lirva33 wrote:I'll make 142 when I put 1000 on Jones.
Seriously though, If Jones loses this, I'll go crazy.
At those odds, you'd be far better putting 100 on Tarver to win. Much less downside potential (though a higher downside probability) than your bet above, and if you win, you win far more than 142 quid.
IMHO, the only way to make money over the long-term in sports betting is to bet very carefully, on underdogs who are likely vastly underrated. It's like looking for undervalued stocks in the markets. But both require you to have deep knowledge of the game, and to do your homework (I know, those are ugly words there.)
A good example was the Hopkins/Trinidad fight. Anyone who'd followed Hopkins' career should've known that there was no way he should've been worse than even money, but in that case Trinidad's popularity greatly skewed the odds. But obvious (at least to the hardcore fan) examples like that don't come along all that often, and having the patience to wait for them is not a common trait in sports bettors, many of whom are gambling addicts and need a regular fix.