Greetings!
I think what you've post in top boxers pound for pound has no enough bases, because we all know that Manny Pacquiao is the no.1 pound for pound today,as stated in many references that I had. I am one of the great fan of your site, but for this result that I saw I fell there's a bias over what you have posted to,If you have any reference to prove that this, kindly show to all boxing fanatic. But I can show you all that what your posted is absolutely false.
cris_noverence wrote:Greetings!
I think what you've post in top boxers pound for pound has no enough bases, because we all know that Manny Pacquiao is the no.1 pound for pound today,as stated in many references that I had. I am one of the great fan of your site, but for this result that I saw I fell there's a bias over what you have posted to,If you have any reference to prove that this, kindly show to all boxing fanatic. But I can show you all that what your posted is absolutely false.
My guess is you're Filipino. That said, since when is there an official pound-4-pound ranking? There is none - most are based solely on opinion, unlike BoxRec's. I don't dispute the fact the guy MAY BE the P4P top dog but your opinion is your opinion and that's NOT false. I suggest you read the above link...
I reckon the problem is, John's computer is biased. Perhaps we should threaten to melt its motherboard unless it learns to add up the numbers in a way which makes us all happy?
shit, I hadn't thought of that, the CPU was made in the USA, perhaps that is people are always emailing that the ratings are US biased 