Warren on PPV, Olympic boxers and Calzaghe

fatton
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 267
Joined: 27 Jun 2007, 18:32

Frankly Speaking

Post by fatton »

http://www.allegedly.tv/drill/News/Ar ... aking.html

"If two British boxers had been fighting at the same time in the two rings, there wouldn't have been enough trainers to go round -a ridiculous situation."

Shows how much attention he was paying to the Olympics, at no point was there 2 rings used.
coneye
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8596
Joined: 21 Jun 2004, 06:00

Re: Frankly Speaking

Post by coneye »

fatton wrote:http://www.allegedly.tv/drill/News/Ar ... aking.html

"If two British boxers had been fighting at the same time in the two rings, there wouldn't have been enough trainers to go round -a ridiculous situation."

Shows how much attention he was paying to the Olympics, at no point was there 2 rings used.

He never said THERE WAS two rings used he said IF THERE WAS . But between the lines he is letting Jason know he needs to be guided carefully ala guess who :) :)
DavidPayne
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6248
Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00

Re: Frankly Speaking

Post by DavidPayne »

coneye - you need to read it again.
Wales
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7854
Joined: 23 Mar 2004, 14:05

Re: Frankly Speaking

Post by Wales »

coneye wrote:
He never said THERE WAS two rings used he said IF THERE WAS .
No no he said

"If two British boxers had been fighting at the same time in the two rings, there wouldn't have been enough trainers to go round -a ridiculous situation."
SticknMove
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6000
Joined: 04 Aug 2006, 09:02

Re: Frankly Speaking

Post by SticknMove »

I think this Jason fella needs careful guiding because without his Argonauts his fate will fall into the lap of the Gods. 8) :TU:
DavidPayne
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6248
Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00

Re: Frankly Speaking

Post by DavidPayne »

Oooh, zeuss you sir!
don't call it a comeback
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 332
Joined: 26 Apr 2004, 08:47

Re: Frankly Speaking

Post by don't call it a comeback »

"I can't see the point of him hanging around until London when he could be a professional world champion by then."

Yeh right - more likely to be fighting the World no 170 on a Sky ppv for the WTF intercontintental belt.
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13114
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Frankly Speaking

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

he should pull out all the Cyclops in a Herculean effort, but it may be a case of man against Troy.
DavidPayne
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6248
Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00

Re: Frankly Speaking

Post by DavidPayne »

His lack of power could prove to be his Achilles heel.
steve689
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9661
Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50

Re: Frankly Speaking

Post by steve689 »

Errr...sorry to interrupt :P

allegedly interview in tomorrow's Guardian. I expect Rawling will do it and let's hope he quizzes Frank on the PPV situation.
SticknMove
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6000
Joined: 04 Aug 2006, 09:02

Re: Frankly Speaking

Post by SticknMove »

Yeah it could be Titanic interview - the stuff of legend.

Khan's PPV = 'Golden Fleece'?
fatton
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 267
Joined: 27 Jun 2007, 18:32

Re: Frankly Speaking

Post by fatton »

Yes I'm sure he will be quizzed alright.

So Frank was your idea to put Khan V 2 Jabs on PPV an act of:

a) genius
b) generosity to mankind
c) all of the above

I can see Frank sweating over the tough, searching questions now.
hitman_hatton1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6150
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 20:57

Re: Frankly Speaking

Post by hitman_hatton1 »

steve689 wrote:Errr...sorry to interrupt :P

allegedly allegedly interview in tomorrow's Guardian. I expect Rawling will do it and let's hope he quizzes Frank on the PPV situation.
yeah i remember him saying the same about khan.

where's the world title frank?

he's not even got the wbu for amir. :oops:
mrbassie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1563
Joined: 26 Oct 2003, 00:55

Re: Frankly Speaking

Post by mrbassie »

hitman_hatton1 wrote: where's the world title frank?

he's not even got the wbu for amir. :oops:
Plenty of time for that, after all, you can't go any higher than wbu. He's his whole career yet to reach that pinnacle!

