The Haye v Barrett Thread (MERGED)

Wax On
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 314
Joined: 18 Dec 2007, 08:32

Re: MONTE BARRETT AT 66/1 IN THE FIRST 4 ROUNDS!

Post by Wax On »

GLOBALBOX wrote:66/1 all gone now I think and it was big although I don't necessarily agree its Haye's chin thats the problem but in fact temple shots that do him in, see Mock and Mormeck fights if memory serves.

Thompson caught him flush on the chin a good few times and he was more exhausted than hurt I felt, although many won't agree.

Anyways it can't go far surely either way and have taken the under four and a half rounds bet with Ladbrokes at Evens for a good few bob.

Fingers crossed its Haye and not Barrett who does the deed if I am to collect
Thanks for pointing out the under four and a half odds Global, I've had £50 on that. Plus a few quid on 1st round Haye and a quid on 1,2,3,4 Barrett. Hoping I've got my bases covered and they come out swinging!! :box:
MightyWarrior
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13283
Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01

Re: David Haye vs. Monte Barrett

Post by MightyWarrior »

Have to go with Haye by KO2.
I'm assuming he doesn't make any mistakes, but he's so confident, I wouldn't be surprised to see him take his time. That could spell trouble, as I reckon Barrett could make him pay with just one punch. Rounds 4-6 are a good bet if Barrett survives the early going. Odds on those rounds have halved since last night.

Wonder if they had to pay Vitali to attend...I bet they paid for a firstclass ticket for the big man.
My T Sharp
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1933
Joined: 16 May 2004, 13:32

Re: David Haye vs. Monte Barrett

Post by My T Sharp »

MightyWarrior wrote:Have to go with Haye by KO2.
I'm assuming he doesn't make any mistakes, but he's so confident, I wouldn't be surprised to see him take his time. That could spell trouble, as I reckon Barrett could make him pay with just one punch. Rounds 4-6 are a good bet if Barrett survives the early going. Odds on those rounds have halved since last night.

Wonder if they had to pay Vitali to attend...I bet they paid for a firstclass ticket for the big man.
Haye TKO 3

They might have paid Vitali, but it sounds like he is keen on promoting a big fight with Haye in Germany next year.
MightyWarrior
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13283
Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01

Re: David Haye vs. Monte Barrett

Post by MightyWarrior »

My T Sharp wrote: Haye TKO 3

They might have paid Vitali, but it sounds like he is keen on promoting a big fight with Haye in Germany next year.
He must be, I heard Wlad was gonna be ringside too, no sign though. Shame they didn't stick Taylor/Lacy on the undercard.
My T Sharp
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1933
Joined: 16 May 2004, 13:32

Re: David Haye vs. Monte Barrett

Post by My T Sharp »

Too right, Setanta have missed a good card there, got to be better than Couture Vs Lesnar :box:
mcriss
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 17
Joined: 30 May 2006, 18:34

Re: Haye fight (what time and stream)

Post by mcriss »

somebody pm me...thanks.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22334
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Haye undercard - What have I missed?

Post by Horse »

What fights have they shown so far? As I have only just started watching it.
My T Sharp
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1933
Joined: 16 May 2004, 13:32

Re: Haye undercard - What have I missed?

Post by My T Sharp »

Cracking fight between Grant and Reid.

Grant was down in the fourth but won on points.

Beforehand Vitali got interviewed and he hinted that one of the Klits could face Haye next year in Germany :TU:
emma
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1421
Joined: 20 Mar 2006, 12:28

Re: Haye undercard - What have I missed?

Post by emma »

what time does ryan fight?
My T Sharp
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1933
Joined: 16 May 2004, 13:32

Re: Haye undercard - What have I missed?

Post by My T Sharp »

About ten minutes I think...hopefully after the X Factor sing off :oops:
emma
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1421
Joined: 20 Mar 2006, 12:28

Re: Haye undercard - What have I missed?

Post by emma »

Do us a RBR plz.
emma
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1421
Joined: 20 Mar 2006, 12:28

Re: David Haye vs. Monte Barrett

Post by emma »

Grilling Machine wrote:Too early for that, Teddy. Streams which go live an hour before often don't make it.

Waylon: I agree about Monte's plan. He'll be hoping to come through the early rounds, because his natural strength can wear Haye down. If he's there after four it gets very interesting. Thompson and Mormeck have shown what 'old men' can do.

