Ricky Hatton's Cliches
Re: Ricky Hatton's Cliches
why does he have to speak in third person all the time????????????? because adamj1987 belives that is annoying
Re: Ricky Hatton's Cliches
Hmmm interesting point and one I hadn't considered.sg1985 wrote:you wouldnt feel like that if he hadnt lost, you'll say thats not the case but it isGoz wrote:I'm getting pretty bored of him now I must be honest.
I've gone in a year from someone who was looking to go to Vegas to watch him fight Mayweather (and would have had the ticket prices not been scandalous) to not even bothering to buy the PPV tomorrow because I don't feel PPV is justified for this.
And Sky are getting on my tits with their crappy cliched coverage of the build up too.
I guess Hatton losing has had an impact on how I feel and if Hatton was fighting Paulie Malliwhathisface on Saturday still unbeaten with a win over Mayweather on his ledger it would kind of make it more interesting to me.
But that's the point. He did lose and has done nothing since then so in my opinion hasn't beaten a top top fighter since 2005.
So this fight is not worth PPV to Goz and to me now Ricky seems to be trading more on 'my amazing fans' than his ability as top possible p4p rated fighter.
Re: Ricky Hatton's Cliches
I think you're getting away from the point of the thread dude. The Hatton circus is boring people a bit, myself included.sg1985 wrote:
am i wrong but isnt mallignagi considered the second best super lightweight after hatton?
this is a big fight, not the biggest ever at the weight like someone said in another thread but it is interesting. i dont think hatton should fight dlh, i would be much more interested in seeing him face pacquiao or juan manuel marquez or even cotto. if hatton can win and hasnt lost it like alot of people think (i dont) there is some really good fights left for him in the next year or two before he retires
Maybe Saturdays fight will go some way to putting him back on the map as a real fighter - I'll be downloading the next day to find out!
-
Khaosai-Galaxy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2739
- Joined: 29 Apr 2007, 12:15
Re: Ricky Hatton's Cliches
sg1985 wrote:Hmmm interesting point and one I hadn't considered.Goz wrote:you wouldnt feel like that if he hadnt lost, you'll say thats not the case but it issg1985 wrote:I'm getting pretty bored of him now I must be honest.
I've gone in a year from someone who was looking to go to Vegas to watch him fight Mayweather (and would have had the ticket prices not been scandalous) to not even bothering to buy the PPV tomorrow because I don't feel PPV is justified for this.
And Sky are getting on my tits with their crappy cliched coverage of the build up too.
I guess Hatton losing has had an impact on how I feel and if Hatton was fighting Paulie Malliwhathisface on Saturday still unbeaten with a win over Mayweather on his ledger it would kind of make it more interesting to me.
But that's the point. He did lose and has done nothing since then so in my opinion hasn't beaten a top top fighter since 2005.
So this fight is not worth PPV to Goz and to me now Ricky seems to be trading more on 'my amazing fans' than his ability as top possible p4p rated fighter.
am i wrong but isnt mallignagi considered the second best super lightweight after hatton?
this is a big fight, not the biggest ever at the weight like someone said in another thread but it is interesting. i dont think hatton should fight dlh, i would be much more interested in seeing him face pacquiao or juan manuel marquez or even cotto. if hatton can win and hasnt lost it like alot of people think (i dont) there is some really good fights left for him in the next year or two before he retires
Well quite, its a very competetive fight between 2 top 5 140 pounders, sadly the old women brigade arent interested in this fight because they dont like Hatton's personality or his voice, or because he repeats himself in interviews or fornicate knows what....
Interesting to note its the same whinging old women who weren't interested in Calzaghe - Jones because it wasnt a "competetive matchup"...
Re: Ricky Hatton's Cliches
Interesting that Bradley wants to fight Hatton. Shame it can't be a (whisper it) unifier.
