Which active fighters ALWAYS seek the tough matches?
I say
1)SSM
2)Winky
3)David Haye
4)Holyfield( if they want to fight him)
5) Barerra
6)Cotto
7) Pacman
8) Margarito
Any more?
Becausemark thompson wrote:how can you not have Hatton in that list ???? oh yeah i know why![]()
TyszuDG. wrote:Becausemark thompson wrote:how can you not have Hatton in that list ???? oh yeah i know why![]()
He id not fight the following when he had the chance.
Cotto
Urkal for the European Title
Witter for the British and WBC Title
Judah
Corley For the WBO Title
You are the poster who mentioned Hatton in this thread so I put you straight.mark thompson wrote:TyszuDG. wrote:Becausemark thompson wrote:how can you not have Hatton in that list ???? oh yeah i know why![]()
He id not fight the following when he had the chance.
Cotto
Urkal for the European Title
Witter for the British and WBC Title
Judah
Corley For the WBO Title
Mayweather
Collazo
Urango
Mallinaggi
Please DG you fascination with Witter is worrying![]()
![]()
liamlion wrote:Unfortunately out of the top three british fighters (Calzaghe, Hatton & Haye) Haye has shown himself to be the only one (with the exception of Hatton's challenge of Mayweather) who is prepared to chase the top fighters.
De la Hoya is pretty much insiginificant these days (compared to what he was 5 years ago). If a De la Hoya and Hatton fight had took place 5 years ago then the fight would have a total different meaning, likewise if Calzaghe had fought Roy Jones 10 years then the result would have actually counted for something.
Pacman vs Hatton is a better fight, for the fact that Pacman is hungry and in his prime. The same cannot be said of De la Hoya.
I dont think i did mate.mark thompson wrote:liamlion wrote:Unfortunately out of the top three british fighters (Calzaghe, Hatton & Haye) Haye has shown himself to be the only one (with the exception of Hatton's challenge of Mayweather) who is prepared to chase the top fighters.
De la Hoya is pretty much insiginificant these days (compared to what he was 5 years ago). If a De la Hoya and Hatton fight had took place 5 years ago then the fight would have a total different meaning, likewise if Calzaghe had fought Roy Jones 10 years then the result would have actually counted for something.
Pacman vs Hatton is a better fight, for the fact that Pacman is hungry and in his prime. The same cannot be said of De la Hoya.
You missed Hattons win over Tsyzu .
Yes, and Castillo was a good win on paper in most peoples P4P listsmark thompson wrote:liamlion wrote:Unfortunately out of the top three british fighters (Calzaghe, Hatton & Haye) Haye has shown himself to be the only one (with the exception of Hatton's challenge of Mayweather) who is prepared to chase the top fighters.
De la Hoya is pretty much insiginificant these days (compared to what he was 5 years ago). If a De la Hoya and Hatton fight had took place 5 years ago then the fight would have a total different meaning, likewise if Calzaghe had fought Roy Jones 10 years then the result would have actually counted for something.
Pacman vs Hatton is a better fight, for the fact that Pacman is hungry and in his prime. The same cannot be said of De la Hoya.
You missed Hattons win over Tsyzu .
So you dont consider Tyszu as being top class then ?liamlion wrote:I dont think i did mate.mark thompson wrote:liamlion wrote:Unfortunately out of the top three british fighters (Calzaghe, Hatton & Haye) Haye has shown himself to be the only one (with the exception of Hatton's challenge of Mayweather) who is prepared to chase the top fighters.
De la Hoya is pretty much insiginificant these days (compared to what he was 5 years ago). If a De la Hoya and Hatton fight had took place 5 years ago then the fight would have a total different meaning, likewise if Calzaghe had fought Roy Jones 10 years then the result would have actually counted for something.
Pacman vs Hatton is a better fight, for the fact that Pacman is hungry and in his prime. The same cannot be said of De la Hoya.
You missed Hattons win over Tsyzu .
I dont think i did mate.[/quote]mark thompson wrote:
You missed Hattons win over Tsyzu .
In 2001 I did. But he certainly wasnt in his prime in 2005 when prior to his fight with Hatton he had had just 2 fights in the previous 3 years.
So you dont consider Tyszu as being top class then ?[/quote]liamlion wrote:I dont think i did mate.mark thompson wrote:
You missed Hattons win over Tsyzu .
In 2001 I did. But he certainly wasnt in his prime in 2005 when prior to his fight with Hatton he had had just 2 fights in the previous 3 years.[/quote]
Why not?DG. wrote:banjo wrote:Oscar
Why?

1. Turned down MayweatherDG. wrote:Assuming the Old time fighters fight the best ( I KNOW THEY DID NOT ALWAYS!)
Which active fighters ALWAYS seek the tough matches?
I say
1)SSM
2)Winky
3)David Haye
4)Holyfield( if they want to fight him)
5) Barerra
6)Cotto
7) Pacman
8) Margarito
Any more?
Castillo was coming off a gift win against a green Herman Ngoudjo, Mallignaggi got a gift decision against Herman too, poor old Hermanmark thompson wrote: Probably not absolute prime but still one of the best in that division easily .
Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:1. Turned down MayweatherDG. wrote:Assuming the Old time fighters fight the best ( I KNOW THEY DID NOT ALWAYS!)
Which active fighters ALWAYS seek the tough matches?
I say
1)SSM
2)Winky
3)David Haye
4)Holyfield( if they want to fight him)
5) Barerra
6)Cotto
7) Pacman
8) Margarito
Any more?
2. Turned down Taylor rematch, DelaHoya for 6m
6. Arrum kept him clear of Mayweather at 140
7. Steered away from Guzman
8. Turned down career high paydays against Williams, Mosley, Mayweather
Urango was gash, he was just a paper champion(and a lucky one at that) and Malignaggi isn't all that either.mark thompson wrote:Urango