However, I think David will catch him in the first two, so that's what I clicked on above. DH in less than five minutes. How do the BoxRec wives and girlfriends have it? ;;-)
Im saying haye to win in the first 5 rounds.
Abbo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 699
Joined: 02 Jun 2005, 16:36

Re: David Haye vs. Monte Barrett

Post by Abbo »

I dont think Haye will be a big hitter at heavyweight I think he will look to hit and move 120-108 for me.
Scrap
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1604
Joined: 29 May 2006, 05:24

Re: Haye undercard - What have I missed?

Post by Scrap »

I thought Ryan looked Terriffic, great composure and concentration Boxed well.
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13114
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: The Haye v Barrett Thread (MERGED)

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

Riddick Blowe wrote:I thought that too, but let's face it, Barrett isn't going to be coming out with a high volume of dangerous fire, he's going to sit back for the first couple of rounds or so and that suits Haye. Haye is going to get his shots off first in this one, I'm pretty sure of it, but the question is whether Monte will have the heart to stick around once he tastes Haye's power. I think he will... but Haye will land a LOT and force a stoppage around round 5, that's my prediction. Now I have to find a way to watch it...
:TU:
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Haye/Barrett - Timings - Press Conference - Weigh In - Fight

Post by DG. »

black panther wrote:The winner, and NEW BOXREC WEIGHT GUESSING CHAMPION OF THE WOOOORRRLDDD..............

DG!!


Well I was way off but I'm pleasantly surprised. Really refreshing to see a heavyweight in shape and in particular the fact that Haye's realised he doesn't need to put on a hugh amount of weight to be effective.
Call me King!

:D

Haye is going the Holyfield Route, what else could he weigh in at!

215!


Haye/Holyfield.

Its the ideal weight!

First Hamilton, then Obama - NOW DG!

:D
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Haye/Barrett - Timings - Press Conference - Weigh In - Fight

Post by DG. »

Spud wrote:
black panther wrote:The winner, and NEW BOXREC WEIGHT GUESSING CHAMPION OF THE WOOOORRRLDDD..............

DG!!


Well I was way off but I'm pleasantly surprised. Really refreshing to see a heavyweight in shape and in particular the fact that Haye's realised he doesn't need to put on a hugh amount of weight to be effective.
give him f*ck all credit - I told him and anyone else who would listen that Haye would weigh in at around 215-220 - ffs don't applaude DG :lol: :lol: he will make out he is an expert - mind you I think he is right about Malanaggi beating Hatton as well - so maybe he is a boxing expert!!!


HELLO DG :TU: ;;-) :TU:

Spud.

I am the KING!

:lol:


:D
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: The Haye v Barrett Thread (MERGED)

Post by leforge »

Haye good but not great DG sorry, Cliff Couser stopped barrett!
Chambers2
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6499
Joined: 24 Feb 2004, 07:24

Re: The Haye v Barrett Thread (MERGED)

Post by Chambers2 »

Holy shit! Mother of God! David Haye is the Dogs Bollox. Monte Barrett's one of the quicker Heavies and he looked pedestrian in comparison, a BIG lumbering heavy of the ilk of Sam Peter would just get teed off on. Dare I say he's got Tyson like power, yes I think I will, "David Haye has got Tyson like power", he's definately going to have to conquer BIGGER chins than Montes along his way to Greatness, but the early signs are looking damned good!!

Bring on the Klitschko's, they'll both end up going the same way as Monte!

Had £150 nicker on Haye to win by KO at 4/6 with my good friends at http://www.SportingBet.com , which makes Hayes performance all the sweeter

:bow: :bow:

and before someone starts, I'm not getting carried away at all :TU:
bennie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15244
Joined: 15 Nov 2002, 09:53

Re: The Haye v Barrett Thread (MERGED)

Post by bennie »