Re: Ricky Hatton's Cliches
Absolutely - Khan was the biggest rip off in the history of televised sport in the UK in my opinion.sg1985 wrote:
you said:
"So this fight is not worth PPV to Goz and to me now Ricky seems to be trading more on 'my amazing fans' than his ability as top possible p4p rated fighter."
and i was making the point the fight is a genuine ppv fight. well compared to some ppv fights that have been on recently (amir khan) come on
I think the £50+ a month I already give Sky should get me this fight though. That's my prerogative - it's not worth £15 to me.
I understand why I might need to stump up when they are putting together a mega-fight like the PBF one but not this, not for me.
The Lazcano PPV was worse though, at least as you say this is between the 2 arguably best Light Welters out there.
Re: Ricky Hatton's Cliches
Can't pirate on Virgin bband ![[icon_shame.gif] :shame:](./images/smilies/icon_shame.gif)
Re: Ricky Hatton's Cliches
Would love to but I don't live in a Virgin cabled area. Sky is the only option.sg1985 wrote:
you pay fifty quid a month? you should change to virgin i get phone, internet, tele with sky sports 1,2,3 & movies for £38 a month, setanta is free to cos of the deal i got
With Setanta I pay over £60 a month.
Re: Ricky Hatton's Cliches
What makes a fight qualify for PPV?
An example is DLH-Mayweather which we recieved on normal sky, yet we had to pay £15 for Mayweather-Hatton. Alright I know DLH was past it and would have sparked the loudmouth 10 years ago but surely DLH-Mayweather is a bigger fight.
An example is DLH-Mayweather which we recieved on normal sky, yet we had to pay £15 for Mayweather-Hatton. Alright I know DLH was past it and would have sparked the loudmouth 10 years ago but surely DLH-Mayweather is a bigger fight.
Re: Ricky Hatton's Cliches
Whilst I accept the fight is decent - there is something 'plastic' about it to me as well.Khaosai-Galaxy wrote:
Well quite, its a very competetive fight between 2 top 5 140 pounders, sadly the old women brigade arent interested in this fight because they dont like Hatton's personality or his voice, or because he repeats himself in interviews or eff knows what....
Interesting to note its the same whinging old women who weren't interested in Calzaghe - Jones because it wasnt a "competetive matchup"...
Sky showing that 'magic man' documentary ad nauseum, Mayweather Senior's crappy poems on SSN all day and also I don't really think Malliwhatshisface's record stands up to much scrutiny either - it's basically a brave defeat to Cotto and some contentious decisions over adverseries that Hatton would be criticised for fighting. And that's about it.
It's a turn off for me.
-
DG.
- Heavyweight

Re: Ricky Hatton's Cliches
Khaosai-Galaxy wrote:Abbo wrote:Honestly Galaxy, you know exactly the point being made. Hatton blatantly milks this character as he believes it sells.
Hatton - Lazcano, 55,000 tickets sold, biggest ticket seller in world boxing
It does sell
And how many do you think are on the BNP list? I hear he has a lot of racists following him, any truth?
-
DG.
- Heavyweight

Re: Ricky Hatton's Cliches
Adamj1987 wrote:why does he have to speak in third person all the time????????????? because adamj1987 belives that is annoying
DG thinks the same and you would never catch DG doing that.
-
DG.
- Heavyweight

Re: Ricky Hatton's Cliches
I am going to call SKY and emand this fight for free or I cancel!Goz wrote:Absolutely - Khan was the biggest rip off in the history of televised sport in the UK in my opinion.sg1985 wrote:
you said:
"So this fight is not worth PPV to Goz and to me now Ricky seems to be trading more on 'my amazing fans' than his ability as top possible p4p rated fighter."
and i was making the point the fight is a genuine ppv fight. well compared to some ppv fights that have been on recently (amir khan) come on
I think the £50+ a month I already give Sky should get me this fight though. That's my prerogative - it's not worth £15 to me.
I understand why I might need to stump up when they are putting together a mega-fight like the PBF one but not this, not for me.
The Lazcano PPV was worse though, at least as you say this is between the 2 arguably best Light Welters out there.
