Why Hagler Could Take a Punch

Post Reply
SorceryatCaesars
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3
Joined: 29 Sep 2008, 18:15

Why Hagler Could Take a Punch

Post by SorceryatCaesars »

(as detailed in ‘Sorcery at Caesars’)

Hagler’s lineage provided him magnificent boxing genes – that much was certain. He was graced with long arms and shoulders as wide as his ambition. More remarkable was his temporalis – a muscle that runs across the skull at both temples. Most temporalis are a quarter-inch thick, but both of Hagler’s were one inch, a phenomenon that astounded his physician when it was discovered during a routine exam in 1983. Hagler’s temporalis acted as a natural helmet and almost certainly helped him absorb blows. But he was sensitive to the notion of freakish physicality, perhaps from a racial perspective, and bridled at questions about his temporalis.
glittermonkey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2658
Joined: 28 Feb 2004, 18:03

Re: Why Hagler Could Take a Punch

Post by glittermonkey »

Thanks.
funso banjo baby
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4417
Joined: 23 Sep 2005, 11:05

Re: Why Hagler Could Take a Punch

Post by funso banjo baby »

:roll:

yeah that must be it



or .....


he was no slouch?

just a thought
Baby Face Finster
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 17328
Joined: 29 Dec 2004, 23:34

Re: Why Hagler Could Take a Punch

Post by Baby Face Finster »

Put the word out. Any one with a larger than normal temporalis can become a future boxing great if they get into the sport. Talent, fast hands, determination, heart, good athleticism, who needs that? As long as you got the right size temporalis none of that matters. I'm sure the chinese are looking into it this instant.
JAHamilton77
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 613
Joined: 06 Mar 2006, 13:14

Re: Why Hagler Could Take a Punch

Post by JAHamilton77 »

funso banjo baby wrote::roll:

yeah that must be it



or .....


he was no slouch?

just a thought

its why he could take a punch..... there were plenty of good boxers who couldnt.
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: Why Hagler Could Take a Punch

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

The point, rather bald-faced, is to promote the book.

I understand that need, but the thread has no place on this forum, at the very least.
JAHamilton77
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 613
Joined: 06 Mar 2006, 13:14

Re: Why Hagler Could Take a Punch

Post by JAHamilton77 »

2 people made the same mistake....
the title was not "Why Hagler Was a Great Boxer" its......
Why Hagler Could Take a Punch
JAHamilton77
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 613
Joined: 06 Mar 2006, 13:14

Re: Why Hagler Could Take a Punch

Post by JAHamilton77 »

this should be in BotP
glittermonkey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2658
Joined: 28 Feb 2004, 18:03

Re: Why Hagler Could Take a Punch

Post by glittermonkey »

JAHamilton77 wrote:this should be in BotP
Hopefully they'll treat this blatant plug with the disdain it deserves.
Poncey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7525
Joined: 21 May 2007, 07:48

Re: Why Hagler Could Take a Punch

Post by Poncey »

George Kimball provides an interesting reason in Four Kings as to why Marvin could take a thump, his skull was thicker than normal.
AngryGoon38
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1837
Joined: 10 Jun 2008, 14:51

Re: Why Hagler Could Take a Punch

Post by AngryGoon38 »

When i drink enough whiskey,my skull becomes thicker than normal.
ringsider
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Why Hagler Could Take a Punch

Post by ringsider »

Hagler was hardly an ATG. He was the MW king at a time when the MW ranks didn't have much going on.

Then his big shot, he tried to out box Leonard. hahaha :lol: :lol:

He was exposed for the medicore boxer he was.

Hagler was a good banger and always came ready to fight, but he really wasn't very skilled. :shame:
Robinson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4415
Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 22:34

Re: Why Hagler Could Take a Punch

Post by Robinson »

Whatever you think of him, he worked hard in the ring and the gym and gave
us some damned exciting fights.
Post Reply