DG. wrote:banjo wrote:DG. wrote:
You stole that from me
Moi? Thief?

DG. wrote:banjo wrote:DG. wrote:
You stole that from me
Moi? Thief?

[/quote]DG. wrote:
What's that? you have taken the day off to do what?
banjo wrote:DG. wrote:
What's that? you have taken the day off to do what?
shes working i'm off for a fortnightDG. wrote:banjo wrote:DG. wrote:
What's that? you have taken the day off to do what?
And that as well? Mrs Banjo will be pleased!
Ouch.Tykemania wrote: Oh, I came up with plenty of better insults - they would all have been wasted on you though.
BUT..One on one I would put Witter to beat hatton because Hatton only needs to get hit ONCE to put him in trouble and Junior is a good finisher.Terry D wrote:You have gone mad. Nothing on Witter's recent records suggests he was edging Hatton P4P wise, nor in danger of setting pulses alight off his own back.DG. wrote:Diddly Diddly Diddly.
You have fallen for it! 'Hatton lost to PBF' in a win win fight - if he lost he was supposed to and if he won..whoopee!
![]()
Witters career is wasting away...BUT if he fought Hatton he would beat him, hence me putting him above Hatton.
Witter should never have lost to BBT ( Bradley Big Teeth) - great shame he did.
![]()
Forget the rubber wallpaper - send me a cheque for £1M!
Man for man Hatton has fought better men recently. Harris can only cover so much of the drift that has been Witter's recent career.
Say what you like about Hatton but there is no way a guy who throws 5 punches every 3 rounds will have beaten him.
We both joked about how poor Bradley is over PM, you know Witter lost to a novice, Hatton saved him a loss, if not a payday.
It puts your claims that Manny only made his name due to migration from the South, former slaves, to Detroit into perspective. Have you been sniffing Lemsip again? Manny helps Holyfield develop a win over Bowe, gives McCall the Lewis plan, and makes Wlad look less shit, well less chinny, and he is not a great trainer.
DG brings the news, and no one understands it![]()
Are you as daft as DG ??? Calzaghe top Hatton 2nd till Haye proves himself at heavyweight ???emma wrote:Calzaghe
Haye
Witter
Hatton
Froch
Woods
Moore
Cook
Khan
Rhodes.
Stop writing bollocks then you FOOLDG. wrote:Great Idea to put Mark Thompson on ignore - I bet his post is slagging me off?
Actually I think he is a stalker?
Yes - he is a Stalker!
Check out the subtle reference to Mark Thompsons... alternative lifestyle.
U know what Pink Floyd would say.....
Now Mark Thompson - leave DGs and his posts alone!
Twit!
Top 5? Probably nobody. Unless he was in your Top 5 of course, then it would be one.mark thompson wrote:1) Calzaghe
2) Hatton
3) Haye
4) Froch
5) Woods
6) Witter
7) Cook
8) Maccarinelli
9) Skelton
10) Mitchell / Munroe
P.S. how many people would have had Khan in there top 10 the other week, probably even there top 5 ????
johnswan1 wrote:Top 5? Probably nobody. Unless he was in your Top 5 of course, then it would be one.mark thompson wrote:1) Calzaghe
2) Hatton
3) Haye
4) Froch
5) Woods
6) Witter
7) Cook
8) Maccarinelli
9) Skelton
10) Mitchell / Munroe
P.S. how many people would have had Khan in there top 10 the other week, probably even there top 5 ????
of couse not. My list was tongue in cheek.mark thompson wrote:Are you as daft as DG ??? Calzaghe top Hatton 2nd till Haye proves himself at heavyweight ???emma wrote:Calzaghe
Haye
Witter
Hatton
Froch
Woods
Moore
Cook
Khan
Rhodes.
emma wrote:of couse not. My list was tongue in cheek.mark thompson wrote:Are you as daft as DG ??? Calzaghe top Hatton 2nd till Haye proves himself at heavyweight ???emma wrote:Calzaghe
Haye
Witter
Hatton
Froch
Woods
Moore
Cook
Khan
Rhodes.
emma wrote:of couse not. My list was tongue in cheek.mark thompson wrote:
Are you as daft as DG ??? Calzaghe top Hatton 2nd till Haye proves himself at heavyweight ???
At first I thought he might be the boxer mark thompson.DG wrote:Emma - ignore Mark Thompson - at least he won't hit on you, he likes men.
I maintain that my list is the best.Khaosai-Galaxy wrote:Horse, where are you??
emma wrote:emma wrote:of couse not. My list was tongue in cheek.mark thompson wrote:
Are you as daft as DG ??? Calzaghe top Hatton 2nd till Haye proves himself at heavyweight ???At first I thought he might be the boxer mark thompson.DG wrote:Emma - ignore Mark Thompson - at least he won't hit on you, he likes men.
DG. wrote:No - not the boxer, but I have heard this guy likes to get bashed around the ring...piece!

states wrote:It's good to see that Junior Witter is still the greatest fighter to never actually prove his greatness.
eff me, I thought there would be a drop off after Bradley beat him, but apparently not.
Junior Witter's greatest achievement is that Ricky Hatton wouldn't fight him. Wow.
DG. wrote:johnswan1 wrote:Top 5? Probably nobody. Unless he was in your Top 5 of course, then it would be one.mark thompson wrote:1) Calzaghe
2) Hatton
3) Haye
4) Froch
5) Woods
6) Witter
7) Cook
8) Maccarinelli
9) Skelton
10) Mitchell / Munroe
P.S. how many people would have had Khan in there top 10 the other week, probably even there top 5 ????
He would have Khan at number1 - he only knows 6 other fighters - Tyson - Ali - Bruno - Eubank - Benn and Naz
He also thinks they are still active.
The ediot!
MMMM think not i had Khan no where near my top ten, and i know 7 other fighters actually![]()
![]()
![]()