Your probably right but thats just a mythical match up isn't ?Captain Hook wrote:Possibly, but if we're talking prime Joe v prime RJJ I'd go for Jones by wide points victory. He was just sublime.mark thompson wrote:good post captain and RJJ most probably would have beaten JC 10 years ago thats coz RJJ was in his prime then, but Calzaghe wasn't 10 years ago, he has shone in the last 4 years or so, so it's an unfair comparison that people make saying prime for prime because when the likes of RJJ, Bhop and Trinidad and whoever else were in their prime Calzaghe was not, Calzaghe beat a prime Lacy, and Kessler and would have done the same to Pavlik easily had Bhop not done it already .
Calzaghe-Hopkins 2 has to happen now.
-
mark thompson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 662
- Joined: 05 Sep 2008, 05:13
Re: Calzaghe-Hopkins 2 has to happen now.
-
Captain Hook
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4730
- Joined: 07 May 2007, 09:40
Re: Calzaghe-Hopkins 2 has to happen now.
No, I have a Tardis...mark thompson wrote:Your probably right but thats just a mythical match up isn't ?Captain Hook wrote:Possibly, but if we're talking prime Joe v prime RJJ I'd go for Jones by wide points victory. He was just sublime.mark thompson wrote:good post captain and RJJ most probably would have beaten JC 10 years ago thats coz RJJ was in his prime then, but Calzaghe wasn't 10 years ago, he has shone in the last 4 years or so, so it's an unfair comparison that people make saying prime for prime because when the likes of RJJ, Bhop and Trinidad and whoever else were in their prime Calzaghe was not, Calzaghe beat a prime Lacy, and Kessler and would have done the same to Pavlik easily had Bhop not done it already .
-
mark thompson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 662
- Joined: 05 Sep 2008, 05:13
Re: Calzaghe-Hopkins 2 has to happen now.
can i borrow it ? 