Heavyweights that would've been successful in lower classes

Post Reply
elmersalsa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15688
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50

Heavyweights that would've been successful in lower classes

Post by elmersalsa »

What heavyweights in your view would have been very successful if they were competing in any weight class under 175lbs?

Like for example, I do not think that guys like the greats Muhammad Ali nor George Foreman, would have been great fighters with that type of skill. At heavyweight they were successful, but it appeared in my mind what if both of them were middleweights or flyweights or they were in any other weight classifications, would they be successful with their skill?

Like if I put Ali or Foreman fighting the great Wilfredo Gomez at 122lbs, (let's say that Ali is 5'6" and 122lbs fighting Gomez) would he win with that style?

Or Ali or Foreman fighting greats like Marvin Hagler, Sugar Ray Robinson, Roberto Duran, Salvador Sanchez, Sugar Ray Leonard, Thomas Hearns, Kid Gavilan or Henry Armstrong, would they beat those guys? (If Ali or Foreman were the same weight and height against these guys)

But in the contrary, I could see the great Mike Tyson being successful fighting in lower weight classes. His style was excellent.

What do you guys think?

What heavyweight of the past or present would have been a great fighter in lower weight classes and what heavyweights would not.
Seamus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 17047
Joined: 31 Jul 2005, 23:38

Re: Heavyweights that would've been successful in lower classes

Post by Seamus »

Good thread Elmer. Usually most topics involving heavyweights have been argued adnauseum.

Here's 3 HW's who would have done very well at 175.

James J Corbett
Tom Sharkey
Bob Pastor
Seamus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 17047
Joined: 31 Jul 2005, 23:38

Re: Heavyweights that would've been successful in lower classes

Post by Seamus »

Tommy Burns could have been a dominant Light Heavyweight.
Robinson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4415
Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 22:34

Re: Heavyweights that would've been successful in lower classes

Post by Robinson »

Id say Tommy Burns would have been better at 160lbs.
Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11173
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Re: Heavyweights that would've been successful in lower classes

Post by Ezzard »

Don't know about a 5'6" Valuev versus a 160 lb Jimmy Wilde but...

Tommy Burns is an interesting fighter. A MW who blew away many HWs. Obviously totally out of his depth with Johnson but also, realistically, totally out of his weight class too. He's overlooked so much he doesn't even make those "underrated" threads.
jimglen
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 987
Joined: 21 Jan 2004, 04:38

Re: Heavyweights that would've been successful in lower classes

Post by jimglen »

two who were not really HW's Don Cockell & Floyd Paterson and of course there must be dozens more.
IKSRTFO
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4758
Joined: 09 Dec 2007, 17:14

Re: Heavyweights that would've been successful in lower classes

Post by IKSRTFO »

James Toney :TU:
metchampion
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 145
Joined: 09 Aug 2008, 16:02

Re: Heavyweights that would've been successful in lower classes

Post by metchampion »

Henry Cooper
dr_devious
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5349
Joined: 29 Dec 2005, 09:19

Re: Heavyweights that would've been successful in lower classes

Post by dr_devious »

Rocky Marciano and Jack Dempsey would have been killers at cruiserweight. I think they would have been world champs at any weight if they were smaller guys, especially Dempsey
elmersalsa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15688
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50

Re: Heavyweights that would've been successful in lower classes

Post by elmersalsa »

I would say that Floyd Patterson from 175lbs down would have been a terrific fighter with that "Peek a boo" style. He had fast hands, move well around the ring, and had excellent technique. He was BLOWN OUT by the heavyweights mainly because guys like Ingemar Johansson, Sonny Liston and Muhammad Ali were WAY BIGGER THAN HE.

Another fighter that I think that would have been a terrific all-time great fighter besides the heavyweight would have been the great Joe Frazier. He applies constant pressure needed in the lower weight classes. His speed was decent and had great infighting skills.

The great Ezzard Charles proved it...He was great in any weight class he was in.

What about the great Jersey Joe Walcott, folks?
observer1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1836
Joined: 27 Nov 2007, 22:30

Re: Heavyweights that would've been successful in lower classes

Post by observer1 »

I guess HWs that were NOT Flat-Footed an danced around in the ring utilising ombos and speed would be succesful in pretty much most divisions, so i agree, Tyson would be Succesful in nearly any division with his technique. Infact he was even P4P no.1 at some point in his Prime.

A Prime Ali would fair pretty well due to his speed and falir.

Foreman? Well he was a slugger relyinh on heavy bombs. Not sure how that would fair in the lower-weight divisions.
Robinson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4415
Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 22:34

Re: Heavyweights that would've been successful in lower classes

Post by Robinson »

People fight the way they do because of the body they are in..
most HWs do what they do because,,,they are big.
Minotauro
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 162
Joined: 25 Apr 2007, 18:52

Re: Heavyweights that would've been successful in lower classes

Post by Minotauro »

I think Patterson would have been one of the greatest light heavys had he stayed there I feel he would have beaten Foster there were a lot of quality fighters at that weight during his time like Johnson, Torres, Moore and Tiger among others.
dr_devious
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5349
Joined: 29 Dec 2005, 09:19

Re: Heavyweights that would've been successful in lower classes

Post by dr_devious »

Foster kayoes Patterson at 175lbs
Martin Sosa Cameron
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1012
Joined: 31 Aug 2005, 19:44

Re: Heavyweights that would've been successful in lower classes

Post by Martin Sosa Cameron »

dr_devious wrote:Rocky Marciano and Jack Dempsey would have been killers at cruiserweight. I think they would have been world champs at any weight if they were smaller guys, especially Dempsey

Yes, especially Rocky. Tunney, too!


:TU:
elmersalsa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15688
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50

Re: Heavyweights that would've been successful in lower classes

Post by elmersalsa »

Styles of Ali and Foreman in lower weight classifications HAS NEVER BEEN SUCCESSFUL. They with that style outside the HWs would have been crushed with horrendous knockouts. :lol: :lol: :lol:
Crease
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16865
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 10:19

Re: Heavyweights that would've been successful in lower classes

Post by Crease »

Marciano.
Dempsey.
Johnson (I think).

They would have been Cruiserweights/KLight Heavyweights...

God help their victims.
dr_devious
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5349
Joined: 29 Dec 2005, 09:19

Re: Heavyweights that would've been successful in lower classes

Post by dr_devious »

Jack Johnson had the defense and all round skills to have been highly successful in other divisions had he been smaller. Ditto Jersey Joe Walcott
Seamus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 17047
Joined: 31 Jul 2005, 23:38

Re: Heavyweights that would've been successful in lower classes

Post by Seamus »

Elmer initially asked what Heavyweights would have done well at 175, not Cruiserweight. Most of the guys named, Foreman, Ali, Dempsey, Walcott, Johnson etc would have been so weight drained at 175 that they would have gotten beaten by journeymen.

I think basically any good fighter who weighed 185 or less would have a decent shot at being a good LHW.
Minotauro
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 162
Joined: 25 Apr 2007, 18:52

Re: Heavyweights that would've been successful in lower classes

Post by Minotauro »

dr_devious wrote:Foster kayoes Patterson at 175lbs
No way, who did Foster beat that was as good, quick and powerful as Patterson? Nobody every time he went to heavy he got beat bad the only people to knock Patterson out were Johansson and Liston who both hit much harder then Foster. Foster was ko'd by Doug Jones and probably wouldn't have been a dominant if Mauro Mina had stuck around and not retired early due to injuries.
Post Reply