What does this mean for PPV int he future? Every Khan fight?
Re: What does this mean for PPV int he future? Every Khan fight?
Warren said its not every Khan fight but..........
Re: What does this mean for PPV int he future? Every Khan fight?
I doubt all Khan fights will be ppv, I'm guessing this will be a pretty big failure and they really should of hyped the Scotland(Arthur) v England(Cook) 'World title' fight to try and help sell it. But it seems they've gone with this 'Khan joins the legends' angle which is trying to sell off Khan and Khan alone with little mention of opponent.
SKY have always had adds between rounds for their ppv's, there was nothing new about that. There will be adds for this too I bet.
SKY have always had adds between rounds for their ppv's, there was nothing new about that. There will be adds for this too I bet.
-
Punchy Joe
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 319
- Joined: 25 Feb 2007, 10:17
Re: What does this mean for PPV int he future? Every Khan fight?
I can see Khan fighting duck eggs on PPV for the next 2-3 years, the under cards will feature the rest of Warrens big names.
Sky and Warren are banking(no irony intended) On Khan already being a household name, its being sold as an event - in a kind of wool over the eyes way to the masses.
It might make Warren and sky money in the short term, but its bad for boxing because it marginalises the sport in the long run.
its all very worrying..........
Sky and Warren are banking(no irony intended) On Khan already being a household name, its being sold as an event - in a kind of wool over the eyes way to the masses.
It might make Warren and sky money in the short term, but its bad for boxing because it marginalises the sport in the long run.
its all very worrying..........
-
sweetscience
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2816
- Joined: 22 Sep 2004, 09:09
Re: What does this mean for PPV int he future? Every Khan fight?
IM NOT BUYING THIS BY THE WAYPunchy Joe wrote:I can see Khan fighting duck eggs on PPV for the next 2-3 years, the under cards will feature the rest of Warrens big names.
Sky and Warren are banking(no irony intended) On Khan already being a household name, its being sold as an event - in a kind of wool over the eyes way to the masses.
It might make Warren and sky money in the short term, but its bad for boxing because it marginalises the sport in the long run.
its all very worrying..........
however, i cannot see this PPV bombing like you all think, i dont no the figures but i reckon it will outsell Hatton v Mauusa/Urganotang type cards & shite like WWE Royal Rumble which are all repeatedly sold on PPV
-
Khaosai-Galaxy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2739
- Joined: 29 Apr 2007, 12:15
Re: What does this mean for PPV int he future? Every Khan fight?
I have no ideasearch wrote:Will every Khan fight be on PPV in the future?
ummmm, noWill Degale now be PPV because of his gold medal?
oooh, tough question...What will happen?
I think Brown may turn things round in time for the next election and the price of oil will drop below $100 a barrel this year.
As for flying cars?
I dont think we will see them in our lifetime
oh right.. thats ummmm "interesting news"Obviously every Khan fight from now on is going to be PPV.
Re: What does this mean for PPV int he future? Every Khan fight?
I honestly don't think it will as I just can't see how Khan has a fanbase remotely approaching Hatton's. Does anyone know how well his shows have sold in terms of attendance as I'm sure I read somewhere that a couple have struggled to shift tickets - if that is the case it tells you something...sweetscience wrote:IM NOT BUYING THIS BY THE WAYPunchy Joe wrote:I can see Khan fighting duck eggs on PPV for the next 2-3 years, the under cards will feature the rest of Warrens big names.
Sky and Warren are banking(no irony intended) On Khan already being a household name, its being sold as an event - in a kind of wool over the eyes way to the masses.
It might make Warren and sky money in the short term, but its bad for boxing because it marginalises the sport in the long run.
its all very worrying..........
however, i cannot see this PPV bombing like you all think, i dont no the figures but i reckon it will outsell Hatton v Mauusa/Urganotang type cards & shite like WWE Royal Rumble which are all repeatedly sold on PPV
-
sweetscience
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2816
- Joined: 22 Sep 2004, 09:09
Re: What does this mean for PPV int he future? Every Khan fight?
i dont think you can go off just attendance, my gran who is 80 has watches Khan and has never heard of Hatton, she doesnt go watchin either at the arena, the money is in Arm chair fans, not football hooli wannabeesDeserter wrote:I honestly don't think it will as I just can't see how Khan has a fanbase remotely approaching Hatton's. Does anyone know how well his shows have sold in terms of attendance as I'm sure I read somewhere that a couple have struggled to shift tickets - if that is the case it tells you something...sweetscience wrote:IM NOT BUYING THIS BY THE WAYPunchy Joe wrote:I can see Khan fighting duck eggs on PPV for the next 2-3 years, the under cards will feature the rest of Warrens big names.
Sky and Warren are banking(no irony intended) On Khan already being a household name, its being sold as an event - in a kind of wool over the eyes way to the masses.
It might make Warren and sky money in the short term, but its bad for boxing because it marginalises the sport in the long run.
its all very worrying..........
however, i cannot see this PPV bombing like you all think, i dont no the figures but i reckon it will outsell Hatton v Mauusa/Urganotang type cards & shite like WWE Royal Rumble which are all repeatedly sold on PPV
sky aint daft they would have put this on boxoffice without some serious market research
Re: What does this mean for PPV int he future? Every Khan fight?