Expect Rawling's questions to Allegedly couldn't get any cheesier if he carved them into GORGON-zola. (best I could do, [sorry])
Old bones Ian
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11806
Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33

Warren on PPV, Olympic boxers and Calzaghe

Post by Old bones Ian »

Poncey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7525
Joined: 21 May 2007, 07:48

Re: Warren on PPV, Olympic boxers and Calzaghe

Post by Poncey »

That might just be the best Warren interview I've ever read. A little one-sided, but very good.
Deserter
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6439
Joined: 04 Sep 2003, 10:01

Re: Warren on PPV, Olympic boxers and Calzaghe

Post by Deserter »

Made interesting reading and the Naz anecdote at the end made for a cracking 'pay-off'. However, it's hard to feel sorry for Frank re. Calzaghe as he wouldn't hesitate to end an association with a boxer if he felt it was a poor relationship from a commercial perspective - I can't recall Frank sustaining a commercial relationship with a boxer who could no longer generate revenue for him purely out of sentiment.
Chambers2
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6499
Joined: 24 Feb 2004, 07:24

Re: Warren on PPV, Olympic boxers and Calzaghe

Post by Chambers2 »

Yeah that's an excellent read!
MightyWarrior
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13311
Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01

Re: Warren on PPV, Olympic boxers and Calzaghe

Post by MightyWarrior »

Yes that's a really excellent interview by McRae, one of the best boxing writers in the biz. Frank actualy comes over well, the Naz bit says a lot.
And it's true you don't really hear a lot of fighters talking about how Frank screwed them over, unlike King and co, and maybe there's a lot of truth to that. He gets a lot of flak on here, but it comes with the territory I guess.

So he was really forced into this Khan PPV gamble by the sounds of it, in order to meet King Khan's purse demands. It was either that, or goodbye Amir. I wonder if he'll hit those figures, and I wonder if there's a clause in the contract, in case Amir gets sparked.
No way his comeback is PPV, if he does get flattened...
Twinkle Toes
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3340
Joined: 22 Sep 2003, 08:38

Re: Warren on PPV, Olympic boxers and Calzaghe

Post by Twinkle Toes »

Mr Warren should do more interviews of this nature, it helps us as fans understand the man and his situations a lot more.

Mind you, Khan on PVP is still a total fleecing.

Where exactly would he have gone if Warren couldn't have matched his demands?

I doubt it would have been to another UK promoter, and the Americans certainly wouldn't match him as safely as Frank has. Can't help but feel it's a little bit of a desperate move by Warren, that we as boxing fans are having to pay for.
Asterix
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7128
Joined: 02 Nov 2007, 10:42

Re: Warren on PPV, Olympic boxers and Calzaghe

Post by Asterix »

Twinkle Toes wrote:Mr Warren should do more interviews of this nature, it helps us as fans understand the man and his situations a lot more.

Mind you, Khan on PVP is still a total fleecing.

Where exactly would he have gone if Warren couldn't have matched his demands?

I doubt it would have been to another UK promoter, and the Americans certainly wouldn't match him as safely as Frank has. Can't help but feel it's a little bit of a desperate move by Warren, that we as boxing fans are having to pay for.
I wouldn't take Warren's word for gospel truth. He's a very wily character and he knows all of what you're saying. :wink:
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27503
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Warren on PPV, Olympic boxers and Calzaghe

Post by stujones »

Anyone spot the contradiction?

Said only Billy Joe was the only member of team GB he spoke to before the games.... but a few paragraphs before said he was speaking to Gavin and telling him to see the Doctor and Coach about his weight issues.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27503
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Warren on PPV, Olympic boxers and Calzaghe

Post by stujones »

Terry D wrote:He meant spoke to about a future contract, no contradiction.
Not how I read it.

On Billy Joe Sanders "He was the only fighter I spoke to before the Games and that was because he approached me."

On Gavin "Frankie Gavin is also a good fighter and he rang me up when he was out there, asking my advice about the weight. I said, 'You've got to go and see the team doctor and [coach] Terry Edwards because you've got a problem.' It's pretty crazy that he couldn't make the weight.

Gavin was out there and out of the Olympics BEFORE the games started. It is pretty clear that this conversation took place before any boxing begun.

Edit: Sorry Terry, can now see your point - although it doesn't say why he spoke to Sanders.
Deserter
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6439
Joined: 04 Sep 2003, 10:01

Re: Warren on PPV, Olympic boxers and Calzaghe

Post by Deserter »

Terry D wrote:He meant spoke to about a future contract, no contradiction.
So a professional promoter was speaking to our leading amateur purely as an altruistic gesture? :lol:
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27503
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Warren on PPV, Olympic boxers and Calzaghe

Post by stujones »

The thing that actual "concerns" me somewhat about the article is what happens if Khan's fight doesn't make the buy rate to make this fight profitable. It sounds like, given the contract that has been signed, that all Khan fights need to be on PPV.

So will that then mean 1) Either rushing Khan into big fights in the hope they will get the figures 2) Getting an "undercard" that will really wet the TV audience appetite but at the same time probably taking longer to organise (and therefore Khan will become increasingly less active).

Even if Khan does a number on the Columbian... the promotion, or lack of it from Sky, could have a massively damaging affect on Khan's future. Although you could save, serve the bugger right for being greedy in the first place.
Post Reply