3 chances at gold

Post by hitman_hatton1 »

TerribleTerry wrote:Well Hitman, it would seem your faith in the lad is well placed (well, you have to get something right every once in a while I suppose!)
:TU:

always knew he had the talent.

remember seeing him in the aba's a few years back now (2005 i think).

obvious class. :box:
Post Reply