No.search wrote:I have almost EVERY PPV from 1996 (the second Tyson Holy fight).BigEars wrote:I doubt all Khan fights will be ppv, I'm guessing this will be a pretty big failure and they really should of hyped the Scotland(Arthur) v England(Cook) 'World title' fight to try and help sell it. But it seems they've gone with this 'Khan joins the legends' angle which is trying to sell off Khan and Khan alone with little mention of opponent.
SKY have always had adds between rounds for their ppv's, there was nothing new about that. There will be adds for this too I bet.
NO adds were in between the rounds of the main events until Hatton Mayweather in 2008 I believe. NO ADDS AT ALL, do you watch boxing?
Seriously though, I don't normally waste money on ppv(why would you ?) so the last one I ordered before Hatton v Mayweather was Hatton v Tszyu and before that Tyson v Lewis. However I seem to remember there being adds during the Hatton-Tszyu fight. Suppose I could be wrong.
You actually paid for Hatton v Haussa and Hatton v Collazo ?,
-
Grilling Machine
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3159
- Joined: 16 Sep 2005, 02:28
Re: What does this mean for PPV int he future? Every Khan fight?
Supposing Khan gets knocked-out on one of these PPV jaunts? I'm sure there'd be a lot of disappointed non-viewers in such an event.
Re: What does this mean for PPV int he future? Every Khan fight?
Of course you can't go purely off attendance, but it's still one highly quantifiable measure of a fighter's popularity that you'd use when you're trying to gauge the appetite for this sort of thing.sweetscience wrote:i dont think you can go off just attendance, my gran who is 80 has watches Khan and has never heard of Hatton, she doesnt go watchin either at the arena, the money is in Arm chair fans, not football hooli wannabees
sky aint daft they would have put this on boxoffice without some serious market research
As for Sky, of course they will have conducted market research, but as anyone in this field will tell you, it's not an exact science. The whole point of PPV is that it potentially alienates 'armchair fans' like your nan who would have been happy to watch him on free-to-air, but don't feel passionate enough about him to shell out £15.
I also think it's a gross error to assume Hatton's popularity lies purely in the 'football hooli wannabees' - his unparallleled success is down to a personna that the average man in the street feels he can relate to. Khan will never be able to replicate this.
-
funso banjo baby
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4417
- Joined: 23 Sep 2005, 11:05
Re: What does this mean for PPV int he future? Every Khan fight?
true sayTerry D wrote:We let the cat out of the bag years ago by paying for the first PPV's. They have now cut down the bills, added adverts and generally rode out arses like pros.
We are to blame for being, collectively, mugs.
we are to blame for the alphabet baubles as well
if u dont pay to watch khan Warren will give in...supply and demand
be strong people
For fistic freedom
-
Bard of Boxrec
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13114
- Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00
Re: What does this mean for PPV int he future? Every Khan fight?
you guys are mugs, just watch it on stream. Get the popcorn in, hopefully Khan gets knocked out, then we get to see Frank's expression for free. Everyone wins!
Re: What does this mean for PPV int he future? Every Khan fight?
I agree, whinging like old women won't get them anywhere, if they don't want to pay £15 to watch it then don't, I'm not buying it especially when it's on BBC within a week.Riddick Blowe wrote:you guys are mugs
Re: What does this mean for PPV int he future? Every Khan fight?
I hardly think anyone coming on here complaining about the PPV is going to cough up the £15 next week... 
FW sky sports deal question.
As franks signed a contract with sky sports will all his bills be on ppv? surely not.
-
WildWaylon
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3223
- Joined: 02 Nov 2005, 13:35
Re: FW sky sports deal question.
Hope not Emma, I wont buy them, but as a friend said to me "will thousands of Asians buy the Khan fight"?
-
MR UNTOUCHABLE
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 109
- Joined: 31 Aug 2008, 09:23
Re: FW sky sports deal question.
No no and thrice NO!
Re: FW sky sports deal question.
emma wrote:As franks signed a contract with sky sports will all his bills be on ppv? surely not.
Not all Franks fights just all of Khan's fights.
Re: FW sky sports deal question.
Gareth wrote:emma wrote:As franks signed a contract with sky sports will all his bills be on ppv? surely not.
Not all Franks fights just all of Khan's fights.
so what will the mcintyre-brook be on?
Re: FW sky sports deal question.
No Idea, possibly on a TVemma wrote:Gareth wrote:emma wrote:As franks signed a contract with sky sports will all his bills be on ppv? surely not.
Not all Franks fights just all of Khan's fights.
so what will the mcintyre-brook be on?
Re: What does this mean for PPV int he future? Every Khan fight?
If any 1 person wants to watch the fight via slingbox,please feel free to contact me [email protected] ![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
-
DG.
- Heavyweight

Re: What does this mean for PPV int he future? Every Khan fight?
Riddick Blowe wrote:you guys are mugs, just watch it on stream. Get the popcorn in, hopefully Khan gets knocked out, then we get to see Frank's expression for free. Everyone wins!
Post it up!