The world is David Haye's oyster following his typically swashbuckling debut at heavyweight on Saturday night in London.
The 28-year-old Haye, still a baby by heavweight standards and a 'real' fighter in a division devoid of fire, excitement and talent, and who looks like a fighter, too, muscles rippling and hands flashing, picked apart grizzled old American Monte Barrett in five liberating rounds at the 02 Arena right by the River Thames, dunking him five times before it was stopped, a man who came in with the tag of division gatekeeper but was made to look like a goalkeeper.
Barrett was made to look fat.
Harsh words, but I am pig sick of the Monte Barretts of this world parading as leading heavyweight contenders by virtue of their ability to disappoint. The heavyweight division is in trouble - it has been for years - and Barrett and his blubbery cronies and Don King are to blame. Make way for some younger blood, for some charisma, free from the reins of King and his American puddings and ghastly Eastern European robots. If David Haye is not quite Mike Tyson in 1986 he is Evander Holyfield in 1988, a former undisputed cruiserweight champion who has moved up, who can fight, who wants to fight and who trains like he wants to fight.
Next up for him could be Vitali Klitschko, the giant Ukrainian who strolled out of a retirement of four years in October, without so much as a warm-up, and pasted Samuel Peter for the WBC heavyweight title, which sums up how much the heavyweight division needs Haye. Peter is a fat, stumpy African who goes by the nickname of "The Nigerian Nightmare". A more literal nickname has never been read. Klitschko, too, is one of those 'robots' I mentioned, colourless and glum, but he is the most efficient robot out there, along with his younger brother Wladimir. If I were Haye, even this soon into his heavyweight adventure, I would jump at the chance to lick the Klits.
Haye is quick, lightning quick, and he whacks with it. Vitali is slow. God! He makes arthritis sufferers look speedy, though he knows how to use his great height and reach at distance. Wlad is less of a fighter but the prettier of the two and looks have got him an awful long way, it seems. He does hit reasonably hard.
What I am doing here! Breaking down the strengths and weaknesses of humanoids. Give me that colour again. The Hayemaker. The future.
Last edited by bennie on 16 Nov 2008, 07:30, edited 1 time in total.
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: The Haye v Barrett Thread (MERGED)

Post by DG. »

leforge wrote:Haye good but not great DG sorry, Cliff Couser stopped barrett!

I never said he was great - but he did a good job last night!

Will need to be less reckless against Wlad, but he will beat WLAD!

Vitali is a very difficult fight for Haye.

I give Haye a B for lat night.


:D


:TU:
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: The Haye v Barrett Thread (MERGED)

Post by Autobarn »

Certainly was spectacular, fast knockdown punches coming from out of the blue, Barrett down 5 times.

Good to see Haye come in light, fighting for speed. Barrett didn't look too bad and Haye got him out of there.

There were some minuses, such as staying on the ropes too long, throwing wild shots, no looking physically strong on the inside. Must have been a lot of pressure, promoting & headlining, but ultimately he did the job in style.

My thing is, I think Haye will iron out flaws, as he takes on different fighters and styles. I have to question the wisdom of fighting Vitali next year, though. I mean, is he world class enough already to go into these top level fights (gven that he's a former world champ)? Or does he need to do it Evander style, 5 or 6 fights, vs shot names and dangerous contenders?

The Klitschko bros won't be around forever. I see Wlad losing next spring to Povetkin, Vitali has been injury plagued. Maybe Haye feels he has the solution for tall, methodical "fencing" styles having put away the 6'4 Macca and the 6'6 Gurov?

Vitali - the better of the 2 bros - must be rubbing his hands together. His next 2 fights could be against former crusierweight champs. So while the class level may be close, the size and strength difference will be very pronounced.
Spiker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 591
Joined: 15 Mar 2008, 14:24

Re: The Haye v Barrett Thread (MERGED)

Post by Spiker »

I liked Hayes speed and power like the rest of you it was a good fight.

where was his working off the jab and finishing him in a calculated fasion?
where was his guard as he was putting it together?

He looked fast and explosive as he was swinging wildly but that is not good enough against someone like Klit.

Very exciting but he aint no Lennox lewes hes just to wild and his lights are going to be put out all of a sudden.

Great fight though and nice to have a heavy to shout about for a change Fast, explosive but also flawed 8)
Phenomenal-Nutrition
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5185
Joined: 10 Feb 2005, 14:53

Re: The Haye v Barrett Thread (MERGED)

Post by Phenomenal-Nutrition »

Obviously he looked good BUT he was easy to hit with his hands down especially with the jab but open to all shots really and he was put down hard. His punches are also quite very wide. He could get away with all this against a slower 37yo Barrett, against a quicker taller rangier Wlad he will get picked apart from range and eat something big. Vitali I just see him beating because of age

Oh and he has got HW power, but hes not that devastating at the weight
Dioufy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7351
Joined: 16 Sep 2006, 23:09

Re: The Haye v Barrett Thread (MERGED)

Post by Dioufy »

I think he will be devastating at the weight - he caught Monte with clubbing shots on the back/side of the head last night and he still went over. Imagine if David landed a sweet right on his chin - I think he could've been hurt bad.
Post Reply