Elcock v Macklin

Post Reply
My Name Is Earl
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 634
Joined: 07 Nov 2008, 06:05

Elcock v Macklin

Post by My Name Is Earl »

The fight is on for next March. A Brummie ding-dong which won't disappoint.
Chambers2
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6499
Joined: 24 Feb 2004, 07:24

Re: Elcock v Macklin

Post by Chambers2 »

Cheers Earl :TU:

It'll be a cracker, it's a 50-50 in my eyes.

Don't suppose you know what's going on with Darren McDermott and his 2 foot cut?
Dioufy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7351
Joined: 16 Sep 2006, 23:09

Re: Elcock v Macklin

Post by Dioufy »

And why has McDermott been removed from mandatory and Macklin put in? If he has been at all.

I can only guess that the cut hasn't healed?
Mario
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 358
Joined: 09 Oct 2006, 05:57

Re: Elcock v Macklin

Post by Mario »

McDermott's now up against Darren Barker in an eliminator which would be a cracker but i can't see it coming off to be honest. I can only assume that when he fought Elcock it was a voluntary defence, if not he should surely be nominated for a rematch now. Someone can correct me if i'm wrong.
Dioufy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7351
Joined: 16 Sep 2006, 23:09

Re: Elcock v Macklin

Post by Dioufy »

He was mandatory I think. I'm not sure about this but didn't he fight Darren Rhodes in an eliminator in 2007?
Post Reply