bugs wrote:I support Hatton, in much that same way I support my football team. It means that I have watched him and have a certain amount of faith and respect. I have not seen anything in his performances that suggests he could not beat the top guys, I think he can be them all. It is not all about who you have fought, sometimes you have to look at technique and skills too, even if they have not faced the best. I feel that Hatton's flurry of punches to head and body could overwhelm most fighters out there, he is not the hardest puncher, but it is the volume that stops good fighters.
So bring on Harris he will be stopped.
Hell, bring on Tszyu, Mitchell, Cotto, Mayweather there is not reason Hatton cant beat them all. Just because his promoter has not secured him the fights doesn't mean he isn't as good as well all thought he was a couple of years ago.
Also it is nice to have a fighter that doesn't talk shit, he knows he is good, but doesn't rub your face in it, the man is an abassador, or would be if he was more of a poster boy.
Sometimes you have to support and have faith, not just moan.
I agree with the sentiment 100%..but can I ask
Exactly which good (respectively good amongst their piers I mean)fighters has Hatton stopped?
Ok, we can talk about skills all day, he can beat him, he can't beat him and so forth.
But when you mention Tszyu, Mitchell, Cotto, Mayweather and Harris, you are mentioning guys who have stepped to the plate time and time again.
It is only then you can judge skills, talent,heart and the whole package.
You say ". It is not all about who you have fought"...but unfortunately it IS about who you have fought...It is how a fighter is judged and remembered. That is fundamental.
People have labelled me a stern critic of Hatton, which is true...What is also true is that I wholeheartedly wish Richard Hatton all the luck in the world with his career, and hope he is successful.
I think he can be.