Lennox Lewis - quashes rumours of a comeback
Personally I think he would be nuts to comeback - unless of course the bank manager has had a chat with him
What, he would be nuts to accept a $100 M dollar payday? I would suggest it's you who's nutsSpud wrote:Found this:
Lennox Lewis - quashes rumours of a comeback
Personally I think he would be nuts to comeback - unless of course the bank manager has had a chat with him
$100 mill.... I think that would be too much money for Lewis to ignore, even if Lewis has kept most his wealthDG. wrote:Lennox wants $100 million!
43-year-old former heavyweight champion Lennox Lewis says he will return for a rematch with Vitali Klitschko if someone coughs up $100 million. "It is not and it has never been about the money," Lewis claimed to the London Independent. "I've had big offers again and again since the first day that I retired and I always say 'No'. It is about respect and the glory. I have nothing to prove."
Monday, November 24
= Lennox is not coming back!
What - and you believe everything that comes out of someone's mouth at face value?jameswilson wrote:It is not and it has never been about the money,"
"I've had big offers again and again since the first day that I retired and I always say 'No'. It is about respect and the glory. I have nothing to prove."
Those are the actual words that came out his mouth from the article. And using that info they have come to the conclusion that he would come out of retirement for 100mill.
E wrote:How many times do fighters say 'I will never come back' and then do.jameswilson wrote:It is not and it has never been about the money,"
"I've had big offers again and again since the first day that I retired and I always say 'No'. It is about respect and the glory. I have nothing to prove."
Those are the actual words that came out his mouth from the article. And using that info they have come to the conclusion that he would come out of retirement for 100mill.
Please don't tell me schools have dumbed down so much that you have abbreviated 'one million dollars' as WMD. Surely you cant mean weapons of mass destruction.E wrote:or what about the guarantee of WMD?
Um yes.....jameswilson wrote:E wrote:How many times do fighters say 'I will never come back' and then do.jameswilson wrote:It is not and it has never been about the money,"
"I've had big offers again and again since the first day that I retired and I always say 'No'. It is about respect and the glory. I have nothing to prove."
Those are the actual words that came out his mouth from the article. And using that info they have come to the conclusion that he would come out of retirement for 100mill.
Hold on let me count.
Please don't tell me schools have dumbed down so much that you have abbreviated 'one million dollars' as WMD. Surely you cant mean weapons of mass destruction.E wrote:or what about the guarantee of WMD?
Yes he does that he can beat Vitali either on points or by KO. Lennox was losing when he used a slashing punch that caused one of the worst eye injuries I have ever seen. Not a good way to get the decision.mark thompson wrote:It's not the money and he has nothing to prove anyway
Lennox does not have anything to prove to anybody, and coming back at 43 definitely wouldn't prove anything .WildWaylon wrote:Yes he does that he can beat Vitali either on points or by KO. Lennox was losing when he used a slashing punch that caused one of the worst eye injuries I have ever seen. Not a good way to get the decision.mark thompson wrote:It's not the money and he has nothing to prove anyway
Foreman came back at 45 and won a World title, anyway I have given my reasons Mark.mark thompson wrote:Lennox does not have anything to prove to anybody, and coming back at 43 definitely wouldn't prove anything .WildWaylon wrote:Yes he does that he can beat Vitali either on points or by KO. Lennox was losing when he used a slashing punch that caused one of the worst eye injuries I have ever seen. Not a good way to get the decision.mark thompson wrote:It's not the money and he has nothing to prove anyway
Hes already beaten him, torn his face to pieces and wasn't far off KO'ing Vitali, Vitali was hanging on for dear life in the 5th and 6th and looked spent. I don't see the controversy, as it was Lennox walked Vitali down and walked through his arm punches to land the much more damaging punches. Lennox had the power that was starting to land more consistently, Vitali just didnt have the power to bother LEnnox and Lennox was figuring him out (ie using the left hook more). The judges had it 4-2 but it could just have easily been 3-3 and Lennox shook Vitali to his boots in a way Vitali didn't manage.WildWaylon wrote:Yes he does that he can beat Vitali either on points or by KO. Lennox was losing when he used a slashing punch that caused one of the worst eye injuries I have ever seen. Not a good way to get the decision.mark thompson wrote:It's not the money and he has nothing to prove anyway
Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:I'll get you lot posting in only one thread on a topic if it kills me!
You wouldnt look good with your eye hanging out. Of course it was affecting Vitalys performance. Fact is Lennox was behind and the slashing hook won him the fight. Lennox wont face him again, he knows he will get beaten up.Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:Hes already beaten him, torn his face to pieces and wasn't far off KO'ing Vitali, Vitali was hanging on for dear life in the 5th and 6th and looked spent. I don't see the controversy, as it was Lennox walked Vitali down and walked through his arm punches to land the much more damaging punches. Lennox had the power that was starting to land more consistently, Vitali just didnt have the power to bother LEnnox and Lennox was figuring him out (ie using the left hook more). The judges had it 4-2 but it could just have easily been 3-3 and Lennox shook Vitali to his boots in a way Vitali didn't manage.WildWaylon wrote:Yes he does that he can beat Vitali either on points or by KO. Lennox was losing when he used a slashing punch that caused one of the worst eye injuries I have ever seen. Not a good way to get the decision.mark thompson wrote:It's not the money and he has nothing to prove anyway
The only reason there is controversy is because of the shitty biased HBO commentary that seemed to think '1 more right hand will put Lennox away' URM he keeps landing them because Lennox doesnt even bother blocking those arm punches because hes happy to exchange and get off his more powerful shots