Warren's brief responds to boxingtalk.net

Post Reply
bennie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15244
Joined: 15 Nov 2002, 09:53

Warren's brief responds to boxingtalk.net

Post by bennie »

Check it out on boxingtalk.net.
Eric the Viking
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1354
Joined: 03 Apr 2003, 21:40

Post by Eric the Viking »

So show us the paperwork, Heathie-boy. Let's see how much Guzman was getting paid, and whether Sky fulfilled any obligations it may have had under the promotional agreement. It's very easy for a promoter to sign a fighter for X number of fights, then do f***-all to make said fights (which it is the promoter's job to do, BTW). Is the contract completely based on number of fights (which would in effect constitute indentured servitude in that the fighter has no escape clause), or is there also a time limit?
Steven Heath wrote:It is clear that negotiations conducted by Sports Network?s Andy Ayling and Olga Brooks, who speaks Spanish, did go on into the early hours of the morning, however, that was as a result of the negotiations stance being taken by Rafael Guerreo [sic] on behalf of the boxer. This meeting was a continuous meeting and there was no question of Joan Guzman being awoken to sign the agreement.
If Olga Brooks works for Sky, what proof do we have (other than her word) that she fairly represented the details of the contract to Guzman and his representatives? Was the contract strictly in English, or also translated into Spanish? At what time did Guzman sign the agreement, and was he fully aware of his rights?

With regard to the allegations involving WBO president Valcarel, it's called "deniability." Unless and until we hear from the other people that were there (and I don't mean just Mr. Valcarcel,) it's a he-said-she-said.
MightyWarrior
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13266
Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01

Post by MightyWarrior »

Doesn't mention Andy and his Cartier watch though?
adamiw
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1418
Joined: 30 Aug 2003, 17:08

Post by adamiw »

if the contracts are there, signed, all done correctly Guzman cant have too many complaints.
Eric the Viking
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1354
Joined: 03 Apr 2003, 21:40

Post by Eric the Viking »

adamiw wrote:if the contracts are there, signed, all done correctly Guzman cant have too many complaints.
Assuming there was no pressure from WBO president Valcarel to "sign with Warren or else," and that he was well-informed as to what was in the contract when he signed it, and fully aware of his right to not sign anything until he had a chance to have a qualified person representing *him* examine it to their satisfaction - those are precisely the things at the heart of the matter, and for which we have only the conflicting words of Guzman's manager and Warren's counsel.
knockout artist
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1482
Joined: 03 Sep 2003, 13:18

Post by knockout artist »

Eric the Viking wrote:So show us the paperwork, Heathie-boy. Let's see how much Guzman was getting paid, and whether Sky fulfilled any obligations it may have had under the promotional agreement. It's very easy for a promoter to sign a fighter for X number of fights, then do f***-all to make said fights (which it is the promoter's job to do, BTW). Is the contract completely based on number of fights (which would in effect constitute indentured servitude in that the fighter has no escape clause), or is there also a time limit?
Steven Heath wrote:It is clear that negotiations conducted by Sports Network?s Andy Ayling and Olga Brooks, who speaks Spanish, did go on into the early hours of the morning, however, that was as a result of the negotiations stance being taken by Rafael Guerreo [sic] on behalf of the boxer. This meeting was a continuous meeting and there was no question of Joan Guzman being awoken to sign the agreement.
If Olga Brooks works for Sky, what proof do we have (other than her word) that she fairly represented the details of the contract to Guzman and his representatives? Was the contract strictly in English, or also translated into Spanish? At what time did Guzman sign the agreement, and was he fully aware of his rights?

With regard to the allegations involving WBO president Valcarel, it's called "deniability." Unless and until we hear from the other people that were there (and I don't mean just Mr. Valcarcel,) it's a he-said-she-said.
Olga Brookes is not independent. Their is a clear conflict of interest.
theguru
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 296
Joined: 17 Feb 2004, 15:50

Post by theguru »

Getting fighters to sign contracts under pressure is one of SN specialities.

When Robin Reid fought Branco Andy Ayling was trying to get branco to sign a contract 10 mins before he fought ,Branc refused thats why there was about a 10 min delay.
bennie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15244
Joined: 15 Nov 2002, 09:53

Post by bennie »

theguru wrote:Getting fighters to sign contracts under pressure is one of SN specialities.

When Robin Reid fought Branco Andy Ayling was trying to get branco to sign a contract 10 mins before he fought ,Branc refused thats why there was about a 10 min delay.
Shame Branco didn't walk out and spare us 12 of the horriblest rounds you'll ever see. :wink:
REAL_DEAL
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5027
Joined: 09 Jul 2003, 06:42

Post by REAL_DEAL »

why didnt this go into the FW forum?
Eric the Viking
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1354
Joined: 03 Apr 2003, 21:40

Post by Eric the Viking »

REAL_DEAL wrote:why didnt this go into the FW forum?
Nothing clearly libelous, apparently. Good thing, too, because as far as I can tell the FW "forum" is simply a graveyard for posts that might be construed as libelous of FW. Does any non-moderator here actually have access to the FW forum?
Post Reply