Even then I am not watching it live.
-
Khaosai-Galaxy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2739
- Joined: 29 Apr 2007, 12:15
Re: Ricky Hatton's Cliches
None, NONE of them are on the listDG. wrote:Khaosai-Galaxy wrote:Abbo wrote:Honestly Galaxy, you know exactly the point being made. Hatton blatantly milks this character as he believes it sells.
Hatton - Lazcano, 55,000 tickets sold, biggest ticket seller in world boxing
It does sell
And how many do you think are on the BNP list? I hear he has a lot of racists following him, any truth?
Only men of pure socialist heart follow Ricky Hatton
Re: Ricky Hatton's Cliches
DLH would never have sparked Floyd.banjo wrote:What makes a fight qualify for PPV?
An example is DLH-Mayweather which we recieved on normal sky, yet we had to pay £15 for Mayweather-Hatton. Alright I know DLH was past it and would have sparked the loudmouth 10 years ago but surely DLH-Mayweather is a bigger fight.
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: Ricky Hatton's Cliches
for the record KG I wasn't interested in Jones Calzaghe for the reason you give but i am interested in Hatton - PaulieKhaosai-Galaxy wrote:
Well quite, its a very competetive fight between 2 top 5 140 pounders, sadly the old women brigade arent interested in this fight because they dont like Hatton's personality or his voice, or because he repeats himself in interviews or eff knows what....
Interesting to note its the same whinging old women who weren't interested in Calzaghe - Jones because it wasnt a "competetive matchup"...
hope that helps x x
-
Phenomenal-Nutrition
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5185
- Joined: 10 Feb 2005, 14:53
Re: Ricky Hatton's Cliches
Was that after you went through the BNP list and kept seeing under hobbies: Going to Ricky Hatton fightsDG. wrote:Khaosai-Galaxy wrote:Abbo wrote:Honestly Galaxy, you know exactly the point being made. Hatton blatantly milks this character as he believes it sells.
Hatton - Lazcano, 55,000 tickets sold, biggest ticket seller in world boxing
It does sell
And how many do you think are on the BNP list? I hear he has a lot of racists following him, any truth?
-
E
- Heavyweight

Re: Ricky Hatton's Cliches
"I see my Dad's here. Tiny he is. The only man who's got a full size photo in his passport"
"and there's me girlfriend Jennifer. What a babe. You seen the film...."
boom boom.
"and there's me girlfriend Jennifer. What a babe. You seen the film...."
boom boom.
-
Khaosai-Galaxy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2739
- Joined: 29 Apr 2007, 12:15
Re: Ricky Hatton's Cliches
Its easy to be an internet cynic moaning like an old women on a forum.
But its much much more difficult to fit a whole lime under your foreskin.
But its much much more difficult to fit a whole lime under your foreskin.
Re: Ricky Hatton's Cliches
Malignaggi's got a bad hand.
-
frankwarrenfan
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 88
- Joined: 30 Oct 2008, 19:04
Re: Ricky Hatton's Cliches
he nicked the passport joke from ronnie corbett
write your own material ricky!
write your own material ricky!
Re: Ricky Hatton's Cliches
Harsh.frankwarrenfan wrote:he nicked the passport joke from ronnie corbett
write your own material ricky!
"See that doubled up body shot, he's nicked that from Mike McCallum he has.."
-
oliverfennell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5564
- Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37
Re: Ricky Hatton's Cliches
Need I point out that in the event, it WASN'T...Khaosai-Galaxy wrote:Interesting to note its the same whinging old women who weren't interested in Calzaghe - Jones because it wasnt a "competetive matchup"...
Re: Ricky Hatton's Cliches
I misread this thread at first. Thought it was going to be a celebration of Ricky "Hugman" Hatton's best clinches.
Are his clinches becoming cliches?
Lost their meaning and impact through repetition?
Are his clinches becoming cliches?
Lost their meaning and impact through repetition?